The economic case for hospital discharge services for people experiencing homelessness in England: An in-depth analysis with different service configurations providing specialist care.

cost-effectiveness hospital discharge intermediate care people experiencing homelessness step-down care

Journal

Health & social care in the community
ISSN: 1365-2524
Titre abrégé: Health Soc Care Community
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9306359

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 2022
Historique:
revised: 11 08 2022
received: 10 03 2022
accepted: 12 09 2022
pubmed: 8 10 2022
medline: 20 12 2022
entrez: 7 10 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

There are long-standing concerns that people experiencing homelessness may not recover well if left unsupported after a hospital stay. This study reports on a study investigating the cost-effectiveness of three different 'in patient care coordination and discharge planning' configurations for adults experiencing homelessness who are discharged from hospitals in England. The first configuration provided a clinical and housing in-reach service during acute care and discharge coordination but with no 'step-down' care. The second configuration provided clinical and housing in-reach, discharge coordination and 'step-down' intermediate care. The third configuration consisted of housing support workers providing in-reach and discharge coordination as well as step-down care. These three configurations were each compared with 'standard care' (control, defined as one visit by the homelessness health nurse before discharge during which patients received an information leaflet on local services). Multiple sources of data and multi-outcome measures were adopted to assess the cost utility of hospital discharge service delivery for the NHS and broader public perspective. Details of 354 participants were collated on service delivery costs (salary, on-costs, capital, overheads and 'hotel' costs, advertising and other indirect costs), the economic consequences for different public services (e.g. NHS, social care, criminal justice, housing, etc.) and health utilities (quality-adjusted-life-years, QALYs). Findings were complex across the configurations, but, on the whole, there was promising evidence suggesting that, with delivery costs similar to those reported for bed-based intermediate care, step-down care secured better health outcomes and improved cost-effectiveness (compared with usual care) within NICE cost-effectiveness recommendations.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36205443
doi: 10.1111/hsc.14057
pmc: PMC10092708
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e6194-e6205

Subventions

Organisme : Department of Health
ID : 13/156/10
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

© 2022 The Authors. Health and Social Care in the Community published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Références

Health Econ. 2004 Dec;13(12):1203-10
pubmed: 15386669
Clin Med (Lond). 2016 Jun;16(3):223-9
pubmed: 27251910
Lancet Public Health. 2020 Jan;5(1):e2-e3
pubmed: 31806489
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e6194-e6205
pubmed: 36205443
Healthc Policy. 2020 Aug;16(1):14-21
pubmed: 32813636
Value Health. 2012 Jul-Aug;15(5):708-15
pubmed: 22867780
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jan 27;(1):CD000313
pubmed: 26816297
BMJ. 2011 Sep 14;343:d5376
pubmed: 22067473

Auteurs

Michela Tinelli (M)

Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, The London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.

Raphael Wittenberg (R)

Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, The London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.

Michelle Cornes (M)

NIHR Policy Research Unit in Health and Social Care Workforce, London, UK.

Robert W Aldridge (RW)

Institute of Health Informatics, University College London Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, London, UK.

Michael Clark (M)

Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, The London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.

Richard Byng (R)

Community and Primary Care Research Group, Peninsula School of Medicine, University of Plymouth, ITTC, Plymouth, UK.

Graham Foster (G)

Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

James Fuller (J)

NIHR Policy Research Unit in Health and Social Care Workforce, London, UK.

Andrew Hayward (A)

Institute of Health Informatics, University College London Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, London, UK.

Nigel Hewett (N)

Pathway and the Faculty for Homeless and Inclusion Health, London, UK.

Alan Kilmister (A)

NIHR Policy Research Unit in Health and Social Care Workforce, London, UK.

Jill Manthorpe (J)

NIHR Policy Research Unit in Health and Social Care Workforce, London, UK.

Joanne Neale (J)

National Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, Addictions Sciences Building, London, UK.

Elizabeth Biswell (E)

NIHR Policy Research Unit in Health and Social Care Workforce, London, UK.

Martin Whiteford (M)

Department of Community Nursing and Community Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH