Psychological health and wellbeing of primary healthcare workers during COVID-19 pandemic in Malaysia: a longitudinal qualitative study.
COVID-19
Healthcare workers
Longitudinal qualitative study
Primary care
Psychological impact
Journal
BMC primary care
ISSN: 2731-4553
Titre abrégé: BMC Prim Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9918300889006676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 10 2022
13 10 2022
Historique:
received:
18
04
2022
accepted:
20
09
2022
entrez:
13
10
2022
pubmed:
14
10
2022
medline:
18
10
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Primary healthcare workers (PHCWs) are at the frontline of dealing with viral pandemics. They may experience significant psychological stresses, which have hitherto not been examined in depth. We aimed to explore the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the psychological health and wellbeing of frontline PHCWs in Malaysia. We purposively recruited PHCWs with diverse backgrounds in Klang Valley, Malaysia. Using longitudinal qualitative methods, we conducted two sequential semi-structured telephone interviews, 3 to 4 weeks apart, to capture different stages of the pandemic. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed thematically. Twenty-one PHCWs participated yielding a total of forty-two interviews. Themes clustered around stressors associated with work, home, and leisure activities, emotional changes, and modifying factors. In the first interviews, COVID-19 had just started in Malaysia. Participants expressed fear about the actual and perceived personal risk of COVID-19 infection. Most were worried about transmitting COVID-19 to their family members. Some felt stigmatized because of this perceived risk of infection. By the second interviews, participants felt safer, but instead focused on the need to keep other people safe. Participants' emotions were influenced by their perceived risk of contracting COVID-19 infection. Internal factors such as religion enabled them to manage their concerns and develop personal coping strategies. Support from family members, colleagues, and employers promoted wellbeing during the pandemic. Training sessions, daily roll calls, and psychological support services were important in maintaining their psychological health and wellbeing. Many participants were hopeful and believed normalcy would return by the end of 2020. PHCW's psychological health and wellbeing evolved throughout the early stages of the pandemic and were influenced by their perceived risk of contracting the disease and personal belief structures. Clear updates on the disease and strategies for keeping safe at work and socially are essential to maintaining PHCWs' psychological health and wellbeing.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Primary healthcare workers (PHCWs) are at the frontline of dealing with viral pandemics. They may experience significant psychological stresses, which have hitherto not been examined in depth. We aimed to explore the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the psychological health and wellbeing of frontline PHCWs in Malaysia.
METHOD
We purposively recruited PHCWs with diverse backgrounds in Klang Valley, Malaysia. Using longitudinal qualitative methods, we conducted two sequential semi-structured telephone interviews, 3 to 4 weeks apart, to capture different stages of the pandemic. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed thematically.
RESULT
Twenty-one PHCWs participated yielding a total of forty-two interviews. Themes clustered around stressors associated with work, home, and leisure activities, emotional changes, and modifying factors. In the first interviews, COVID-19 had just started in Malaysia. Participants expressed fear about the actual and perceived personal risk of COVID-19 infection. Most were worried about transmitting COVID-19 to their family members. Some felt stigmatized because of this perceived risk of infection. By the second interviews, participants felt safer, but instead focused on the need to keep other people safe. Participants' emotions were influenced by their perceived risk of contracting COVID-19 infection. Internal factors such as religion enabled them to manage their concerns and develop personal coping strategies. Support from family members, colleagues, and employers promoted wellbeing during the pandemic. Training sessions, daily roll calls, and psychological support services were important in maintaining their psychological health and wellbeing. Many participants were hopeful and believed normalcy would return by the end of 2020.
CONCLUSION
PHCW's psychological health and wellbeing evolved throughout the early stages of the pandemic and were influenced by their perceived risk of contracting the disease and personal belief structures. Clear updates on the disease and strategies for keeping safe at work and socially are essential to maintaining PHCWs' psychological health and wellbeing.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36229779
doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01870-0
pii: 10.1186/s12875-022-01870-0
pmc: PMC9558025
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
261Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
J Infect Public Health. 2020 Jun;13(6):877-882
pubmed: 32505461
J Psychiatr Res. 2020 Oct;129:198-205
pubmed: 32763586
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2021 May;67(3):284-289
pubmed: 32779498
Development (Rome). 2020;63(2-4):181-190
pubmed: 33223765
Asian J Psychiatr. 2022 Feb;68:102956
pubmed: 34929588
Asian J Psychiatr. 2020 Oct;53:102222
pubmed: 32570096
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Mar;7(3):e14
pubmed: 32035030
Rev Psiquiatr Salud Ment (Engl Ed). 2021 Jun 18;:
pubmed: 34153496
Asian J Psychiatr. 2020 Jun;51:102080
pubmed: 32283512
J Infect Public Health. 2021 Mar;14(3):285-289
pubmed: 33610936
Health Policy Plan. 2016 Nov;31(9):1232-9
pubmed: 27277598
Med Care. 2005 Jul;43(7):676-82
pubmed: 15970782
Nurs Outlook. 2021 Jan-Feb;69(1):6-12
pubmed: 32919788
Fisc Stud. 2020 Sep;41(3):653-683
pubmed: 33362314
Gen Psychiatr. 2020 Jun 14;33(3):e100259
pubmed: 32596640
Br J Gen Pract. 2021 Feb 25;71(704):e166-e177
pubmed: 33558332
Virus Res. 2011 Dec;162(1-2):2-7
pubmed: 21925551
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Aug;290:113130
pubmed: 32497969
World Med Health Policy. 2022 Mar;14(1):6-18
pubmed: 34909242
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2021 Sep;67(9):1261-1267
pubmed: 34816918
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 15;17(24):
pubmed: 33333995
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 30;15(11):e0242249
pubmed: 33253238
Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2021 Oct;35(3):293-306
pubmed: 34511220
Psychol Med. 2020 May 27;:1-3
pubmed: 32456735
Am J Psychiatry. 2020 Jul 1;177(7):635-636
pubmed: 32605443
Biomed J. 2020 Aug;43(4):328-333
pubmed: 32387617