Correlation between a Force-Sensing Oral Appliance and Electromyography in the Detection of Tooth Contact Bruxism Events.
bruxism
electromyography
force sensing
oral appliance
sleep bruxism
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 Sep 2022
21 Sep 2022
Historique:
received:
08
08
2022
revised:
02
09
2022
accepted:
14
09
2022
entrez:
14
10
2022
pubmed:
15
10
2022
medline:
15
10
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Oral appliances embedding sensors can be interesting tools for monitoring tooth contact bruxism in a home environment, as they address some of the usability limitations of portable electromyography (EMG) systems. In this study, an oral appliance for sleep bruxism monitoring was compared to an electromyograph. Simulated bruxism events with tooth contact, specifically clenching and grinding, and other occlusal activities unrelated to bruxism, were measured in 23 subjects with the two instruments simultaneously. The recordings were analyzed automatically by a computer program in order to compare the two techniques. The two instruments were found to be strongly correlated in terms of detecting events ( The two techniques were in agreement in measuring event frequency, duration and intensity in the studied group, suggesting that force-sensing oral appliances have the potential to be easy-to-use tools for home monitoring of bruxism, alone or as complements to portable EMGs.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Oral appliances embedding sensors can be interesting tools for monitoring tooth contact bruxism in a home environment, as they address some of the usability limitations of portable electromyography (EMG) systems. In this study, an oral appliance for sleep bruxism monitoring was compared to an electromyograph.
METHODS
METHODS
Simulated bruxism events with tooth contact, specifically clenching and grinding, and other occlusal activities unrelated to bruxism, were measured in 23 subjects with the two instruments simultaneously. The recordings were analyzed automatically by a computer program in order to compare the two techniques.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The two instruments were found to be strongly correlated in terms of detecting events (
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The two techniques were in agreement in measuring event frequency, duration and intensity in the studied group, suggesting that force-sensing oral appliances have the potential to be easy-to-use tools for home monitoring of bruxism, alone or as complements to portable EMGs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36233394
pii: jcm11195532
doi: 10.3390/jcm11195532
pmc: PMC9572190
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Pietro Maoddi and Marco Letizia are employed by Aesyra SA, manufacturer of the AesyBite Discover oral appliance. The other authors declare no conflict of interest.
Références
J Dent Res. 2007 Sep;86(9):837-42
pubmed: 17720851
J Oral Rehabil. 2020 May;47(5):549-556
pubmed: 31999846
J Dent Res. 1996 Jan;75(1):546-52
pubmed: 8655758
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007 Sep;104(3):e32-9
pubmed: 17618147
J Oral Rehabil. 2018 Nov;45(11):837-844
pubmed: 29926505
J Clin Med. 2019 Jun 28;8(7):
pubmed: 31261634
J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Aug;86(2):195-202
pubmed: 11514809
J Oral Rehabil. 2014 Mar;41(3):163-9
pubmed: 24417585
J Oral Rehabil. 2008 Mar;35(3):171-83
pubmed: 18254794
Sleep Breath. 2016 May;20(2):695-702
pubmed: 26527206
J Oral Rehabil. 2019 Nov;46(11):991-997
pubmed: 31264730
Br Dent J. 2018 Sep 28;225(6):497-501
pubmed: 30237554
J Orofac Pain. 2013 Spring;27(2):99-110
pubmed: 23630682
Sensors (Basel). 2012;12(9):11544-58
pubmed: 23112669
J Orofac Pain. 1996 Summer;10(3):270-82
pubmed: 9161232
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012 May;113(5):612-7
pubmed: 22668619
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010 Jun;109(6):e26-50
pubmed: 20451831
J Oral Rehabil. 2008 Jul;35(7):495-508
pubmed: 18557916
J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Mar 4;:
pubmed: 33678438
Int J Dent. 2022 Jun 14;2022:2524327
pubmed: 35747202
J Orofac Pain. 2010 Fall;24(4):367-72
pubmed: 21197508
J Sleep Res. 2021 Oct;30(5):e13320
pubmed: 33675267
J Oral Rehabil. 2017 Sep;44(9):722-734
pubmed: 28477392
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 10;18(18):
pubmed: 34574467
J Oral Rehabil. 2001 May;28(5):485-91
pubmed: 11380790
J Orofac Pain. 2003 Winter;17(1):58-64
pubmed: 12756932