Morphometric Analysis of the Proximal Femur With Its Clinical Correlation in Eastern Uttar Pradesh Region.

femur head diameter femur length fovea capitis morphometry neck shaft angle proximal femur

Journal

Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2022
Historique:
accepted: 04 09 2022
entrez: 13 10 2022
pubmed: 14 10 2022
medline: 14 10 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The anthropometry of the proximal femur holds great clinical significance in designing implants and prostheses for proximal femoral fractures and hip joint arthroplasties. Surgical fixation with a properly matched prosthesis plays a crucial role in improving long-term treatment outcomes and preventing post-operative complications such as osteolysis with aseptic loosening and increased load. The femur is also one of the most commonest used bones for stature estimation. Often during forensic investigations, only fragmented remains of femur are found available from which femoral length is estimated by application of linear regression equations. The estimated femoral length thus obtained is used for stature estimation of the unidentified individual. This study has measured nine bony parameters from the proximal femur in a total of 96 dry femora. These measurements include the vertical head diameter, neck diameter, neck thickness, neck length, neck shaft angle, the transverse diameter of the fovea, longitudinal diameter of the fovea, foveal depth, and the intertrochanteric line length. In addition, the total length of the femur was also measured. The results were tabulated and statistically analyzed using SPSS software, version 25. The mean femoral head diameter was observed to be 41.59±3.25 mm, mean foveal depth was found to be 2.95±0.75 mm, mean foveal transverse and longitudinal diameters were observed to be 11.38±2.35 mm and 15.94±3.37 mm, respectively. The mean neck diameter was 29.45±3.33 mm. Mean neck length and neck thickness were observed to be 36.06±4.94 mm and 27.61±2.71 mm, respectively. Neck shaft angle was noted to range from 109° to 128°, with a mean of 119.08°±5.18°. The mean length of the inter-trochanteric line was measured to be 41.92±3.9 mm. The mean femoral length was observed to be 42.11±2.91 cm. Significant positive correlations were found between the various measured proximal morphometric parameters of the femur. The length of the femur showed a maximum positive correlation with the vertical head diameter, followed by the neck diameter, thickness, and foveal depth. The findings of this study can throw further light on the existing data. They can serve as a guideline for designing better-matched prostheses and implants for hip surgeries in the eastern Uttar Pradesh population.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36225441
doi: 10.7759/cureus.28780
pmc: PMC9532221
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e28780

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022, Gupta et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Indian J Orthop. 2016 May-Jun;50(3):269-76
pubmed: 27293287
Indian J Orthop. 2020 Sep 16;55(Suppl 1):46-55
pubmed: 34122754
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Feb;11(2):AC01-AC04
pubmed: 28384844
Homo. 2013 Feb;64(1):29-41
pubmed: 23218649
J Orthop. 2019 Dec 10;20:63-69
pubmed: 32042232
Anat Cell Biol. 2016 Sep;49(3):206-209
pubmed: 27722014
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976 Oct;58(7):961-70
pubmed: 977628
Indian J Orthop. 2008 Jul;42(3):260-6
pubmed: 19753150
Clin Anat. 1997;10(5):318-23
pubmed: 9283729
Indian J Orthop. 2012 Jan;46(1):46-53
pubmed: 22345806
J Forensic Leg Med. 2012 Apr;19(3):132-6
pubmed: 22390998
Forensic Sci Int. 2009 Nov 20;192(1-3):131.e1-5
pubmed: 19775842
Osteoporos Int. 1992 Nov;2(6):285-9
pubmed: 1421796
J Bone Miner Res. 2005 Mar;20(3):520-8
pubmed: 15746998
Malays Orthop J. 2020 Nov;14(3):143-150
pubmed: 33403075
J Forensic Sci. 2008 Sep;53(5):1044-8
pubmed: 18636977
Indian J Orthop. 2017 Mar-Apr;51(2):155-161
pubmed: 28400660
Leg Med (Tokyo). 2022 Sep;58:102081
pubmed: 35504140
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Apr;89(4):780-5
pubmed: 17403800
Surg Radiol Anat. 2020 Oct;42(10):1243-1254
pubmed: 32474617
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015 Feb;101(1 Suppl):S25-9
pubmed: 25596984
Clin Anat. 1996;9(1):28-33
pubmed: 8838277

Auteurs

Mayank Gupta (M)

Forensic Medicine, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University (BHU), Varanasi, IND.

Deepa Devadas (D)

Anatomy, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University (BHU), Varanasi, IND.

Chetan Sahni (C)

Anatomy, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University (BHU), Varanasi, IND.

Amit Nayak (A)

Anatomy, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University (BHU), Varanasi, IND.

Praveen K Tiwari (PK)

Forensic Medicine, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University (BHU), Varanasi, IND.

Anand Mishra (A)

Anatomy, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University (BHU), Varanasi, IND.

Classifications MeSH