Unusual presentation of a common neurosurgical shunt procedure in an adult patient.
Ventriculoperitoneal shunt complications
hydrocephalus
peritoneal shunt migration
Journal
SAGE open medical case reports
ISSN: 2050-313X
Titre abrégé: SAGE Open Med Case Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101638686
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
02
08
2022
accepted:
12
09
2022
entrez:
13
10
2022
pubmed:
14
10
2022
medline:
14
10
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery is one of the treatments of hydrocephalus. It involves placing a shunt from the cerebral ventricles to the peritoneum serving as a drainage point. Infection and catheter blockage are some of the possible complications resulting from this procedure. In some cases, other incidents such as peritoneal shunt migration have also been described. Here, we present the case of a 73-year-old male patient treated with ventriculoperitoneal shunt for a normal pressure hydrocephalus. After an initial blockage of the ventricular catheter, a revision surgery was performed with only mild improvement of his neurological symptoms. A repeat shunt series X-ray showed a migration of the distal catheter into the scrotum through an inguinal hernia. He was successfully treated with a laparoscopic repair of the inguinal hernia and repositioning of the distal catheter into the peritoneal cavity. Scrotal migration and hydrocele are unusual presentations and complications of ventriculoperitoneal shunts. Close follow-up of patients with a ventriculoperitoneal shunt should be performed if they experience worsening of their neurological symptoms. Shunt integrity should be assessed and any complications should be managed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36225226
doi: 10.1177/2050313X221129770
pii: 10.1177_2050313X221129770
pmc: PMC9549185
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Langues
eng
Pagination
2050313X221129770Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2022.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.
Références
ANZ J Surg. 2019 Jan;89(1-2):E48
pubmed: 30756496
ANZ J Surg. 2021 Nov;91(11):2538-2540
pubmed: 33710723
J Neurol. 2021 May;268(5):1615-1622
pubmed: 31414193
World Neurosurg. 2018 Nov;119:e131-e137
pubmed: 30031953
J Neurosurg. 2018 Apr 1;:1-15
pubmed: 29701543
Med Ultrason. 2012 Jun;14(2):158-60
pubmed: 22675718
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2015;6C:198-202
pubmed: 25553524
J Surg Case Rep. 2010 Sep 01;2010(7):9
pubmed: 24946343
J Pediatr Neurosci. 2013 Jan;8(1):67-9
pubmed: 23772251
Pediatrics. 1974 Dec;54(6):791-6
pubmed: 4431676
Int J Surg. 2020 Dec;84:226-230
pubmed: 33181358
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2021 Aug 16;21(3):87-93
pubmed: 33989403
Pediatr Neurosurg. 2012;48(5):310-2
pubmed: 23816925
Acta Med Iran. 2013 Mar 16;51(2):135-8
pubmed: 23585322
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2019 Jul 1;17(1):97-102
pubmed: 30169650