Measurement of the Macular Hole Diameter by En Face Slab Optical Coherence Tomography Reflectance Imaging.
Journal
Translational vision science & technology
ISSN: 2164-2591
Titre abrégé: Transl Vis Sci Technol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101595919
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 10 2022
03 10 2022
Historique:
entrez:
6
10
2022
pubmed:
7
10
2022
medline:
12
10
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate the repeatability of macular hole (MH) diameter measurement on en face slab optical coherence tomography (OCT) reflectance images and assess its potential to predict visual acuity (VA). We enrolled 27 eyes with full-thickness MHs in this study. Preoperative en face slab OCT reflectance images were obtained. Image binarization, ellipse approximation, and uncorrected measurement of minimum diameter, min(ef_uc), and maximum diameter, max(ef_uc), were performed using ImageJ. In addition, magnification-corrected diameters were calculated as min(ef) and max(ef) using the Littman and modified Bennett formulas. Spectral-domain OCT horizontal images were used as the conventional method for the analysis: min(conv) and max(conv). The inter-rater reliability of the method was evaluated by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The following relationships were analyzed: (1) between logMAR VA and min(ef_uc), min(ef), and min(conv); and (2) between logMAR VA and max(ef_uc), max(ef), and max(conv). The min(ef) and max(ef) values were 439.4 ± 240.5 µm and 720.7 ± 346.1 µm, respectively. The ICC values were 0.985 and 0.999 for min(ef) and max(ef), and 0.885 and 0.909 for min(conv) and max(conv), respectively. Multivariate analysis suggested that min(ef), but not min(ef_uc) or min(conv), was associated with pre- and postoperative logMAR VA. Furthermore, max(ef), but not max(ef_uc) or max(conv), was also closely correlated with pre- and postoperative logMAR VA. The MH diameter measured by our method is highly reproducible and closely associated with VA compared to that measured by the conventional method. The MH diameter measured by this modality might serve as an accurate biomarker to predict visual function in eyes with MH.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36201199
pii: 2783730
doi: 10.1167/tvst.11.10.13
pmc: PMC9554266
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
13Références
Br J Ophthalmol. 2002 Apr;86(4):390-3
pubmed: 11914205
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017 Jun 1;58(7):3065-3072
pubmed: 28622398
Eye (Lond). 2018 Mar;32(3):590-596
pubmed: 29219961
Br J Ophthalmol. 2009 Nov;93(11):1488-91
pubmed: 19635721
Am J Ophthalmol. 1995 Jun;119(6):752-9
pubmed: 7785690
Ophthalmology. 2010 Oct;117(10):2018-25
pubmed: 20541263
Ophthalmology. 2013 Dec;120(12):2611-2619
pubmed: 24053995
Arch Ophthalmol. 2004 Feb;122(2):224-36
pubmed: 14769600
Ophthalmology. 2000 Oct;107(10):1939-48; discussion 1948-9
pubmed: 11013203
Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 May;143(5):814-9
pubmed: 17362861
Br J Ophthalmol. 2009 Aug;93(8):1005-15
pubmed: 19028741
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1994 Jun;232(6):361-7
pubmed: 8082844
Am J Ophthalmol. 2012 Apr;153(4):687-91
pubmed: 22244525
Eye (Lond). 2005 Aug;19(8):879-84
pubmed: 15389276
Arch Ophthalmol. 2002 Jan;120(1):29-35
pubmed: 11786054
N Engl J Med. 2012 Aug 16;367(7):606-15
pubmed: 22894573
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020 Jan 1;138(1):86-94
pubmed: 31774456
Ophthalmology. 2019 Oct;126(10):1399-1408
pubmed: 30711606