Remdesivir-related cost-effectiveness and cost and resource use evidence in COVID-19: a systematic review.


Journal

Infection
ISSN: 1439-0973
Titre abrégé: Infection
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0365307

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2023
Historique:
received: 05 05 2022
accepted: 20 09 2022
medline: 29 3 2023
pubmed: 13 10 2022
entrez: 12 10 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been a global health emergency since December 2019, leading to millions of deaths worldwide and placing significant pressures, including economic burden, on individual patients and healthcare systems. As of February 2022, remdesivir is the only US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved treatment for severe COVID-19. This systematic literature review (SLR) aimed to summarise economic evaluations, and cost and resource use (CRU) evidence related to remdesivir during the COVID-19 pandemic. Searches of MEDLINE, Embase the International Health Technology Assessment (HTA) database, reference lists, congresses and grey literature were performed in May 2021. Articles were reviewed for relevance against pre-specified criteria by two independent reviewers and study quality was assessed using published checklists. Eight studies reported resource use and five reported costs related to remdesivir. Over time, the prescription rate of remdesivir increased and time from disease onset to remdesivir initiation decreased. Remdesivir was associated with a 6% to 21.3% decrease in bed occupancy. Cost estimates for remdesivir ranged widely, from $10 to $780 for a 10-day course. In three out of four included economic evaluations, remdesivir treatment scenarios were cost-effective, ranging from ~ 8 to ~ 23% of the willingness-to-pay threshold for the respective country. Economic evidence relating to remdesivir should be interpreted with consideration of the broader clinical context, including patients' characteristics and the timing of its administration. Nonetheless, remdesivir remains an important option for physicians in aiming to provide optimal care and relieve pressure on healthcare systems through shifting phases of the pandemic.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been a global health emergency since December 2019, leading to millions of deaths worldwide and placing significant pressures, including economic burden, on individual patients and healthcare systems. As of February 2022, remdesivir is the only US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved treatment for severe COVID-19. This systematic literature review (SLR) aimed to summarise economic evaluations, and cost and resource use (CRU) evidence related to remdesivir during the COVID-19 pandemic.
METHODS METHODS
Searches of MEDLINE, Embase the International Health Technology Assessment (HTA) database, reference lists, congresses and grey literature were performed in May 2021. Articles were reviewed for relevance against pre-specified criteria by two independent reviewers and study quality was assessed using published checklists.
RESULTS RESULTS
Eight studies reported resource use and five reported costs related to remdesivir. Over time, the prescription rate of remdesivir increased and time from disease onset to remdesivir initiation decreased. Remdesivir was associated with a 6% to 21.3% decrease in bed occupancy. Cost estimates for remdesivir ranged widely, from $10 to $780 for a 10-day course. In three out of four included economic evaluations, remdesivir treatment scenarios were cost-effective, ranging from ~ 8 to ~ 23% of the willingness-to-pay threshold for the respective country.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Economic evidence relating to remdesivir should be interpreted with consideration of the broader clinical context, including patients' characteristics and the timing of its administration. Nonetheless, remdesivir remains an important option for physicians in aiming to provide optimal care and relieve pressure on healthcare systems through shifting phases of the pandemic.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36224452
doi: 10.1007/s15010-022-01930-8
pii: 10.1007/s15010-022-01930-8
pmc: PMC9555695
doi:

Substances chimiques

remdesivir 3QKI37EEHE

Types de publication

Systematic Review Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

285-303

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s).

Références

Pharmacoecon Open. 2021 Mar;5(1):129-131
pubmed: 33315210
JAMA. 2020 Sep 15;324(11):1048-1057
pubmed: 32821939
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 26;16(10):e0258643
pubmed: 34699552
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Sep 18;21(1):986
pubmed: 34537034
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 13;17(1):e0261142
pubmed: 35025917
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2029058
pubmed: 33301018
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Feb 16;9(2):
pubmed: 33669441
Adv Ther. 2021 Jul;38(7):4057-4069
pubmed: 34118007
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021 Jan 29;8(3):ofab040
pubmed: 33732750
Adv Ther. 2021 Apr;38(4):1811-1831
pubmed: 33650025
Eur J Clin Invest. 2020 Dec;50(12):e13423
pubmed: 33026101
Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Feb;22(2):209-221
pubmed: 34534511
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Nov;87(11):4386-4396
pubmed: 33855727
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Jul;123:171-173
pubmed: 32376119
Adv Ther. 2021 Sep;38(9):4935-4948
pubmed: 34379304
Clin Pract. 2021 Oct 21;11(4):778-784
pubmed: 34698149
Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Dec;110(6):2020-2025
pubmed: 32376350
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71
pubmed: 33782057
Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Apr 28;74(8):1450-1458
pubmed: 34265054
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2021 Apr;3:100041
pubmed: 33870249
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021 Nov 12;76(12):3296-3302
pubmed: 34473275
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 15;15(10):e0240783
pubmed: 33057403
N Engl J Med. 2020 Nov 5;383(19):1827-1837
pubmed: 32459919
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 May 4;72(9):1642-1644
pubmed: 32628744
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 May 28;70(21):792-793
pubmed: 34043615
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 12;17(1):e0262462
pubmed: 35020746
J Virus Erad. 2020 Apr 30;6(2):61-69
pubmed: 32405423
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2022 Feb 23;77(3):753-757
pubmed: 34849943
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Dec 6;73(11):2031-2036
pubmed: 34111274
BMJ. 2020 Oct 23;371:m3862
pubmed: 33097561
Science. 2021 Aug 27;373(6558):
pubmed: 34446582
Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Aug 24;75(1):e450-e458
pubmed: 34596223
Clin Drug Investig. 2022 Aug;42(8):669-678
pubmed: 35838880
Respir Care. 2019 Aug;64(8):986-993
pubmed: 31346073
Respir Care. 2011 Oct;56(10):1555-72
pubmed: 22008397
BMJ. 2020 Apr 2;369:m1382
pubmed: 32241813
Clin Drug Investig. 2022 Apr;42(4):345-354
pubmed: 35298832
N Engl J Med. 2020 Nov 5;383(19):1813-1826
pubmed: 32445440

Auteurs

Molly Murton (M)

Costello Medical, London, UK.

Emma Drane (E)

Costello Medical, Cambridge, UK.

James Jarrett (J)

Gilead Sciences, Inc., London, UK.

Oliver A Cornely (OA)

Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, Excellence Centre for Medical Mycology (ECMM), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne Excellence Cluster On Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Clinical Trials Centre Cologne (ZKS Köln), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Bonn-Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Alex Soriano (A)

Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain. asoriano@clinic.cat.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH