The economic case for hospital discharge services for people experiencing homelessness in England: An in-depth analysis with different service configurations providing specialist care.
cost-effectiveness
hospital discharge
intermediate care
people experiencing homelessness
step-down care
Journal
Health & social care in the community
ISSN: 1365-2524
Titre abrégé: Health Soc Care Community
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9306359
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2022
11 2022
Historique:
revised:
11
08
2022
received:
10
03
2022
accepted:
12
09
2022
pubmed:
8
10
2022
medline:
20
12
2022
entrez:
7
10
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
There are long-standing concerns that people experiencing homelessness may not recover well if left unsupported after a hospital stay. This study reports on a study investigating the cost-effectiveness of three different 'in patient care coordination and discharge planning' configurations for adults experiencing homelessness who are discharged from hospitals in England. The first configuration provided a clinical and housing in-reach service during acute care and discharge coordination but with no 'step-down' care. The second configuration provided clinical and housing in-reach, discharge coordination and 'step-down' intermediate care. The third configuration consisted of housing support workers providing in-reach and discharge coordination as well as step-down care. These three configurations were each compared with 'standard care' (control, defined as one visit by the homelessness health nurse before discharge during which patients received an information leaflet on local services). Multiple sources of data and multi-outcome measures were adopted to assess the cost utility of hospital discharge service delivery for the NHS and broader public perspective. Details of 354 participants were collated on service delivery costs (salary, on-costs, capital, overheads and 'hotel' costs, advertising and other indirect costs), the economic consequences for different public services (e.g. NHS, social care, criminal justice, housing, etc.) and health utilities (quality-adjusted-life-years, QALYs). Findings were complex across the configurations, but, on the whole, there was promising evidence suggesting that, with delivery costs similar to those reported for bed-based intermediate care, step-down care secured better health outcomes and improved cost-effectiveness (compared with usual care) within NICE cost-effectiveness recommendations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36205443
doi: 10.1111/hsc.14057
pmc: PMC10092708
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e6194-e6205Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : 13/156/10
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Health and Social Care in the Community published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Health Econ. 2004 Dec;13(12):1203-10
pubmed: 15386669
Clin Med (Lond). 2016 Jun;16(3):223-9
pubmed: 27251910
Lancet Public Health. 2020 Jan;5(1):e2-e3
pubmed: 31806489
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e6194-e6205
pubmed: 36205443
Healthc Policy. 2020 Aug;16(1):14-21
pubmed: 32813636
Value Health. 2012 Jul-Aug;15(5):708-15
pubmed: 22867780
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jan 27;(1):CD000313
pubmed: 26816297
BMJ. 2011 Sep 14;343:d5376
pubmed: 22067473