Salient beliefs about modifiable risk behaviours among patients living with diabetes, hypertension or both: A qualitative formative study.
Malawi
Mangochi
diabetes
hypertension
lifestyle
modifiable behaviours
noncommunicable diseases
risk
salient belief
theory of planned behaviour.
Journal
African journal of primary health care & family medicine
ISSN: 2071-2936
Titre abrégé: Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med
Pays: South Africa
ID NLM: 101520860
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 Sep 2022
09 Sep 2022
Historique:
received:
06
11
2021
accepted:
02
06
2022
revised:
01
06
2022
entrez:
13
10
2022
pubmed:
14
10
2022
medline:
18
10
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Although there is evidence of the key role played by focusing on local knowledge in designing appropriate interventions regarding modifiable risk behaviours among patients living with diabetes and hypertension in Mangochi (and Malawi), little is known about local salient beliefs. With a focus on the theory of planned behaviour as a theoretical lens, this study aimed to identify salient beliefs about modifiable risk behaviours among patients with diabetes, hypertension or both in Mangochi, south-eastern Malawi. Specifically, the objectives were to identify advantages and disadvantages (behavioural salient beliefs), people who approve or disapprove (normative salient beliefs) and enablers and barriers (control salient beliefs) for measures to change modifiable risk behaviours among patients with diabetes, hypertension or both in Mangochi, Malawi. A hypertension diabetes clinic at Mangochi District Hospital, south-eastern Malawi. A formative qualitative study of a quasi-experimental trial was conducted among 25 patients, purposefully sampled, who were living with diabetes, hypertension or both at Mangochi District Hospital in February 2019. Researchers conducted in-depth interviews with patients using an interview guide informed by the theory of planned behaviour's elicitation interview guide. Thematic content analysis was used to identify emerging themes. A total of 25 participants were recruited, of which 12 (48%) were living with diabetes. Five thematic areas emerged from this analysis: physical and psychological fitness, social disconnection, perceived support systems, perceived enablers and perceived barriers to change. Appropriate words for each salient belief were identified. Future researchers should use the identified salient beliefs when designing interventions based on the theory of planned behaviour in diabetes and hypertension.Contribution: The paper adds to the body of knowledge informing the use of theory of planned behavior in addressing modifiable risk factors among practitioners, specialists and academics in primary care and Family Medicine in the field of noncommunicable diseases in Mangochi Malawi and beyond.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Although there is evidence of the key role played by focusing on local knowledge in designing appropriate interventions regarding modifiable risk behaviours among patients living with diabetes and hypertension in Mangochi (and Malawi), little is known about local salient beliefs.
AIM
OBJECTIVE
With a focus on the theory of planned behaviour as a theoretical lens, this study aimed to identify salient beliefs about modifiable risk behaviours among patients with diabetes, hypertension or both in Mangochi, south-eastern Malawi. Specifically, the objectives were to identify advantages and disadvantages (behavioural salient beliefs), people who approve or disapprove (normative salient beliefs) and enablers and barriers (control salient beliefs) for measures to change modifiable risk behaviours among patients with diabetes, hypertension or both in Mangochi, Malawi.
SETTING
METHODS
A hypertension diabetes clinic at Mangochi District Hospital, south-eastern Malawi.
METHODS
METHODS
A formative qualitative study of a quasi-experimental trial was conducted among 25 patients, purposefully sampled, who were living with diabetes, hypertension or both at Mangochi District Hospital in February 2019. Researchers conducted in-depth interviews with patients using an interview guide informed by the theory of planned behaviour's elicitation interview guide. Thematic content analysis was used to identify emerging themes.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 25 participants were recruited, of which 12 (48%) were living with diabetes. Five thematic areas emerged from this analysis: physical and psychological fitness, social disconnection, perceived support systems, perceived enablers and perceived barriers to change.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Appropriate words for each salient belief were identified. Future researchers should use the identified salient beliefs when designing interventions based on the theory of planned behaviour in diabetes and hypertension.Contribution: The paper adds to the body of knowledge informing the use of theory of planned behavior in addressing modifiable risk factors among practitioners, specialists and academics in primary care and Family Medicine in the field of noncommunicable diseases in Mangochi Malawi and beyond.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36226929
doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v14i1.3327
pmc: PMC9558168
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e1-e12Références
Diabetes Care. 2012 Jun;35(6):1239-45
pubmed: 22538012
Ann Behav Med. 2011 Jun;41(3):310-23
pubmed: 21213091
Lancet. 2019 May 11;393(10184):1958-1972
pubmed: 30954305
Br J Health Psychol. 2012 Feb;17(1):1-17
pubmed: 22233102
BMC Res Notes. 2018 May 2;11(1):267
pubmed: 29720279
Diabetes Care. 2002 Jan;25(1):78-83
pubmed: 11772905
Lancet. 2020 Aug 22;396(10250):565-582
pubmed: 32828189
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 27;12(4):e0175149
pubmed: 28448503
Psychol Health. 2021 Oct 16;:1-19
pubmed: 34658281
Malawi Med J. 2021 Sep;33(3):159-168
pubmed: 35233273
Health Educ Behav. 2009 Apr;36(2):381-93
pubmed: 18077658
Burns. 2019 Aug;45(5):1242-1250
pubmed: 30850226
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2011 Nov-Dec;43(6):536-42
pubmed: 21852196
Health Promot Int. 2015 Sep;30(3):756-68
pubmed: 24504361
Annu Rev Public Health. 2013;34:77-95
pubmed: 23297654
Psychol Health. 2010 Oct;25(8):925-41
pubmed: 20204952
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2012 Jul-Aug;44(4):319-25
pubmed: 22572403
Nutrients. 2019 Apr 26;11(5):
pubmed: 31035514
Obes Rev. 2017 Jan;18(1):1-17
pubmed: 27764897
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2019 Nov;35(8):e3188
pubmed: 31121637
Glob Heart. 2019 Jun;14(2):109-118
pubmed: 31324364
Br J Soc Psychol. 2005 Dec;44(Pt 4):497-512
pubmed: 16368016
Diabetes Educ. 2014 Jan-Feb;40(1):48-59
pubmed: 24248832
J Aging Phys Act. 2010 Apr;18(2):119-40
pubmed: 20440026
Health Psychol. 2003 Jul;22(4):424-8
pubmed: 12940399
BMC Public Health. 2019 Aug 5;19(1):1049
pubmed: 31382938
Arch Intern Med. 2009 Oct 26;169(19):1788-94
pubmed: 19858437
Qual Quant. 2018;52(4):1893-1907
pubmed: 29937585
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019 Jun;51(6):1227-1241
pubmed: 31095080
J Health Commun. 2014;19 Suppl 2:132-43
pubmed: 25315589
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Nov;53(5):e165-e174
pubmed: 28818415
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2014 Jun 05;6(1):E1-5
pubmed: 26245437
Br J Soc Psychol. 2001 Dec;40(Pt 4):471-99
pubmed: 11795063
Prim Care Diabetes. 2015 Apr;9(2):127-34
pubmed: 25065270
J Aging Health. 2018 Mar;30(3):342-364
pubmed: 27940641