Impact and utility of shallow pedigree using single-step genomic BLUP for prediction of unbiased genomic breeding values.
Genomic selection
Prediction bias
Selective genotyping
Shallow pedigree
Simulation
Single-step GBLUP
Journal
Tropical animal health and production
ISSN: 1573-7438
Titre abrégé: Trop Anim Health Prod
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 1277355
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 Oct 2022
10 Oct 2022
Historique:
received:
08
04
2022
accepted:
04
10
2022
entrez:
9
10
2022
pubmed:
10
10
2022
medline:
12
10
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In unstructured dairy programs, pedigree is usually shallow, which leads to biased prediction of breeding values using best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP). The objective of this study was to come out with a genomic prediction strategy that can utilize shallow pedigree information and predict unbiased and more accurate GEBV for sex-limited traits in a small population using single-step GBLUP (ssGBLUP). The data and models for a population under selection were simulated. Out of current 10 generations, 10th generation with 1000 candidates served as validation population. For the complete pedigree scenario, pedigree (P)BLUP estimated breeding values (EBV) were unbiased with accuracy (r) of 0.35 ± 0.02 and 0.26 ± 0.01 for 0.3 and 0.1 h
Identifiants
pubmed: 36210357
doi: 10.1007/s11250-022-03340-2
pii: 10.1007/s11250-022-03340-2
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
339Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.
Références
Aguilar, I., I. Misztal, Tsuruta, S., Legarra, A. & Wang, H. 2014. PREGSF90 – POSTGSF90: Computational Tools for the Implementation of Single-step Genomic Selection and Genome-wide Association with Ungenotyped Individuals in BLUPF90 Programs. Proceedings, 10th World Congress of Genetics Applied to Livestock Production.
Aguilar, I., Misztal, I., Johnson, D.-L., Legarra, A., Tsuruta, S., & Lawlor, T. J. 2010. Hot topic: A unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score, Journal of Dairy Science, 93, 743-752. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2730
doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2730
Banos, G. &Coffey, M.P. 2010. Short communication: characterization of the genome-wide linkage disequilibrium in 2 divergent selection lines of dairy cows, Journal of Dairy Science, 93, 2775–2778. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2613
doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2613
Bohmanova, J., Sargolzaei M. & Schenkel F.S. 2010. Characteristics of linkage disequilibrium in North American Holsteins, BMC Genomics, 11: 421. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-11-421 .
doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-421
Boligon, A. A., Long, N., Albuquerque, L. G., Weigel, K. A., Gianola, D., & Rosa, G. J. M. 2012. Comparison of selective genotyping strategies for prediction of breeding values in a population under- going selection, Journal of Animal Science, 90, 4716–4722. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2012-4857
Cesarani, A., Pocrnic, I., Macciotta, N. P. P., Fragomeni, B. O., Misztal I., & Lourenco, D. A. L. 2019. Bias in heritability estimates from genomic restricted maximum likelihood methods under different genotyping strategies. Journal of Animal Breeding & Genetics, 136, 40–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbg.12367
doi: 10.1111/jbg.12367
Chang, C. C., Chow, C. C., Tellier, L. C. A. M., Vattikuti, S., Purcell, S. M. & Lee, J. J. 2015) Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets, Giga Science, 4, https://www.cog-genomics.org/plink2 .
Christensen, O. F. & Lund, M. S. 2010. Genomic prediction when some animals are not genotyped. Genetics Selection Evolution, 42:2, https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-42-2 .
doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-42-2
Clark, S. A., Hickey, J. M., Daetwyler, H. D., & van der Werf, J. H. 2012. The importance of information on relatives for the prediction of genomic breeding values and the implications for the makeup of reference data sets in livestock breeding schemes, Genetics, selection, evolution, 44(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-44-4
doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-44-4
DAHDF. 2018. Annual report of department of animal husbandry, dairying and fisheries, ministry of agriculture, Government of India. Retrieved from ‘ http://dadf.gov.in/sites/default/filess/annual_report_17-18.pdf ’ on 22.05.2018
Darvasi, A., & Soller, M. 1992. Selective genotyping for determi- nation of linkage between a marker locus and a quantitative trait locus, Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 85, 353–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00222881
Gao, H., Madsen, P., Nielsen, U.S., Aamand, G.P., Su, G., Byskov, K. & Jensen, J. 2015. Including different groups of genotyped females for genomic prediction in a Nordic Jersey population, Journal of Dairy Science, 98, 9051-9059. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-9947
doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-9947
Garcia-Baccino, C., A., Legarra, A., Christensen, O. F., Misztal, I., Pocrnic, I., Vitezica, Z. G. & Cantet, R. J. C. 2017. Metafounders are related to F
Gonzalez-Recio, O., Alenda, R., Chang, Y.M., Weigel, K. & Gianola, D. 2006.Selection for female fertility using censored fertility traits and investigation of the relationship with milk production. Journal of Dairy Science, 89, 4438–4444. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72492-4
doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72492-4
Gonzalez-Recio, O., Lopez de Maturana, E.& Gutierrez, J.P. 2007. Inbreeding depression on female fertility and calving ease in Spanish dairy cattle, Journal of Dairy Science, 90, 5744–5752. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0203
doi: 10.3168/jds.2007-0203
Gowane, G. R., Lee, S. H., Clark, S., Moghaddar, N., Al-Mamun, H. A. & van der Werf, J. H. J. 2019a. Effect of selection and selective genotyping for creation of reference on bias and accuracy of genomic prediction. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 136, 390-407. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbg.12420
doi: 10.1111/jbg.12420
Gowane, G.R., Prince, L.L.L., Prakash, V., Sharma, R. C. & Kumar, A. 2016. Decline in Additive Genetic Variance for Live Weight and Greasy Fleece Weight in Bharat Merino Sheep, Agricultural research, 5, 316–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-016-0232-8
doi: 10.1007/s40003-016-0232-8
Gowane, G.R., Kumar, A. & Nimbkar, C. 2019b. Challenges and opportunities to livestock breeding programmes in India, Journal of Animal Breeding & Genetics, 136, 329-338. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbg.12391
doi: 10.1111/jbg.12391
Habier, D., Tetens, J., Seefried, F.R., Lichtner, P.& Thaller, G. 2010. The impact of genetic relationship information on genomic breeding values in German Holstein cattle, Genetics Selection Evolution, 42, 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-42-5
doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-42-5
Henderson, C. R. 1975. Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model. Biometrics, 31,423-447. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529430
doi: 10.2307/2529430
Henshall, J. M., & Goddard, M. E. 1999. Multiple‐trait mapping of quantitative trait loci after selective genotyping using logistic regression, Genetics, 151, 885–894. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/151.2.885
doi: 10.1093/genetics/151.2.885
Hickey, J. M. & Gorjanc, G. 2012. Simulated Data for Genomic Selection and Genome-Wide Association Studies Using a Combination of Coalescent and Gene Drop Methods. G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics, 2, 425–427. https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.111.001297
Huang, B. E., & Lin, D. Y. 2007. Efficient association mapping of quantitative trait loci with selective genotyping, The American Journal of Human Genetics, 80, 567–576. https://doi.org/10.1086/512727
doi: 10.1086/512727
Jenko, J., Wiggans, G.R., Cooper, T.A., Eaglen, S.A.E., Luff, W.G.L., Bichard, M., Pong-Wong R. & Woolliams J.A. 2017. Cow genotyping strategies for genomic selection in a small dairy cattle population, Journal of Dairy Science 100, 439-452. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-11479
doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-11479
Kearney, J.F., Wall, E., Villanueva, B.& Coffey, M.P. 2004. Inbreeding trends andapplication of optimized selection in the UK Holstein population, Journal of Dairy Science, 87, 3503–3509.
doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73485-2
Kennedy, B. W., Schaeffer, L. R., & Sorensen, D. A. 1988. Genetic properties of animal models, Journal of Dairy Science, 71, 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0302(88)79975-0
doi: 10.1016/S0022-0302(88)79975-0
Lebowitz, R. J., Soller, M., & Beckmann, J. S. 1987. Trait‐based analyses for the detection of linkage between marker loci and quantitative trait loci in crosses between inbred lines, Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 73, 556–562. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289194
doi: 10.1007/BF00289194
Lee, S. H. & van der Werf, J. H. J. 2016. MTG2: An efficient algorithm for multivariate linear mixed model analysis based on genomic information, Bioinformatics, 32, 1420-1422. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btw012
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw012
Legarra, A., Aguilar, I. & Misztal, I. 2009. A relationship matrix including full pedigree and genomic information, Journal of Dairy Science, 92, 4656–4663. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2061
doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2061
Legarra, A., Christensen, O.F., Vitezica, Z.G., Aguilar, I. &Misztal, I. 2015. Ancestral relationships using metafounders: Finite ancestral populations and across population relationships, Genetics, 200, 455-468. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.115.177014
doi: 10.1534/genetics.115.177014
Lourenco, D. A. L., I. Misztal, S. Tsuruta, I. Aguilar, T. J. Lawlor, S. Forni, & J. I. Weller. 2014. Are evaluations on young genotyped animals benefiting from the past generations? Journal of Dairy Science, 97, 3930–3942. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2013-7769
doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-7769
Misztal, I. 2008. BLUPF90 - a flexible mixed model program in Fortran 90. Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, August 2008.
Muranty, H., & Goffinet, B. 1997. Selective genotyping for location and estimation of the effect of a quantitative trait locus, Biometrics, 53, 629–643. https://doi.org/10.2307/2533963
doi: 10.2307/2533963
Mustafa, H., Ahmad, N., Heather, H. J.,Eui-soo, K., Khan,W. A., Ajmal, A.,Javed, K., Pasha, T. N., Ali, A., Kim, J. J.& Sonstegard, T. S. 2018. Whole genome study of linkage disequilibrium in Sahiwal cattle, South African Journal of Animal Science, 48, 354-360. https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v48i2.16
doi: 10.4314/sajas.v48i2.16
Meyer, K. 2021. Impact of missing pedigrees in single-step genomic evaluation, Animal Production Science, https://doi.org/10.1071/AN21045
doi: 10.1071/AN21045
Patry, C. & Ducrocq, V. 2011. Evidence of biases in genetic evaluations due to genomic preselection in dairy cattle, Journal of Dairy Science, 94, 1011-1020. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3804
doi: 10.3168/jds.2010-3804
Perez, B. C., Balieiro, J. C. C., Carvalheiro, R., Tirelo, F., Junior, G. A. O., Dementshuk, J. M., ... Ventura, R. V. 2018. Accounting for population structure in selective cow genotyping strategies, Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 136, 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbg.12369
Pocrnic, I., Lourenco, D. A. L., Bradford, H., Chen, C. & Miztal, I. 2017. Technical note: Impact of pedigree depth on convergence of single-step genomic BLUP in a purebred swine population, Journal of Animal Science, 95, 3391-3395. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2017.1581
doi: 10.2527/jas.2017.1581
Pryce J. E., Hayes, B. J. & Goddard, M. E. 2012. Genotyping dairy females can improve the reliability of genomic selection for young bulls and heifers and provide farmers with new management tools. ICAR Conference, Cork, Ireland. Accessed May 14, 2015. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4338
Sargolzaei M., Schenkel F.S., Jansen, G.B.& Schaeffer, L.R. 2008. Extent of linkage disequilibrium in Holstein cattle in North America, Journal of Dairy Science, 91, 2106–2117. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0553
doi: 10.3168/jds.2007-0553
Sargolzaei, M. & Schenkel, F. S. 2009. QMSim: a large-scale genome simulator for livestock. Bioinformatics, 25, 680-681. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp045
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp045
Sorensen, D. A. & Kennedy, B. W. 1984. Estimation of response to selection using least squares and mixed model methodology, Journal of Animal Science, 58, 1097–1103. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1984.5851097x
doi: 10.2527/jas1984.5851097x
Van der Werf, J. H. J., & de Boer, I. J. M. 1990. Estimation of additive genetic variance when base populations are selected, Journal of Animal Science, 68, 3124–3132. https://doi.org/10.2527/1990.68103124x .
doi: 10.2527/1990.68103124x
Van Gestel, S., Houwing‐Duistermaat, J. J., Adolfsson, R., van Duijn, C. M., & van Broeckhoven, C. 2000. Power of selective genotyping in genetic association analyses of quantitative traits, Behavioral Genetics, 30, 141–146. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1001907321955
doi: 10.1023/a:1001907321955
Van Raden, P. M., Tooker, M. E., & Cole, J. B. 2009b. Can you believe those genomic evaluations for young bulls? Journal of Dairy Science, 92, 314 (Abstr.)
Van Raden, P. M., Van Tassell, C. P., Wiggans, G. R., Sonstegard, T. S., Schnabel, R. D., Taylor J. F., & Schenkel, F. S. 2009a. Invited review: Reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls, Journal of Dairy Science, 92, 16–24. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1514
doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1514
Vitezica, Z. G., Aguilar, I., Misztal, I., &Legarra, A. 2011. Bias in genomic predictions for populations under selection, Genetics Research, 93, 357–366. https://doi.org/10.1017/S001667231100022X
doi: 10.1017/S001667231100022X
Xu, S., &Vogl, C. 2000. Maximum likelihood analysis of quantitative trait loci under selective genotyping, Heredity, 84, 525–537. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2540.2000.00653.x
Yang, H., & G. Su. 2016. Impact of phenotypic information of previous generations and depth of pedigree on estimates of genetic parameters and breeding values, Livestock Science, 187, 61–67. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2016.03.001
doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2016.03.001