On the use of wearable sensors as mobility biomarkers in the marketing authorization of new drugs: A regulatory perspective.
digital mobility outcomes
mobility biomarkers
mobility disability
regulatory qualification
wearable sensors
Journal
Frontiers in medicine
ISSN: 2296-858X
Titre abrégé: Front Med (Lausanne)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101648047
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
18
07
2022
accepted:
01
09
2022
entrez:
10
10
2022
pubmed:
11
10
2022
medline:
11
10
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The loss of mobility is a common trait in multiple health conditions (e.g., Parkinson's disease) and is associated with reduced quality of life. In this context, being able to monitor mobility in the real world, is important. Until recently, the technology was not mature enough for this; but today, miniaturized sensors and novel algorithms promise to monitor mobility accurately and continuously in the real world, also in pathological populations. However, before any such methodology can be employed to support the development and testing of new drugs in clinical trials, they need to be qualified by the competent regulatory agencies (e.g., European Medicines Agency). Nonetheless, to date, only very narrow scoped requests for regulatory qualification were successful. In this work, the Mobilise-D Consortium shares its positive experience with the European regulator, summarizing the two requests for Qualification Advice for the Mobilise-D methodologies submitted in October 2019 and June 2020, as well as the feedback received, which resulted in two Letters of Support publicly available for consultation on the website of the European Medicines Agency. Leveraging on this experience, we hereby propose a refined qualification strategy for the use of digital mobility outcome (DMO) measures as monitoring biomarkers for mobility in drug trials.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36213641
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.996903
pmc: PMC9533102
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
996903Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Viceconti, Tome, Dartee, Knezevic, Hernandez Penna, Mazzà, Caulfield, Garcia-Aymerich, Becker, Maetzler, Troosters, Sharrack, Davico, Corriol-Rohou, Rochester and the Mobilise-D Consortium.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2015 May;70(5):616-22
pubmed: 25512569
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 2;11(12):e050785
pubmed: 34857567
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Oct 20;20(20):
pubmed: 33092143
BMC Geriatr. 2014 Jan 29;14:12
pubmed: 24476510
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 15;11(4):e0153779
pubmed: 27082963
NPJ Digit Med. 2021 Oct 14;4(1):149
pubmed: 34650191
Arch Osteoporos. 2013;8:136
pubmed: 24113837
Digit Biomark. 2020 Nov 26;4(Suppl 1):13-27
pubmed: 33442578
BMJ. 2012 Aug 07;345:e4547
pubmed: 22872695
Lancet Neurol. 2019 Jul;18(7):697-708
pubmed: 30975519
Handb Clin Neurol. 2018;159:237-250
pubmed: 30482317
Respir Res. 2011 Mar 22;12:33
pubmed: 21426563
Digit Biomark. 2020 Sep 15;4(3):69-77
pubmed: 33083687