European consensus for the diagnosis of MCI and mild dementia: Preparatory phase.
Delphi procedure
MCI
consensus
etiological diagnosis
imaging
major neurocognitive disorder
mild dementia - biomarker
neurocognitive disorders
Journal
Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association
ISSN: 1552-5279
Titre abrégé: Alzheimers Dement
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101231978
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2023
05 2023
Historique:
revised:
29
07
2022
received:
02
03
2022
accepted:
09
08
2022
medline:
15
5
2023
pubmed:
10
10
2022
entrez:
9
10
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Etiological diagnosis of neurocognitive disorders of middle-old age relies on biomarkers, although evidence for their rational use is incomplete. A European task force is defining a diagnostic workflow where expert experience fills evidence gaps for biomarker validity and prioritization. We report methodology and preliminary results. Using a Delphi consensus method supported by a systematic literature review, 22 delegates from 11 relevant scientific societies defined workflow assumptions. We extracted diagnostic accuracy figures from literature on the use of biomarkers in the diagnosis of main forms of neurocognitive disorders. Supported by this evidence, panelists defined clinical setting (specialist outpatient service), application stage (MCI-mild dementia), and detailed pre-assessment screening (clinical-neuropsychological evaluations, brain imaging, and blood tests). The Delphi consensus on these assumptions set the stage for the development of the first pan-European workflow for biomarkers' use in the etiological diagnosis of middle-old age neurocognitive disorders at MCI-mild dementia stages. Rational use of biomarkers in neurocognitive disorders lacks consensus in Europe. A consensus of experts will define a workflow for the rational use of biomarkers. The diagnostic workflow will be patient-centered and based on clinical presentation. The workflow will be updated as new evidence accrues.
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers
0
Types de publication
Systematic Review
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1729-1741Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Alzheimer's & Dementia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association.
Références
Dubois B, Feldman HH, Jacova C, et al. Advancing research diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer's disease: the IWG-2 criteria. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13:614-629. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70090-0
McKhann GM, Knopman DS, Chertkow H, et al. The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s & Dementia. 2011;7(3):263-269. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.005
McKeith IG, Ferman TJ, Thomas AJ, et al. Research criteria for the diagnosis of prodromal dementia with Lewy bodies. Neurology. 2020;94:743-755. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000009323
Nobili F, Arbizu J, Bouwman F, et al. European Association of Nuclear Medicine and European Academy of Neurology recommendations for the use of brain 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in neurodegenerative cognitive impairment and dementia: Delphi consensus. E J Neurol. 2018;25:1201-1217. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.13728
Jack CR, Bennett DA, Blennow K, et al. NIA-AA Research Framework: toward a biological definition of Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2018;14:535-562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.018
Schöll M, Maass A, Mattsson N, et al. Biomarkers for tau pathology. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2019;97:18-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcn.2018.12.001
Wolters EE, Dodich A, Boccardi M, et al. Clinical validity of increased cortical uptake of [18F]flortaucipir on PET as a biomarker for Alzheimer's disease in the context of a structured 5-phase biomarker development framework. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48:2097-2109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-05118-w
Kägi G, Bhatia KP, Tolosa E. The role of DAT-SPECT in movement disorders. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010;81:5-12. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2008.157370
Yoshita M, Taki J, Yokoyama K, et al. Value of 123I-MIBG radioactivity in the differential diagnosis of DLB from AD. Neurology. 2006;66:1850-1854. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000219640.59984.a7
Rascol O, Schelosky L. 123 I-metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy in Parkinson's disease and related disorders. Mov Disord. 2009;24:S732-41. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.22499
Boeve BF, Silber MH, Ferman TJ, et al. Clinicopathologic correlations in 172 cases of rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder with or without a coexisting neurologic disorder. Sleep Med. 2013;14:754-762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2012.10.015
Frisoni GB, Boccardi M, Barkhof F, et al. Strategic roadmap for an early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease based on biomarkers. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16:661-676. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30159-X
Boccardi M, Nicolosi V, Festari C, et al. Italian consensus recommendations for a biomarker-based aetiological diagnosis in mild cognitive impairment patients. E J Neurol. 2020;27:475-483. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.14117
de Mendonça A, Ribeiro F, Guerreiro M, Garcia C. Frontotemporal mild cognitive impairment. J Alzheimers Dis. 2004;6:1-9. https://doi.org/10.3233/jad-2004-6101
Taragano FE ARF. Mild behavioral impairment: the early diagnosis. The Eleventh International Congress of the International Psychogeriatric Association. Chicago, Illinois: 2003, p. 17-22.
Wright Rowe. Principles of Forecasting: A Handbook of Researchers and Practitioners, Boston. In: J. Scott Armstrong, ed. Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2001.
McLaughlin MW. The rand change agent study revisited: macro perspectives and micro realities. Educ Res. 1990;19:11-16. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x019009011
Rowe G, Wright G. The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis. Int J Forecast. 1999;15:353-375. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2070(99)00018-7
Dalkey N, Helmer O. An experimental application of the DELPHI method to the use of experts. Manag Sci. 1963;9:458-467. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.9.3.458
Hasson F, Keeney S, McKenna H. Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. J Adv Nurs. 2000;32:1008-1015.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62:1006-1012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005
Stinton C, McKeith I, Taylor J-P, et al. Pharmacological management of Lewy body dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Psychiatry. 2015;172:731-742. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2015.14121582
Whiting PF, Rutjes AWS, Westwood ME, et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155:529-536. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009
Boccardi M, Festari C, Altomare D, et al. Assessing FDG-PET diagnostic accuracy studies to develop recommendations for clinical use in dementia. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45:1470-1486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-4024-1
Hampel H, Cummings J, Blennow K, Gao P, Jack CR Jr, Vergallo A. Developing the ATX(N) classification for use across the Alzheimer disease continuum. Nat Rev Neurol. 2021;17(9):580-589. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-021-00520-w. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
Markmann C, Spickermann A, von der Gracht HA, Brem A. Improving the question formulation in Delphi-like surveys: analysis of the effects of abstract language and amount of information on response behavior. Futures Foresight Sci. 2021;3:e56-76. https://doi.org/10.1002/ffo2.56
Mauksch S, von der Gracht HA, Gordon TJ. Who is an expert for foresight? A review of identification methods. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2020;154:119982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119982
Delphi method n.d. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delphi_method (accessed June 22, 2021)
Keeney S, Hasson F, McKenna H. The Delphi Technique in Nursing and Health Research. Wiley; 2011. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444392029
Helmer-Hirschberg O. Analysis of the Future: The Delphi Method. RAND Corporation; 1697.
Mullen PM. Delphi: myths and reality. J Health Organ Manag. 2003;17:37-52. https://doi.org/10.1108/14777260310469319
Grisham T. The Delphi technique: a method for testing complex and multifaceted topics. Int J Manag Proj Bus. 2009;2:112-130. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538370910930545
Akins RB, Tolson H, Cole BR. Stability of response characteristics of a Delphi panel: application of bootstrap data expansion. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005;5:37. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-5-37
Cummings J, Aisen P, Apostolova LG, Atri A, Salloway S, Weiner M. Aducanumab: appropriate use recommendations. J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2021:8(4):398-410. https://doi.org/10.14283/jpad.2021.41
Yiannopoulou KG, Anastasiou AI, Zachariou V, Pelidou S-H. Reasons for failed trials of disease-modifying treatments for Alzheimer Disease and their contribution in recent research. Biomedicines. 2019;7:97-113. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines7040097
Elson P. Do older adults presenting with memory complaints wish to be told if later diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease? Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006;21:419-425. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.1485
Brodaty H, Seeher K, Gibson L. Dementia time to death: a systematic literature review on survival time and years of life lost in people with dementia. Int Psychogeriatr. 2012;24:1034-1045. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610211002924
Mendez MF, Shapira JS, McMurtray A, Licht E. Preliminary findings: behavioral worsening on donepezil in patients with frontotemporal dementia. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007;15:84-87. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.JGP.0000231744.69631.33
Armstrong MJ, Weintraub D. The case for antipsychotics in dementia with Lewy bodies. Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2017;4:32-35. https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.12383
Chételat G, Arbizu J, Barthel H, et al. Amyloid-PET and 18F-FDG-PET in the diagnostic investigation of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19:951-962. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30314-8