The prevalence of cardiovascular disease is higher in patients with bilateral low ankle-brachial index than in patients with unilateral low ankle-brachial index.
Ankle-brachial index
Atherosclerosis
Biomarker
Cardiovascular disease
Journal
Atherosclerosis
ISSN: 1879-1484
Titre abrégé: Atherosclerosis
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 0242543
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2022
11 2022
Historique:
received:
05
07
2022
revised:
09
09
2022
accepted:
27
09
2022
pubmed:
11
10
2022
medline:
28
10
2022
entrez:
10
10
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Ankle-brachial index (ABI) has been used as a vascular marker of atherosclerosis for cardiovascular risk assessment. However, it is unclear whether there is a difference in cardiovascular risk between patients with low ABI (<1.00) in one leg (unilateral low ABI) and patients with low ABIs in both legs (bilateral low ABI). Therefore, we investigated the associations of cardiovascular disease (CVD) with unilateral low ABI and bilateral low ABI to determine whether cardiovascular risk is higher in patients with bilateral low ABI than in patients with unilateral low ABI. We measured ABI in 2226 subjects. The prevalence of CVD was higher in patients with bilateral low ABI than in individuals with normal ABI (1.00-1.40) and patients with unilateral low ABI (49.2%, 25.7% and 17.0%, respectively; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that bilateral low ABI was significantly associated with an increased risk of CVD (OR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.16 to 4.54; p = 0.02), whereas there was no significant association between unilateral low ABI and CVD (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.47 to 1.46; p = 0.51). Propensity score matching analysis showed that the prevalence of CVD was significantly higher in patients with bilateral low ABI than in patients with unilateral low ABI (45.5% vs. 27.3%, p = 0.02). Cardiovascular risk may be higher in patients with bilateral low ABI than in patients with unilateral low ABI. More attention should be paid to whether a low ABI is present in one leg or in both legs for more precise cardiovascular risk assessment.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
Ankle-brachial index (ABI) has been used as a vascular marker of atherosclerosis for cardiovascular risk assessment. However, it is unclear whether there is a difference in cardiovascular risk between patients with low ABI (<1.00) in one leg (unilateral low ABI) and patients with low ABIs in both legs (bilateral low ABI). Therefore, we investigated the associations of cardiovascular disease (CVD) with unilateral low ABI and bilateral low ABI to determine whether cardiovascular risk is higher in patients with bilateral low ABI than in patients with unilateral low ABI.
METHODS
We measured ABI in 2226 subjects.
RESULTS
The prevalence of CVD was higher in patients with bilateral low ABI than in individuals with normal ABI (1.00-1.40) and patients with unilateral low ABI (49.2%, 25.7% and 17.0%, respectively; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that bilateral low ABI was significantly associated with an increased risk of CVD (OR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.16 to 4.54; p = 0.02), whereas there was no significant association between unilateral low ABI and CVD (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.47 to 1.46; p = 0.51). Propensity score matching analysis showed that the prevalence of CVD was significantly higher in patients with bilateral low ABI than in patients with unilateral low ABI (45.5% vs. 27.3%, p = 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS
Cardiovascular risk may be higher in patients with bilateral low ABI than in patients with unilateral low ABI. More attention should be paid to whether a low ABI is present in one leg or in both legs for more precise cardiovascular risk assessment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36215802
pii: S0021-9150(22)01452-6
doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2022.09.012
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
8-14Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.