Seismic design of setback irregular steel structures based on life cycle cost.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 10 2022
06 10 2022
Historique:
received:
11
05
2022
accepted:
26
09
2022
entrez:
6
10
2022
pubmed:
7
10
2022
medline:
12
10
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The seismic design of conventional structures is mainly addressed considering the direct construction cost; the life cycle costs (LCCs) are often neglected. This paper proposes a performance-based framework for optimal seismic design of irregular steel structures; the LCC is involved as an optimization criterion. Two regular 7- and 10-story structures are first designed based on the design earthquake; their geometries are then changed to make them setback irregular having in overall four cases to investigate. Nonlinear analyses are performed to estimate the target displacement for annual exceedance probabilities, different specified acceleration levels, and, accordingly, the extent of the structural damage. The LCCs of the cases studied are calculated to achieve two objectives: an LCC-based optimal design of steel structures, and evaluating the extent of irregularity on the structures' LCCs. Results indicate that in the regular and irregular 7-story structures, a 40% and a 50% increase in the seismic loads can respectively reduce the LCCs by 31.3% and 34.9%. In the same vein, in the 10-story regular and irregular structures, increasing the seismic loads by 50% can reduce the LCCs by 33.4% and 31.7%, respectively. The results highlight the point that irregular structures, overall, require a higher initial cost than regular structures when the LCC is taken into account as an optimization criterion.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36202984
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-21247-8
pii: 10.1038/s41598-022-21247-8
pmc: PMC9537334
doi:
Substances chimiques
Steel
12597-69-2
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
16784Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Wisner, B. & Adams, J. Environmental health in emergencies and disasters: A Practical Guide (2002).
Flanagan, R., Norman, G. & Furbur, D. Life cycle costing for construction (Behalf of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors by Surveyors Publications, 1983).
Galibourg, J. M. Public works and overall cost. A current approach for public buildings. Guide for building owners, for a ‘total cost’ approach to public buildings Title. In Paris: Interministerial Mission for the Quality of Public Construction (2006).
Huang, Z., Lu, Y., Wong, N. H. & Poh, C. H. The true cost of ‘greening’ a building: Life cycle cost analysis of vertical greenery systems (VGS) in tropical climate. J. Clean. Prod. 228, 437–454 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.275
Flanagan, R. & Jewell, C. Whole Life Appraisal for Construction (John Wiley & Sons, 2008).
Goh, K. C., Goh, H. H. & Chong, H. Y. Integration model of fuzzy AHP and life-cycle cost analysis for evaluating highway infrastructure investments. J. Infrastruct. Syst. 25, 1 (2019).
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000473
Wang, N., Chang, Y. C. & Nunn, C. Lifecycle assessment for sustainable design options of a commercial building in Shanghai. Build. Environ. 45(6), 1415–1421 (2010).
doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.12.004
Fragiadakis, M., Lagaros, N. D. & Papadrakakis, M. Performance-based multiobjective optimum design of steel structures considering life-cycle cost. Struct. Multidiscipl. Optim. 32(1), 1–11 (2006).
doi: 10.1007/s00158-006-0009-y
Behnam, B. Seismic design of steel moment-resisting structures based on life-cycle cost. Struct. Build. 29(1), 23–30 (2019).
Goda, K. & Hong, H. P. Optimal seismic design considering risk attitude, societal tolerable risk level, and life quality criterion. J. Struct. Eng. 132(12), 2027–2035 (2006).
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:12(2027)
Wen, Y. K. & Kang, Y. J. Minimum building life-cycle cost design criteria. II: Applications. J. Struct. Eng. 127(3), 338–346 (2001).
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:3(338)
Sánchez-Silva, M. & Rackwitz, R. Socioeconomic implications of life quality index in design of optimum structures to withstand earthquakes. J. Struct. Eng. 130(6), 969–977 (2004).
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:6(969)
NourEldin, M., Naeem, A. & Kim, J. Life-cycle cost evaluation of steel structures retrofitted with steel slit damper and shape memory alloy-based hybrid damper. Adv. Struct. Eng. 22(1), 3–16 (2019).
doi: 10.1177/1369433218773487
Rosenblueth, E. & Mendoza, E. Reliability optimization in isostatic structures. J. Eng. Mech. Div. 97(6), 1625–1642 (1971).
doi: 10.1061/JMCEA3.0001521
Hasofer, A. M. Design for infrequent overloads. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 2(4), 387–388 (1974).
doi: 10.1002/eqe.4290020408
Liu, S. C., Neghabat, F. & Dougherty, M. R. Optimal aseismic design of building and equipment. J. Eng. Mech. Div. 102(3), 395–414 (1976).
doi: 10.1061/JMCEA3.0002121
Rosenblueth, E. & Jara, J. M. Constant versus time-dependent seismic design coefficients. In Proc., 3rd IFIP WG 7.5 Conf. on Reliability and Optimization of Structural Systems, pp. 315–327 (1991).
Rackwitz, R. Optimization—the basis of code-making and reliability verification. Struct. Saf. 22(1), 27–60 (2000).
doi: 10.1016/S0167-4730(99)00037-5
Liu, M., Wen, Y. K. & Burns, S. A. Life cycle cost-oriented seismic design optimization of steel moment frame structures with risk-taking preference. Eng. Struct. 26(10), 1407–1421 (2004).
doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.05.015
Goda, K. & Hong, H. P. Optimal seismic design for limited planning time horizon with detailed seismic hazard information. Struct. Saf. 28(3), 247–260 (2006).
doi: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2005.08.001
Liu, M., Burns, S. A. & Wen, Y. K. Multiobjective optimization for performance-based seismic design of steel moment frame structures. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 34(3), 289–306 (2005).
doi: 10.1002/eqe.426
Sarma, K. C. & Adeli, H. Life-cycle cost optimization of steel structures. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 55(12), 1451–1462 (2002).
doi: 10.1002/nme.549
Li, G. & Cheng, G. Damage-reduction-based structural optimum design for seismic RC frames. Struct. Multidiscipl. Optim. 25(4), 294–306 (2003).
doi: 10.1007/s00158-003-0299-2
Gencturk, B. Life-cycle cost assessment of RC and ECC frames using structural optimization. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 2012, 5 (2012).
Taflanidis, A. A. & Gidaris, I. Life-cycle cost-based optimal retrofitting of structures by fluid dampers. Struct. Congress 2013, 1777–1788 (2013).
Shin, H. & Singh, M. P. Minimum failure cost-based energy dissipation system designs for buildings in three seismic regions—part II : Application to viscous dampers. Eng. Struct. 74, 275–282 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.05.012
Hassani, M., Behnam, B. & Maknoon, R. A risk-based framework for design of concrete structures against earthquake. Comput. Concr. 25(2), 167–179 (2020).
Behnam, B. & Shojaei, F. A Risk Index for Mitigating Earthquake Damage in Urban Structures, no. 1985 (Elsevier Inc., Berlin, 2018).
Shojaei, F. & Behnam, B. Seismic vulnerability assessment of low-rise irregular reinforced concrete structures using cumulative damage index. Adv. Concr. Constr. 5(4), 407–422 (2017).
NIBS (National Institute of Building Sciences). In Fema 450: Recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures. Part 1 (NIBS, Washington, 2003.
Tsang, H. H., Yaghmaei-Sabegh, S., Anbazhagan, P. & Sheikh, M. N. A checking method for probabilistic seismic-hazard assessment: Case studies on three cities. Nat. Hazards 58(1), 67–84 (2011).
doi: 10.1007/s11069-010-9643-1
Rahnama, M., Seneviratna, P., Morrow, G. & Rodriguez, A. Seismic Performance-based loss assessment. In 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, vol. 1050 (2004).
Cornell, C. A. & Krawinkler, H. Progress and challenges in seismic performance assessment. PEER Cent. News 3(2), 1–4 (2000).
Chintanapakdee, C. & Chopra, A. K. Evaluation of modal pushover analysis using generic frames. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 32(3), 417–442 (2003).
doi: 10.1002/eqe.232
American Society of Civil Engineers. Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings. In: American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) (2017).
Inel, M. & Ozmen, H. B. Effects of plastic hinge properties in nonlinear analysis of reinforced concrete buildings. Eng. Struct. 28, 1494–1502 (2006).
doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.01.017
ATC-13. Earthquake damage evaluation data for California. In Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California (1985).
Warszawski, A., Gluck, J. & Segal, D. Economic evaluation of design codes-case of seismic design. J. Struct. Eng. 122(12), 1400–1408 (1996).
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:12(1400)
Abdoli, G. Estimation of social discount rate for Iran. Econ. Res. Rev. 10(3), 135–156 (2009).
Soni, D. P. & Mistry, B. B. Qualitative review of seismic response of vertically irregular building frames. ISET J. Earthq. Technol. 43(4), 121–132 (2006).