Active tactile discrimination is coupled with and modulated by the cardiac cycle.
active inference
active sensing
cardiac cycle
human
interoception
neuroscience
predictive coding
tactile discrimination
touch
Journal
eLife
ISSN: 2050-084X
Titre abrégé: Elife
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101579614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 10 2022
12 10 2022
Historique:
received:
23
02
2022
accepted:
11
10
2022
pubmed:
13
10
2022
medline:
22
11
2022
entrez:
12
10
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Perception and cognition are modulated by the phase of the cardiac signal in which the stimuli are presented. This has been shown by locking the presentation of stimuli to distinct cardiac phases. However, in everyday life sensory information is not presented in this passive and phase-locked manner, instead we actively move and control our sensors to perceive the world. Whether active sensing is coupled and modulated with the cardiac cycle remains largely unknown. Here, we recorded the electrocardiograms of human participants while they actively performed a tactile grating orientation task. We show that the duration of subjects' touch varied as a function of the cardiac phase in which they initiated it. Touches initiated in the systole phase were held for longer periods of time than touches initiated in the diastole phase. This effect was most pronounced when elongating the duration of the touches to sense the most difficult gratings. Conversely, while touches in the control condition were coupled to the cardiac cycle, their length did not vary as a function of the phase in which these were initiated. Our results reveal that we actively spend more time sensing during systole periods, the cardiac phase associated with lower perceptual sensitivity (vs. diastole). In line with interoceptive inference accounts, these results indicate that we actively adjust the acquisition of sense data to our internal bodily cycles. Most of what is known about human senses comes from experiments under laboratory conditions where participants stay still and stimuli are presented to them by the scientists. However, this approach does not reflect what happens in real life as we move around, changing the position of our eyes, heads and hands, to actively sense the world. Our perception also changes depending on what is going on inside our bodies and minds at any one time. For instance, our sensitivity to touch varies during the two phases of our heartbeat: people are less perceptive to being touched during systole (when the heart ejects blood), compared to when they are touched during diastole (when the heart refills with blood). But it was unclear if this relationship influences how we actively touch and sense objects. For instance, do people seek touch in a particular phase of their heartbeat, and how does this change their response to the object? To investigate, Galvez-Pol et al. traced people’s heartbeats while they actively touched different objects. Without looking, the participants had to work out whether the objects had vertical or horizontal grooves. Although they did not start their touches in a specific phase of the heartbeat, their hearts did influence their behaviour. If they started the touch during systole, they held their fingers over the object for longer. The effect was especially noticeable when it was difficult to discriminate the objects’ grooves. Galvez-Pol et al. reasoned that this was down to participants having to compensate for the loss in touch sensitivity during the systole phase of their heartbeat. This suggests that people actively adjust how they acquire sensory information, such as touch, based on how their bodily functions alter their senses. These findings provide a starting point for future studies investigating how internal bodily fluctuations impact how we sense and respond to things in real world scenarios. This could potentially shed light on the differences between the way neurotypical and neurodivergent individuals sense the world.
Autres résumés
Type: plain-language-summary
(eng)
Most of what is known about human senses comes from experiments under laboratory conditions where participants stay still and stimuli are presented to them by the scientists. However, this approach does not reflect what happens in real life as we move around, changing the position of our eyes, heads and hands, to actively sense the world. Our perception also changes depending on what is going on inside our bodies and minds at any one time. For instance, our sensitivity to touch varies during the two phases of our heartbeat: people are less perceptive to being touched during systole (when the heart ejects blood), compared to when they are touched during diastole (when the heart refills with blood). But it was unclear if this relationship influences how we actively touch and sense objects. For instance, do people seek touch in a particular phase of their heartbeat, and how does this change their response to the object? To investigate, Galvez-Pol et al. traced people’s heartbeats while they actively touched different objects. Without looking, the participants had to work out whether the objects had vertical or horizontal grooves. Although they did not start their touches in a specific phase of the heartbeat, their hearts did influence their behaviour. If they started the touch during systole, they held their fingers over the object for longer. The effect was especially noticeable when it was difficult to discriminate the objects’ grooves. Galvez-Pol et al. reasoned that this was down to participants having to compensate for the loss in touch sensitivity during the systole phase of their heartbeat. This suggests that people actively adjust how they acquire sensory information, such as touch, based on how their bodily functions alter their senses. These findings provide a starting point for future studies investigating how internal bodily fluctuations impact how we sense and respond to things in real world scenarios. This could potentially shed light on the differences between the way neurotypical and neurodivergent individuals sense the world.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36222653
doi: 10.7554/eLife.78126
pii: 78126
pmc: PMC9671494
doi:
pii:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© 2022, Galvez-Pol et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
AG, PV, JV, JK No competing interests declared
Références
Psychophysiology. 2007 May;44(3):459-68
pubmed: 17433098
Cognition. 2021 Dec;217:104907
pubmed: 34563865
J Neurophysiol. 2018 Nov 1;120(5):2423-2429
pubmed: 30133382
Curr Biol. 2017 Mar 6;27(5):688-696
pubmed: 28216320
Neuroimage. 2021 Sep;238:118247
pubmed: 34111514
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Jun;150(6):1165-1176
pubmed: 33180532
Chest. 1981 Nov;80(5):613-7
pubmed: 7297154
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Nov 12;366(1581):2989-95
pubmed: 21969680
Front Behav Neurosci. 2014 Feb 20;8:50
pubmed: 24600364
Int J Psychophysiol. 2021 Apr;162:104-111
pubmed: 33582219
Nat Commun. 2017 Jan 17;8:13854
pubmed: 28094772
J Neurosci. 2016 Jan 27;36(4):1237-41
pubmed: 26818511
Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 9;11(1):16150
pubmed: 34373488
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2018 Jun;3(6):501-513
pubmed: 29884281
Psychophysiology. 2019 Oct;56(10):e13424
pubmed: 31245848
Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Jan;20(1):34-46
pubmed: 26628111
Biomed Eng Online. 2011 Sep 09;10:77
pubmed: 21906317
Sci Rep. 2018 Jun 14;8(1):9136
pubmed: 29904123
PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Sep 13;18(9):e1010490
pubmed: 36099315
J Neurophysiol. 2005 Sep;94(3):1904-11
pubmed: 15901760
Neuroimage. 2019 Aug 15;197:502-511
pubmed: 31051293
Biol Psychol. 2015 Jan;104:65-74
pubmed: 25451381
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017 Nov;12(6):1123-1128
pubmed: 28853993
Neural Comput. 2017 Jan;29(1):1-49
pubmed: 27870614
J Neurophysiol. 1991 Mar;65(3):531-46
pubmed: 2051193
J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1977 Feb;91(1):189-202
pubmed: 838914
Cardiovasc Eng. 2010 Dec;10(4):235-45
pubmed: 21113800
Cortex. 2022 Jun;151:176-187
pubmed: 35430451
Neuropsychologia. 2000;38(2):115-24
pubmed: 10660224
Psychophysiology. 2011 Jul;48(7):927-36
pubmed: 21143610
Br J Sports Med. 1987 Mar;21(1):33-6
pubmed: 3580727
Psychophysiology. 2012 Feb;49(2):193-7
pubmed: 22092290
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1975 Nov;1(4):418-428
pubmed: 1185127
J Neurosci. 2021 Jun 9;41(23):5102-5114
pubmed: 33926998
Psychophysiology. 2019 May;56(5):e13322
pubmed: 30620083
Neuroimage. 2018 Jul 1;174:153-163
pubmed: 29548846
Cognition. 2020 Mar;196:104149
pubmed: 31786324
Elife. 2016 Feb 10;5:
pubmed: 26880546
Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Sep;30(9):2722-30
pubmed: 19172650
Psychophysiology. 2001 Jul;38(4):712-8
pubmed: 11446585
Cortex. 2020 Apr;125:332-344
pubmed: 32120169
Psychophysiology. 2016 Nov;53(11):1702-1711
pubmed: 27450530
Acad Radiol. 2003 Jun;10(6):638-43
pubmed: 12809417
Elife. 2021 Dec 14;10:
pubmed: 34904567
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1993 May-Jun;88(3):163-72
pubmed: 7684965
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2003 Dec;74(4):395-400
pubmed: 14768841
Trends Neurosci. 2021 Jan;44(1):29-38
pubmed: 33378654
J Neurosci. 2014 May 7;34(19):6573-82
pubmed: 24806682
Nat Neurosci. 2014 Apr;17(4):612-8
pubmed: 24609466
Biol Psychol. 2022 Feb;168:108262
pubmed: 35026353
J Neurosci. 2022 Jan 26;42(4):643-656
pubmed: 34853084
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 13;13(9):e0203212
pubmed: 30212484
Cogn Emot. 2021 Mar;35(2):400-408
pubmed: 33073669
Trends Neurosci. 2021 Jan;44(1):17-28
pubmed: 33378653
J Neurophysiol. 2004 Jun;91(6):2429-36
pubmed: 14736865
Trends Cogn Sci. 2019 Jun;23(6):488-509
pubmed: 31047813
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 May 12;117(19):10575-10584
pubmed: 32341167
Nature. 2013 May 9;497(7448):205-10
pubmed: 23624373
Neuron. 2013 Feb 20;77(4):624-38
pubmed: 23439117
Nat Hum Behav. 2019 May;3(5):501-512
pubmed: 31089297
BMC Biol. 2019 Dec 12;17(1):103
pubmed: 31831016
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35091
pubmed: 22529975
Curr Biol. 2002 Feb 5;12(3):233-6
pubmed: 11839277
Psychophysiology. 2006 May;43(3):314-9
pubmed: 16805871
Psychol Rev. 2022 Aug 18;:
pubmed: 35980689
Elife. 2020 Jan 24;9:
pubmed: 31975686
J Neurosci. 2016 May 4;36(18):5115-27
pubmed: 27147663
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Aug 15;97(17):9777-82
pubmed: 10944237
Psychol Rev. 1962 Nov;69:477-91
pubmed: 13947730
J Neurosci Methods. 2004 Mar 15;134(1):9-21
pubmed: 15102499