Tolerability and immunogenicity of an intranasally-administered adenovirus-vectored COVID-19 vaccine: An open-label partially-randomised ascending dose phase I trial.
Adenovirus vector
Intranasal vaccination
Mucosal antibody
SARS-CoV-2
Journal
EBioMedicine
ISSN: 2352-3964
Titre abrégé: EBioMedicine
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101647039
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2022
Nov 2022
Historique:
received:
03
05
2022
revised:
08
09
2022
accepted:
16
09
2022
pubmed:
14
10
2022
medline:
16
11
2022
entrez:
13
10
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Intranasal vaccination may induce protective local and systemic immune responses against respiratory pathogens. A number of intranasal SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidates have achieved protection in pre-clinical challenge models, including ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222, University of Oxford / AstraZeneca). We performed a single-centre open-label Phase I clinical trial of intranasal vaccination with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 in healthy adults, using the existing formulation produced for intramuscular administration. Thirty SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-naïve participants were allocated to receive 5 × 10 Reactogenicity was mild or moderate. Antigen-specific mucosal antibody responses to intranasal vaccination were detectable in a minority of participants, rarely exceeding levels seen after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Systemic responses to intranasal vaccination were typically weaker than after intramuscular vaccination with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19. Antigen-specific mucosal antibody was detectable in participants who received an intramuscular mRNA vaccine after intranasal vaccination. Seven participants developed symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. This formulation of intranasal ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 showed an acceptable tolerability profile but induced neither a consistent mucosal antibody response nor a strong systemic response. AstraZeneca.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Intranasal vaccination may induce protective local and systemic immune responses against respiratory pathogens. A number of intranasal SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidates have achieved protection in pre-clinical challenge models, including ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222, University of Oxford / AstraZeneca).
METHODS
METHODS
We performed a single-centre open-label Phase I clinical trial of intranasal vaccination with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 in healthy adults, using the existing formulation produced for intramuscular administration. Thirty SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-naïve participants were allocated to receive 5 × 10
FINDINGS
RESULTS
Reactogenicity was mild or moderate. Antigen-specific mucosal antibody responses to intranasal vaccination were detectable in a minority of participants, rarely exceeding levels seen after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Systemic responses to intranasal vaccination were typically weaker than after intramuscular vaccination with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19. Antigen-specific mucosal antibody was detectable in participants who received an intramuscular mRNA vaccine after intranasal vaccination. Seven participants developed symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection.
INTERPRETATION
CONCLUSIONS
This formulation of intranasal ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 showed an acceptable tolerability profile but induced neither a consistent mucosal antibody response nor a strong systemic response.
FUNDING
BACKGROUND
AstraZeneca.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36229342
pii: S2352-3964(22)00480-7
doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104298
pmc: PMC9550199
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Viral
0
BNT162 Vaccine
0
ChAdOx1 nCoV-19
B5S3K2V0G8
COVID-19 Vaccines
0
Viral Vaccines
0
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase I
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
104298Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of interests Oxford University has entered into a partnership with AstraZeneca to develop ChAdOx1 nCoV-19. AJR and KE may receive royalties arising from the University of Oxford/AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine. TL is named as an inventor on a patent application covering this SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and was previously a consultant to Vaccitech on an unrelated project. AVSH is a cofounder of and former consultant to Vaccitech is named as an inventor on a patent covering design and use of ChAdOx1-vectored vaccines (PCT/GB2012/000467), and may receive royalties arising for the University of Oxford/AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine. DW, EJK, TV, and JAG are current employees of AstraZeneca and hold or may hold AstraZeneca stock. ADD reports grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca outside of the submitted work, is a named inventor on patent applications relating the chimpanzee adenovirus platform technology and manufacturing, and may receive royalties arising from the University of Oxford/AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Références
Sci Transl Med. 2021 Aug 18;13(607):
pubmed: 34315826
Sci Transl Med. 2021 Jan 20;13(577):
pubmed: 33288662
Nat Commun. 2022 Sep 1;13(1):5135
pubmed: 36050304
J Immunol. 2004 Aug 1;173(3):1978-86
pubmed: 15265932
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Dec;21(12):1654-1664
pubmed: 34324836
Virology. 2015 Aug;482:60-6
pubmed: 25827529
Nat Rev Immunol. 2022 Apr;22(4):236-250
pubmed: 34312520
Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2015 Dec 09;23(3):243-5
pubmed: 26656116
Mucosal Immunol. 2022 Mar;15(3):379-388
pubmed: 34671115
J Virol. 1987 Jun;61(6):1851-4
pubmed: 3553614
Front Immunol. 2013 Aug 06;4:222
pubmed: 23964273
J Infect Dis. 2015 Dec 1;212(11):1719-25
pubmed: 25977264
Nature. 2020 Oct;586(7830):578-582
pubmed: 32731258
Lancet. 2021 Jan 9;397(10269):99-111
pubmed: 33306989
Vaccine. 2005 Jan 11;23(8):1029-36
pubmed: 15620476
Lancet. 2020 Aug 15;396(10249):467-478
pubmed: 32702298
J Vis Exp. 2018 Jan 21;(131):
pubmed: 29443104
J Immunol. 2002 Mar 15;168(6):2930-8
pubmed: 11884464
Vaccine. 1990 Oct;8(5):479-85
pubmed: 2251874
Nat Commun. 2021 Nov 26;12(1):6871
pubmed: 34836955
Vaccine. 2002 Jan 31;20(9-10):1340-53
pubmed: 11818152
Sci Transl Med. 2021 Jan 20;13(577):
pubmed: 33288661
EBioMedicine. 2022 Feb;76:103841
pubmed: 35085851
J Pharm Sci. 2004 Oct;93(10):2458-75
pubmed: 15349956
JCI Insight. 2022 Feb 8;7(3):
pubmed: 34990408
Lancet Respir Med. 2022 Aug;10(8):739-748
pubmed: 35605625
Front Immunol. 2022 Jun 10;13:860399
pubmed: 35757753
N Engl J Med. 2021 Dec 16;385(25):2348-2360
pubmed: 34587382
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994 Dec;38(12):2785-91
pubmed: 7695263
Lancet Respir Med. 2022 Aug;10(8):749-760
pubmed: 35644168
Cell Rep. 2021 May 4;35(5):109055
pubmed: 33905739
N Engl J Med. 2004 Feb 26;350(9):896-903
pubmed: 14985487
BMJ Open. 2015 Oct 28;5(10):e008748
pubmed: 26510727
EBioMedicine. 2022 Jan;75:103788
pubmed: 34954658
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Sep 07;9(9):
pubmed: 34579235
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2022 Jan;119(1):48-58
pubmed: 34585736
Sci Rep. 2015 Nov 18;5:16756
pubmed: 26576856
Lancet. 2021 Dec 19;396(10267):1979-1993
pubmed: 33220855
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jun 3;384(22):2092-2101
pubmed: 33835769
Front Immunol. 2021 Oct 12;12:744887
pubmed: 34712232
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jun 23;112(25):7809-14
pubmed: 26056267
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Apr;20(4):435-444
pubmed: 31978354
Cell Rep Med. 2021 Apr 20;2(4):100230
pubmed: 33754147
Thorax. 2022 Feb;77(2):203-209
pubmed: 34404754