Mechanisms and Neuroimaging Patterns of Hypereosinophilia-Related Ischemic Stroke: A Narrative Review through Three Cases.

border zone stroke brain MRI embolic pattern hypereosinophilia hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) stroke

Journal

Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
23 Sep 2022
Historique:
received: 24 07 2022
revised: 09 09 2022
accepted: 19 09 2022
entrez: 14 10 2022
pubmed: 15 10 2022
medline: 15 10 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Hypereosinophilic syndromes (HES) are a group of relatively rare disorders in which neurological manifestations, including ischemic stroke, are common. The hypothesized pathophysiological mechanisms are hypercoagulability, cardioembolism (mainly mediated by myocardial involvement) and damage to the endothelium. A variable ischemic pattern has been described, including an association of territorial and border zone ischemic stroke. Three patients who presented to our department with acute stroke were selected aiming to show these three different mechanisms inferred from the stroke pattern on brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and to simultaneously illustrate the three main causes of HES. The first patient is a 55-year-old man with an abrupt onset of aphasia due to an acute ischemic stroke involving the left parietal lobule and the angular gyrus; recent lab test had shown hypereosinophilia. An extensive workup excluded primary and secondary causes of hypereosinophilia so a diagnosis of idiopathic hypereosinophilia was done and he was treated with high doses of steroids. The second patient had severe hypereosinophilia and developed multiple small, scattered ischemic lesions, mainly in border zone zones. The history of severe asthma and recurrent sinusitis supported the diagnosis of EGPA (Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis); considering the severe clinical conditions and the presumptive role of hypereosinophilia in determining her symptoms, steroid treatment was promptly started, with good clinical response. The third patient also presented with multiple metachronous ischemic lesions, both in cortical and border zone distribution and marked eosinophilia; the diagnostic work-up found an ovarian cancer. She was treated with steroids and then underwent surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. HES should be considered in stroke etiological evaluation, although it is a rare disorder, and border zones pattern without large artery steno-occlusion on neuroimaging may help to raise the suspicion in the neurovascular diagnostic pathway. A thorough research of the sources of hypereosinophilia should be performed to select the appropriate therapy.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Hypereosinophilic syndromes (HES) are a group of relatively rare disorders in which neurological manifestations, including ischemic stroke, are common. The hypothesized pathophysiological mechanisms are hypercoagulability, cardioembolism (mainly mediated by myocardial involvement) and damage to the endothelium. A variable ischemic pattern has been described, including an association of territorial and border zone ischemic stroke.
METHODS METHODS
Three patients who presented to our department with acute stroke were selected aiming to show these three different mechanisms inferred from the stroke pattern on brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and to simultaneously illustrate the three main causes of HES.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION CONCLUSIONS
The first patient is a 55-year-old man with an abrupt onset of aphasia due to an acute ischemic stroke involving the left parietal lobule and the angular gyrus; recent lab test had shown hypereosinophilia. An extensive workup excluded primary and secondary causes of hypereosinophilia so a diagnosis of idiopathic hypereosinophilia was done and he was treated with high doses of steroids. The second patient had severe hypereosinophilia and developed multiple small, scattered ischemic lesions, mainly in border zone zones. The history of severe asthma and recurrent sinusitis supported the diagnosis of EGPA (Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis); considering the severe clinical conditions and the presumptive role of hypereosinophilia in determining her symptoms, steroid treatment was promptly started, with good clinical response. The third patient also presented with multiple metachronous ischemic lesions, both in cortical and border zone distribution and marked eosinophilia; the diagnostic work-up found an ovarian cancer. She was treated with steroids and then underwent surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
HES should be considered in stroke etiological evaluation, although it is a rare disorder, and border zones pattern without large artery steno-occlusion on neuroimaging may help to raise the suspicion in the neurovascular diagnostic pathway. A thorough research of the sources of hypereosinophilia should be performed to select the appropriate therapy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36233471
pii: jcm11195595
doi: 10.3390/jcm11195595
pmc: PMC9571035
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Références

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998 Sep;19(8):1479-84
pubmed: 9763381
Cureus. 2018 Jun 22;10(6):e2866
pubmed: 30148018
Arch Neurol. 2009 Apr;66(4):528-31
pubmed: 19364940
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004 Feb;75(2):305-7
pubmed: 14742613
J Clin Neurosci. 2010 Mar;17(3):377-8
pubmed: 20071179
Can J Neurol Sci. 1990 Nov;17(4):395-8
pubmed: 2276097
Stroke. 1991 Sep;22(9):1117-23
pubmed: 1926254
Neurology. 2008 Jan 1;70(1):80-2
pubmed: 18166711
Radiology. 2001 Jul;220(1):195-201
pubmed: 11425997
Brain. 2021 Dec 31;144(12):3561-3575
pubmed: 34718425
Neurology. 1999 Oct 12;53(6):1312-8
pubmed: 10522890
Radiographics. 2011 Sep-Oct;31(5):1201-14
pubmed: 21918038
Am J Med Sci. 2003 Aug;326(2):98-101
pubmed: 12920442
Arch Neurol. 1964 Jul;11:40-65
pubmed: 14147680
Neoplasia. 2002 Nov-Dec;4(6):465-73
pubmed: 12407439
J Neurol Sci. 2013 Feb 15;325(1-2):162-4
pubmed: 23290568
Neurology. 1994 Jul;44(7):1231-7
pubmed: 8035921
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2005;19(6):396-401
pubmed: 15900095
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012 Sep;130(3):607-612.e9
pubmed: 22460074
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010 Jul;126(1):179-81
pubmed: 20639012
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2016 Apr;50(2):240-51
pubmed: 26475367
BMC Neurol. 2020 Oct 1;20(1):361
pubmed: 33003998
Korean J Radiol. 2009 Sep-Oct;10(5):511-4
pubmed: 19721837
Stroke. 2005 Mar;36(3):567-77
pubmed: 15692123
Respir Med Case Rep. 2020 Jul 28;31:101178
pubmed: 32775193
Stroke. 2011 Nov;42(11):3138-43
pubmed: 21852602
J Clin Diagn Res. 2013 Oct;7(10):2316-8
pubmed: 24298517
Ann Intern Med. 1985 Jan;102(1):109-14
pubmed: 2981493

Auteurs

Maria Cristina Cioclu (MC)

Neurology Unit, OCB Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria, 42123 Modena, Italy.

Francesco Cavallieri (F)

Neurology Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42124 Reggio Emilia, Italy.

Manuela Napoli (M)

Neuroradiology Unit, Radiology Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42124 Reggio Emilia, Italy.

Claudio Moratti (C)

Neuroradiology Unit, Radiology Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42124 Reggio Emilia, Italy.

Rosario Pascarella (R)

Neuroradiology Unit, Radiology Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42124 Reggio Emilia, Italy.

Franco Valzania (F)

Neurology Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42124 Reggio Emilia, Italy.

Marialuisa Zedde (M)

Neurology Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42124 Reggio Emilia, Italy.

Classifications MeSH