Global hotspots for soil nature conservation.
Journal
Nature
ISSN: 1476-4687
Titre abrégé: Nature
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0410462
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2022
10 2022
Historique:
received:
17
11
2021
accepted:
30
08
2022
pubmed:
13
10
2022
medline:
29
10
2022
entrez:
12
10
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Soils are the foundation of all terrestrial ecosystems
Identifiants
pubmed: 36224389
doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05292-x
pii: 10.1038/s41586-022-05292-x
doi:
Substances chimiques
Soil
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
693-698Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
Références
Bardgett, R. D. & van der Putten, W. H. Belowground biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Nature 515, 505–511 (2014).
pubmed: 25428498
doi: 10.1038/nature13855
Guerra, C. A. et al. Tracking, targeting, and conserving soil biodiversity. Science 371, 239–241 (2021).
pubmed: 33446546
doi: 10.1126/science.abd7926
Wall, D. H. et al. (eds) Soil Ecology and Ecosystem Services (Oxford University Press, 2012).
Jansson, J. K. & Hofmockel, K. S. Soil microbiomes and climate change. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 18, 35–46 (2020).
pubmed: 31586158
doi: 10.1038/s41579-019-0265-7
de Vries, F. T. et al. Soil food web properties explain ecosystem services across European land use systems. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 14296–14301 (2013).
pubmed: 23940339
pmcid: 3761618
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1305198110
Adhikari, K. & Hartemink, A. E. Linking soils to ecosystem services—a global review. Geoderma 262, 101–111 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.08.009
Pereira, P., Bogunovic, I., Muñoz-Rojas, M. & Brevik, E. C. Soil ecosystem services, sustainability, valuation and management. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sci. Health 5, 7–13 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.coesh.2017.12.003
Wall, D. H., Nielsen, U. N. & Six, J. Soil biodiversity and human health. Nature 528, 69–76 (2015).
Delgado-Baquerizo, M. et al. The proportion of soil-borne pathogens increases with warming at the global scale. Nat. Clim. Chang. 10, 550–554 (2020).
doi: 10.1038/s41558-020-0759-3
Rillig, M. C. et al. The role of multiple global change factors in driving soil functions and microbial biodiversity. Science 366, 886–890 (2019).
pubmed: 31727838
pmcid: 6941939
doi: 10.1126/science.aay2832
Guerra, C. A. et al. Global vulnerability of soil ecosystems to erosion. Landsc. Ecol. 35, 823–842 (2020).
pubmed: 32587435
pmcid: 7316572
doi: 10.1007/s10980-020-00984-z
Geisen, S., Wall, D. H. & van der Putten, W. H. Challenges and opportunities for soil biodiversity in the Anthropocene. Curr. Biol. 29, R1036–R1044 (2019).
pubmed: 31593662
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.08.007
Jung, M. et al. Areas of global importance for conserving terrestrial biodiversity, carbon and water. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 1499–1509 (2021).
pubmed: 34429536
doi: 10.1038/s41559-021-01528-7
Xu, H. et al. Ensuring effective implementation of the post-2020 global biodiversity targets. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 411–418 (2021).
pubmed: 33495589
doi: 10.1038/s41559-020-01375-y
Díaz, S. et al. (eds). Summary for Policymakers of the Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES, 2019); https://zenodo.org/record/3553579#.YyhIsXbMK70
Phillips, H. R. P. et al. Global distribution of earthworm diversity. Science 366, 480–485 (2019).
pubmed: 31649197
pmcid: 7335308
doi: 10.1126/science.aax4851
van den Hoogen, J. et al. Soil nematode abundance and functional group composition at a global scale. Nature 572, 194–198 (2019).
pubmed: 31341281
doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1418-6
Delgado-baquerizo, M. et al. A global atlas of the dominant bacteria found in soil. Science 325, 320–325 (2018).
doi: 10.1126/science.aap9516
Tedersoo, L. et al. Global diversity and geography of soil fungi. Science 346, 1256688 (2014).
pubmed: 25430773
doi: 10.1126/science.1256688
Xu, X., Thornton, P. E. & Post, W. M. A global analysis of soil microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in terrestrial ecosystems: global soil microbial biomass C, N and P. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 22, 737–749 (2013).
doi: 10.1111/geb.12029
Djukic, I. et al. Early stage litter decomposition across biomes. Sci. Total Environ. 628–629, 1369–1394 (2018).
Guerra, C. A. et al. Global projections of the soil microbiome in the Anthropocene. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 30, 987–999 (2021).
pubmed: 33867861
doi: 10.1111/geb.13273
Cameron, E. K. et al. Global mismatches in aboveground and belowground biodiversity. Conserv. Biol. 33, 1187–1192 (2019).
pubmed: 30868645
doi: 10.1111/cobi.13311
El Moujahid, L. et al. Effect of plant diversity on the diversity of soil organic compounds. PLoS One 12, e0170494 (2017).
pubmed: 28166250
pmcid: 5293253
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170494
Guerra, C. A. et al. Blind spots in global soil biodiversity and ecosystem function research. Nat. Commun. 11, 3870 (2020).
pubmed: 32747621
pmcid: 7400591
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17688-2
Fierer, N. & Jackson, R. B. The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 626–631 (2006).
pubmed: 16407148
pmcid: 1334650
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0507535103
Tedersoo, L. et al. Regional-scale in-depth analysis of soil fungal diversity reveals strong pH and plant species effects in Northern Europe. Front. Microbiol. 11, 1953 (2020).
pubmed: 33013735
pmcid: 7510051
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01953
Popp, A. et al. Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways. Glob. Environ. Change 42, 331–345 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.002
Dornelas, M. et al. Assemblage time series reveal biodiversity change but not systematic loss. Science 344, 296–299 (2014).
pubmed: 24744374
doi: 10.1126/science.1248484
Egoh, B., Reyers, B., Rouget, M., Bode, M. & Richardson, D. M. Spatial congruence between biodiversity and ecosystem services in South Africa. Biol. Conserv. 142, 553–562 (2009).
doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.11.009
Jürgens, N. et al. The BIOTA Biodiversity Observatories in Africa—a standardized framework for large-scale environmental monitoring. Environ. Monit. Assess. 184, 655–678 (2012).
pubmed: 21448628
doi: 10.1007/s10661-011-1993-y
Wyborn, C. & Evans, M. C. Conservation needs to break free from global priority mapping. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 1322–1324 (2021).
pubmed: 34426678
doi: 10.1038/s41559-021-01540-x
Hautier, Y. et al. Local loss and spatial homogenization of plant diversity reduce ecosystem multifunctionality. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 50–56 (2018).
pubmed: 29203922
doi: 10.1038/s41559-017-0395-0
Zhou, Z., Wang, C. & Luo, Y. Meta-analysis of the impacts of global change factors on soil microbial diversity and functionality. Nat. Commun. 11, 3072 (2020).
pubmed: 32555185
pmcid: 7300008
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16881-7
Eisenhauer, N., Schulz, W., Scheu, S. & Jousset, A. Niche dimensionality links biodiversity and invasibility of microbial communities. Funct. Ecol. 27, 282–288 (2013).
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2012.02060.x
Wagg, C., Bender, S. F., Widmer, F. & van der Heijden, M. G. A. Soil biodiversity and soil community composition determine ecosystem multifunctionality. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 5266–5270 (2014).
pubmed: 24639507
pmcid: 3986181
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1320054111
Haines-Young, R. H. & Potschin, M. B. in Ecosystems Ecology: A New Synthesis (eds Raffaelli, D. G. & Frid, C. L. J.) Ch. 6 (2012).
Smith, L. C. et al. Large‐scale drivers of relationships between soil microbial properties and organic carbon across Europe. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 30, 2070–2083 (2021).
doi: 10.1111/geb.13371
Keesstra, S. et al. The superior effect of nature based solutions in land management for enhancing ecosystem services. Sci. Total Environ. 610-611, 997–1009 (2018).
pubmed: 28838037
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.077
Le Provost, G. et al. Contrasting responses of above- and belowground diversity to multiple components of land-use intensity. Nat. Commun. 12, 3918 (2021).
pubmed: 34168127
pmcid: 8225671
doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23931-1
Tanneberger, F. et al. The power of nature‐based solutions: how peatlands can help us to achieve key EU sustainability objectives. Adv. Sustain. Syst. 5, 2000146 (2021).
doi: 10.1002/adsu.202000146
Johnston, A. et al. Observed and predicted effects of climate change on species abundance in protected areas. Nat. Clim. Chang. 3, 1055–1061 (2013).
doi: 10.1038/nclimate2035
Hannah, L. et al. Protected area needs in a changing climate. Front. Ecol. Environ. 5, 131–138 (2007).
doi: 10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[131:PANIAC]2.0.CO;2
Gallardo, B. et al. Protected areas offer refuge from invasive species spreading under climate change. Glob. Chang. Biol. 23, 5331–5343 (2017).
pubmed: 28758293
doi: 10.1111/gcb.13798
O’Neill, B. C. et al. The roads ahead: narratives for shared socioeconomic pathways describing world futures in the 21st century. Glob. Environ. Change 42, 169–180 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.01.004
Fedele, G., Donatti, C. I., Bornacelly, I. & Hole, D. G. Nature-dependent people: mapping human direct use of nature for basic needs across the tropics. Glob. Environ. Change 71, 102368 (2021).
Visconti, P. et al. Protected area targets post-2020. Science 364, 239–241 (2019).
pubmed: 30975769
doi: 10.1126/science.aav6886
Allan, J. R. et al. The minimum land area requiring conservation attention to safeguard biodiversity. Science 376, 1094–1101 (2022).
pubmed: 35653463
doi: 10.1126/science.abl9127
Maestre, F. T. et al. Plant species richness and ecosystem multifunctionality in global drylands. Science 335, 214–218 (2012).
pubmed: 22246775
pmcid: 3558739
doi: 10.1126/science.1215442
Delgado-Baquerizo, M. et al. Changes in belowground biodiversity during ecosystem development. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 116, 6891–6896 (2019).
pubmed: 30877251
pmcid: 6452688
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1818400116
Mace, G. M. Whose conservation? Science 345, 1558–1560 (2014).
pubmed: 25258063
doi: 10.1126/science.1254704
Amaral-Zettler, L. A., McCliment, E. A., Ducklow, H. W. & Huse, S. M. A method for studying protistan diversity using massively parallel sequencing of V9 hypervariable regions of small-subunit ribosomal RNA genes. PLoS One 4, e6372 (2009).
pubmed: 19633714
pmcid: 2711349
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006372
Stoeck, T. et al. Multiple marker parallel tag environmental DNA sequencing reveals a highly complex eukaryotic community in marine anoxic water. Mol. Ecol. 19, 21–31 (2010).
pubmed: 20331767
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04480.x
Ramirez, K. S. et al. Biogeographic patterns in below-ground diversity in New York City’s Central Park are similar to those observed globally. Proc. Biol. Sci. 281, 20141988 (2014).
pubmed: 25274366
pmcid: 4213626
Caporaso, J. G. et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods 7, 335–336 (2010).
pubmed: 20383131
pmcid: 3156573
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.f.303
Edgar, R. C. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26, 2460–2461 (2010).
pubmed: 20709691
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461
Edgar, R. C. & Flyvbjerg, H. Error filtering, pair assembly and error correction for next-generation sequencing reads. Bioinformatics 31, 3476–3482 (2015).
pubmed: 26139637
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv401
Edgar, R. C. UNOISE2: improved error-correction for Illumina 16S and ITS amplicon sequencing. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/081257 (2016).
Tedersoo, L. et al. Towards understanding diversity, endemicity and global change vulnerability of soil fungi. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.03.17.484796 (2022).
Quast, C. et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D590–D596 (2013).
pubmed: 23193283
doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1219
Delgado-Baquerizo, M. et al. Global homogenization of the structure and function in the soil microbiome of urban greenspaces. Sci. Adv. 7, eabg5809 (2021).
pubmed: 34244148
pmcid: 8270485
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abg5809
Phillips, H. R. P., Heintz-Buschart, A. & Eisenhauer, N. Putting soil invertebrate diversity on the map. Mol. Ecol. 29, 655–657 (2020).
pubmed: 32012394
pmcid: 7305945
doi: 10.1111/mec.15371
Xiong, W. et al. A global overview of the trophic structure within microbiomes across ecosystems. Environ. Int. 151, 106438 (2021).
pubmed: 33621916
doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106438
Drummond, A. J. et al. Evaluating a multigene environmental DNA approach for biodiversity assessment. Gigascience 4, 46 (2015).
pubmed: 26445670
pmcid: 4595072
doi: 10.1186/s13742-015-0086-1
Oliverio, A. M., Gan, H., Wickings, K. & Fierer, N. A DNA metabarcoding approach to characterize soil arthropod communities. Soil Biol. Biochem. 125, 37–43 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.06.026
Horton, D. J., Kershner, M. W. & Blackwood, C. B. Suitability of PCR primers for characterizing invertebrate communities from soil and leaf litter targeting metazoan 18S ribosomal or cytochrome oxidase I (COI) genes. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 80, 43–48 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2017.04.003
Delgado-Baquerizo, M. et al. Multiple elements of soil biodiversity drive ecosystem functions across biomes. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 210–220 (2020).
pubmed: 32015427
doi: 10.1038/s41559-019-1084-y
Carter, M. R. & Gregorich, E. G. (eds) Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis (CRC Press, 2007).
Sparks, D. L. et al. (eds) Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 3: Chemical Methods (Wiley, 2020).
Nguyen, N. H. et al. FUNGuild: an open annotation tool for parsing fungal community datasets by ecological guild. Fungal Ecol. 20, 241–248 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.funeco.2015.06.006
Bell, C. W. et al. High-throughput fluorometric measurement of potential soil extracellular enzyme activities. J. Vis. Exp. 81, e50961 (2013).
Wang, L. et al. Diversifying livestock promotes multidiversity and multifunctionality in managed grasslands. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 116, 6187–6192 (2019).
pubmed: 30850539
pmcid: 6442565
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1807354116
Durán, J., Delgado-Baquerizo, M., Rodríguez, A., Covelo, F. & Gallardo, A. Ionic exchange membranes (IEMs): a good indicator of soil inorganic N production. Soil Biol. Biochem. 57, 964–968 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.07.016
Breiman, L. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45, 5–32 (2001).
doi: 10.1023/A:1010933404324
Friedman, J. H. Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Ann. Stat. 29, 1189–1232 (2001).
doi: 10.1214/aos/1013203451
Sharma, N. XGBoost. The Extreme Gradient Boosting for Mining Applications (GRIN Verlag, 2018).
Chen, T. & Guestrin, C. XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system. In Proc. 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining 785–794 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2016).
Wilson. ParBayesianOptimization: Parallel Bayesian Optimization of Hyperparameters. R version 1 https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ParBayesianOptimization (2021).
Hastie, T., Friedman, J. & Tibshirani, R. The Elements of Statistical Learning (Springer, 2001).
Jackson, D. A. & Chen, Y. Robust principal component analysis and outlier detection with ecological data. Environmetrics 15, 129–139 (2004).
doi: 10.1002/env.628
Breiman, L. Bagging predictors. Mach. Learn. 24, 123–140 (1996).
doi: 10.1007/BF00058655
Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Stone, C. J. & Olshen, R. A. Classification and Regression Trees (Routledge, 1984).
Ord, J. K. & Getis, A. Local spatial autocorrelation statistics: distributional issues and an application. Geogr. Anal. 27, 286–306 (2010).
doi: 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00912.x
Getis, A. & Ord, J. K. The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geogr. Anal. 24, 189–206 (2010).
doi: 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1992.tb00261.x
Prasannakumar, V., Vijith, H., Charutha, R. & Geetha, N. Spatio-temporal clustering of road accidents: GIS based analysis and assessment. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 21, 317–325 (2011).
doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.07.020
Lin, G. Comparing spatial clustering tests based on rare to common spatial events. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 28, 691–699 (2004).
doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2003.07.002
Araújo, M. B. et al. Standards for distribution models in biodiversity assessments. Sci. Adv. 5, eaat4858 (2019).
pubmed: 30746437
pmcid: 6357756
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aat4858
Rousseeuw, P. J. & van Zomeren, B. C. Unmasking multivariate outliers and leverage points. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 85, 633–639 (1990).
doi: 10.1080/01621459.1990.10474920
Hempel, S., Frieler, K., Warszawski, L., Schewe, J. & Piontek, F. A trend-preserving bias correction—the ISI-MIP approach. Earth Syst. Dyn. 4, 219–236 (2013).
doi: 10.5194/esd-4-219-2013
Lawrence, D. M. et al. The Land Use Model Intercomparison Project (LUMIP) contribution to CMIP6: rationale and experimental design. Geosci. Model Dev. 9, 2973–2998 (2016).
doi: 10.5194/gmd-9-2973-2016
Kim, H. et al. A protocol for an intercomparison of biodiversity and ecosystem services models using harmonized land-use and climate scenarios. Geosci. Model Dev. 11, 4537–4562 (2018).
Dufresne, J.-L. et al. Climate change projections using the IPSL-CM5 Earth System Model: from CMIP3 to CMIP5. Clim. Dyn. 40, 2123–2165 (2013).
doi: 10.1007/s00382-012-1636-1
Hurtt, G. C. et al. Harmonization of land-use scenarios for the period 1500–2100: 600 years of global gridded annual land-use transitions, wood harvest, and resulting secondary lands. Clim. Change 109, 117 (2011).
doi: 10.1007/s10584-011-0153-2
Hurtt, G. C. et al. Harmonization of global land use change and management for the period 850–2100 (LUH2) for CMIP6. Geosci. Model Dev. 13, 5425–5464 (2020).
doi: 10.5194/gmd-13-5425-2020
Riahi, K. et al. The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: an overview. Glob. Environ. Change 42, 153–168 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009
O’Neill, B. C. et al. A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared socioeconomic pathways. Clim. Change 122, 387–400 (2014).
doi: 10.1007/s10584-013-0905-2
Newbold, T. et al. Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity. Nature 520, 45–50 (2015).
pubmed: 25832402
doi: 10.1038/nature14324
Powers, R. P. & Jetz, W. Global habitat loss and extinction risk of terrestrial vertebrates under future land-use-change scenarios. Nat. Clim. Chang. 9, 323–329 (2019).
doi: 10.1038/s41558-019-0406-z