Transcatheter Patent Foramen Ovale Closure in Stroke Patients with Thrombophilia: Current Status and Future Perspectives.
Foramen ovale, patent
Ischemic stroke
Thrombophilia
Journal
Journal of stroke
ISSN: 2287-6391
Titre abrégé: J Stroke
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101602023
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2022
Sep 2022
Historique:
received:
24
05
2022
accepted:
05
09
2022
entrez:
12
10
2022
pubmed:
13
10
2022
medline:
13
10
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Transcatheter patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure is a safe and effective treatment for secondary prevention after a PFO-associated stroke as demonstrated in multiple large randomized clinical trials. However, these trials excluded a significant proportion of patients who could have benefited from percutaneous PFO closure due to coexisting potential confounders such as additional thromboembolic risk factors, namely thrombophilia. Since scarce and conflicting data existed on such patients, current clinical management guidelines on patients with PFO mainly recommended against PFO closure in patients with thrombophilia and failed to provide any recommendation on the type and duration of antithrombotic treatment after transcatheter PFO closure. In the past 2 years, there has been new evidence supporting transcatheter PFO closure as a clinically meaningful alternative (vs. medical treatment) in this high-risk group of patients, along with additional data supporting the important role of systematic screening for thrombophilia in PFO-associated cerebrovascular events. This review article provides an updated overview of the incidence, clinical characteristics and outcomes of PFO closure in patients with thrombophilia, also commenting on the most appropriate medical treatment after PFO closure and future perspectives in the field.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36221936
pii: jos.2022.01697
doi: 10.5853/jos.2022.01697
pmc: PMC9561223
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
335-344Subventions
Organisme : Abbott Vascular Canada
Références
JAMA. 2021 May 25;325(20):2116-2118
pubmed: 34032839
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2004 Jan;61(1):123-7
pubmed: 14696171
Neurol Clin. 2015 May;33(2):501-13
pubmed: 25907919
Br J Haematol. 2022 Aug;198(3):443-458
pubmed: 35645034
JAMA Neurol. 2020 Jul 1;77(7):878-886
pubmed: 32282016
Stroke. 2003 Jan;34(1):28-33
pubmed: 12511746
J Interv Cardiol. 2021 Sep 10;2021:6955791
pubmed: 34602869
J Neurol Sci. 2017 Jun 15;377:227-233
pubmed: 28477701
Stroke. 2009 Jul;40(7):2349-55
pubmed: 19443800
Cardiology. 2021;146(3):375-383
pubmed: 33582661
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Dec 14;13(23):2745-2752
pubmed: 33303111
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Feb 1;79(2):322-30
pubmed: 21523898
Thromb Haemost. 2009 May;101(5):813-7
pubmed: 19404532
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Oct;98(4):800-807
pubmed: 34132472
Stroke. 2021 May;52(5):1874-1884
pubmed: 33874743
Cardiovasc Res. 2022 Feb 21;118(3):716-731
pubmed: 33483737
Stroke. 2007 Jul;38(7):2070-3
pubmed: 17525392
Blood. 2003 Mar 1;101(5):1827-32
pubmed: 12393574
Thromb Haemost. 2019 Nov;119(11):1839-1848
pubmed: 31378004
Thromb Haemost. 2007 Oct;98(4):906-7
pubmed: 17938820
Neurology. 2020 May 19;94(20):876-885
pubmed: 32350058
Eur Heart J. 2019 Oct 7;40(38):3182-3195
pubmed: 30358849
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2003 Apr;14(3):261-8
pubmed: 12695749
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019 Apr;28(4):882-889
pubmed: 30595511
Am J Cardiol. 2004 Oct 15;94(8):1012-6
pubmed: 15476614
EuroIntervention. 2018 Oct 20;14(8):857-867
pubmed: 29901447
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 May;2(5):404-11
pubmed: 19463462
Int J Cardiol. 2007 Sep 3;120(3):357-62
pubmed: 17166607
BMJ. 2022 Feb 9;376:e063161
pubmed: 35140114