Characteristics of Real-world Commercially Insured Patients With Treatment-resistant Depression Initiated on Esketamine Nasal Spray or Conventional Therapies in the United States.

baseline patient characteristics cohort study conventional therapies esketamine nasal spray major depressive disorder treatment-resistant depression

Journal

Clinical therapeutics
ISSN: 1879-114X
Titre abrégé: Clin Ther
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7706726

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 2022
Historique:
received: 07 01 2022
revised: 31 08 2022
accepted: 08 09 2022
pubmed: 8 10 2022
medline: 7 12 2022
entrez: 7 10 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

This study aimed to characterize patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) initiating esketamine or conventional therapies. Adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) were selected from the IBM MarketScan Databases. A claims-based algorithm identified patients with evidence of TRD, defined as initiation of a new antidepressant therapy after 2 different antidepressant trials of adequate dose and duration during the most recent major depressive episode. Patients receiving treatment on/after March 5, 2019 (esketamine approval date for TRD), were classified to the esketamine cohort if they newly initiated esketamine (index date) or to the TRD conventional therapies cohorts if they newly initiated electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), or pharmacologic therapies (index date was the therapy initiation date, prioritizing ECT, then TMS, then pharmacologic antidepressant therapies). Patient characteristics in the 6 months before therapy initiation were described. The esketamine cohort included 246 patients (mean age, 46.5 years; 63.0% female), and the TRD conventional therapies cohorts included 104,164 patients (mean age, 46.9 years; 74.8% female; 0.4% initiated ECT, 1.2% initiated TMS). During the 6 months preindex, in the esketamine and TRD conventional therapies cohorts, 77.6% and 41.4% received psychotherapy and 82.9% and 34.2% had a psychiatrist visit, respectively. Most patients had outpatient care for MDD in the esketamine (91.9%) and TRD conventional therapies (63.6%) cohorts; 57.3% and 21.0% received care at specialized mental health care settings. MDD was classified as "severe" among 81.3% and 35.1% of patients in the esketamine and TRD conventional therapies cohorts . Preindex mental health-related (MHR) inpatient admissions and emergency department visits were identified in 12.2% and 16.3% of the esketamine cohort and in 8.2% and 10.3% of the TRD conventional therapies cohort. Before therapy initiation, 34.6% and 17.6% of the esketamine and TRD conventional therapies cohorts received ≥3 unique antidepressants. Suicidal ideation or behavior was observed in 8.5% and 3.6% of the esketamine and TRD conventional therapies cohorts pretherapy initiation. Mean monthly all-cause health care costs in the esketamine cohort were $2532 (58.2% MHR); in the TRD conventional therapies cohorts, costs were $1873 (32.4% MHR). Among patients with TRD, those initiating esketamine relative to conventional therapies displayed higher MDD severity, used more MHR inpatient/emergency department services and antidepressant treatments, and incurred higher health care costs 6 months pretherapy initiation. These findings suggest potential benefits of identifying and treating patients with TRD earlier with more effective treatments and should inform payers in consideration of esketamine coverage.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36207167
pii: S0149-2918(22)00319-8
doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2022.09.005
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Esketamine 50LFG02TXD
Nasal Sprays 0
Antidepressive Agents 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1432-1448

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Interest Ms Zhdanava, Mr Pilon, Ms Morrison, Ms Shah, and Mr Lefebvre are employees of Analysis Group, Inc., a consulting company that has provided paid consulting services to Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, which funded the development and conduct of this study and manuscript. Ms Karkare and Ms Joshi are employees of Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, and stockholders of Johnson & Johnson. Dr Nash was an employee of Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, at the time of study conduct. The sponsor was involved in the study design, data collection, data analysis, manuscript preparation, and publication decisions.

Auteurs

Swapna Karkare (S)

Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Titusville, New Jersey, USA.

Maryia Zhdanava (M)

Analysis Group, Inc., Montréal, Québec, Canada. Electronic address: Masha.Zhdanava@analysisgroup.com.

Dominic Pilon (D)

Analysis Group, Inc., Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Abigail I Nash (AI)

Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Titusville, New Jersey, USA.

Laura Morrison (L)

Analysis Group, Inc., Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Aditi Shah (A)

Analysis Group, Inc., Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Patrick Lefebvre (P)

Analysis Group, Inc., Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Kruti Joshi (K)

Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Titusville, New Jersey, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH