What Do Underrepresented in Medicine Junior Family Medicine Faculty Value From a Faculty Development Experience?
Journal
Family medicine
ISSN: 1938-3800
Titre abrégé: Fam Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8306464
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2022
10 2022
Historique:
entrez:
11
10
2022
pubmed:
12
10
2022
medline:
14
10
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
While there is increased attention to underrepresented in medicine (URiM) faculty and students, little is known about what they value in faculty development experiences. We performed a URiM-focused, 3-day family medicine faculty development program and then collected program evaluation forms. The program evaluations had open-ended questions and a reflection on the activity. We used inductive open coding using NVivo software. We analyzed open-ended responses and reflections, and identified themes. Seven participants provided reflections on the workshop and responses to the evaluation forms. Analysis revealed four major themes in the learners' responses and reflections: (1) personalizing learning, (2) impacting career trajectories, (3) clarifying the writing process, and (4) creating a safe place, with frequencies of 28.2%, 26.7%, 23.6%, and 20.9%, respectively. Although this faculty development experience was designed to teach writing skills to URiM junior faculty, their collective responses indicate that they found value beyond the skills taught and appreciated the approach taken in this activity.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
While there is increased attention to underrepresented in medicine (URiM) faculty and students, little is known about what they value in faculty development experiences.
METHODS
We performed a URiM-focused, 3-day family medicine faculty development program and then collected program evaluation forms. The program evaluations had open-ended questions and a reflection on the activity. We used inductive open coding using NVivo software. We analyzed open-ended responses and reflections, and identified themes.
RESULTS
Seven participants provided reflections on the workshop and responses to the evaluation forms. Analysis revealed four major themes in the learners' responses and reflections: (1) personalizing learning, (2) impacting career trajectories, (3) clarifying the writing process, and (4) creating a safe place, with frequencies of 28.2%, 26.7%, 23.6%, and 20.9%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
Although this faculty development experience was designed to teach writing skills to URiM junior faculty, their collective responses indicate that they found value beyond the skills taught and appreciated the approach taken in this activity.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36219431
doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2022.895447
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM