Accuracy of Response Assessment FDG PET-CT Post (Chemo)Radiotherapy in HPV Negative Oropharynx Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

PET-CT human papilloma virus oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer radiotherapy

Journal

Cancers
ISSN: 2072-6694
Titre abrégé: Cancers (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101526829

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
26 Sep 2022
Historique:
received: 05 09 2022
revised: 22 09 2022
accepted: 23 09 2022
entrez: 14 10 2022
pubmed: 15 10 2022
medline: 15 10 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Background: Data on the accuracy of response assessment 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) following (chemo)radiotherapy in patients with oropharynx squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is predominantly based on HPV-positive disease. There is a paucity of data for HPV-negative disease, which has a less favourable prognosis. Methods: 96 patients treated with (chemo)radiotherapy for HPV-negative OPSCC with baseline and response assessment FDG PET-CT between 2013−2020, were analysed. PET-CT response was classified as negative, equivocal, or positive based on qualitative reporting. PET-CT response categories were analysed with reference to clinicopathological outcomes. Test characteristics were evaluated, comparing negative results to equivocal and positive results together. Post-test probabilities were calculated separately for positive and equivocal or negative results. Results: Median follow-up was 26 months. The negative predictive value of a negative scan was 93.7 and 93.2%, respectively, for primary tumour and nodal disease. For a negative scan, the post-test probability was 0.06 for primary and 0.07 for nodal disease. The post-test probability of an equivocal scan was 0.51 and 0.72 for primary and lymph node, respectively. The post-test probability of a positive scan approached 1. For patients with/without a negative scan, two-year overall survival and progression-free survival were 83% versus 30% and 79% versus 17% (p < 0.001), respectively. Conclusion: The NPV of a negative response assessment PET-CT in HPV-negative OPSCC is high, supporting a strategy of clinical monitoring. Contrasting with the published literature for HPV-positive OPSCC, an equivocal response scan was associated with a moderate rate of residual disease.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36230604
pii: cancers14194680
doi: 10.3390/cancers14194680
pmc: PMC9563399
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : 28832
Pays : United Kingdom

Références

Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2019 Jun;31(6):344-351
pubmed: 30890299
J Laryngol Otol. 2016 May;130(S2):S75-S82
pubmed: 27841116
Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 5;10(1):4086
pubmed: 32139722
Head Neck. 2011 Dec;33(12):1675-82
pubmed: 22076976
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Nov 15;102(4):1029-1035
pubmed: 29960060
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016 Jul;43(7):1239-47
pubmed: 26707387
N Engl J Med. 2016 Apr 14;374(15):1444-54
pubmed: 27007578
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 1;363(1):24-35
pubmed: 20530316
Head Neck. 2019 Feb;41(2):551-561
pubmed: 30456825
J Laryngol Otol. 2016 May;130(S2):S90-S96
pubmed: 27841123
Radiother Oncol. 2018 Jan;126(1):3-24
pubmed: 29180076
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2022 May;19(5):306-327
pubmed: 35105976
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2019 Apr;31(4):212-218
pubmed: 30553580
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Dec 1;87(5):1078-85
pubmed: 24210079
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017 Jun;44(6):988-997
pubmed: 28091733
Eur Radiol. 2020 Feb;30(2):1212-1220
pubmed: 31485835
Cancer. 2010 May 1;116(9):2166-73
pubmed: 20186832
Head Neck. 2016 Sep;38(9):1299-309
pubmed: 27330003
Lancet. 2019 Jan 5;393(10166):40-50
pubmed: 30449625
Clin Radiol. 2016 Jul;71(7):e171-88
pubmed: 27207376
Oral Oncol. 2014 Mar;50(3):234-9
pubmed: 24387978
Oral Oncol. 2022 May;128:105870
pubmed: 35447564
Oral Oncol. 2019 Jan;88:153-159
pubmed: 30616786
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2021 May;33(5):331-339
pubmed: 33358282
Br J Radiol. 2015 Aug;88(1052):20140592
pubmed: 26081447
Oral Oncol. 2019 Oct;97:76-81
pubmed: 31437587
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Dec 20;27(36):6213-21
pubmed: 19884544
Radiother Oncol. 2020 Jul;148:14-20
pubmed: 32294581

Auteurs

Zsuzsanna Iyizoba-Ebozue (Z)

Department of Clinical Oncology, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK.

Sarah Billingsley (S)

Department of Radiology, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK.

Russell Frood (R)

Department of Radiology, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK.

Sriram Vaidyanathan (S)

Department of Radiology, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK.

Andrew Scarsbrook (A)

Department of Radiology, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK.
Leeds Institute of Health Research, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9NL, UK.

Robin J D Prestwich (RJD)

Department of Clinical Oncology, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK.

Classifications MeSH