Sub-Muscular Direct-to-Implant Immediate Breast Reconstruction in Previously Irradiated Patients Avoiding the Use of ADM: A Preliminary Study.

breast implant breast reconstruction direct to implant radiotherapy

Journal

Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 Oct 2022
Historique:
received: 11 09 2022
revised: 27 09 2022
accepted: 28 09 2022
entrez: 14 10 2022
pubmed: 15 10 2022
medline: 15 10 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The aim of this paper is to present a preliminary experience of sub-muscular primary direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction without acellular dermal matrix (ADM), after salvage mastectomy for local recurrence following prior irradiation. A retrospective investigation was performed on a prospectively maintained database of breast reconstruction cases at our institution between January 2015 and December 2020. We considered only immediate DTI breast reconstructions without ADM following radiotherapy and salvage mastectomy for local recurrence, with at least a 12-month follow-up. The study considered 18 female patients with an average of 68 years. According to the BREAST-Q questionnaire, all patients reported high levels of "satisfaction with outcome" with good "psychosocial wellness" and "physical impact" related to the reconstruction. The aesthetic evaluation showed a significant difference between the VAS score gave by the patient (mean 6.9) and the surgeon (mean 5.4). No implant exposure occurred in this series. In terms of complications, four patients (22%) suffered from wound dehiscence and were managed conservatively. Three patients (17%) required primary closure in day surgery following superficial mastectomy flap necrosis. Late capsular contracture was seen in seven patients (four Baker stage II and three Baker stage III, totally 39%); however, no patient was willing to undergo implant exchange. DTI breast reconstruction following prior irradiation can be considered as an option in patients who are not good candidates for autologous breast reconstruction. Our general outcomes compared favorably with literature data regarding the use of staged procedures, with acceptable complication rates and levels of patient satisfaction.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The aim of this paper is to present a preliminary experience of sub-muscular primary direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction without acellular dermal matrix (ADM), after salvage mastectomy for local recurrence following prior irradiation.
METHODS METHODS
A retrospective investigation was performed on a prospectively maintained database of breast reconstruction cases at our institution between January 2015 and December 2020. We considered only immediate DTI breast reconstructions without ADM following radiotherapy and salvage mastectomy for local recurrence, with at least a 12-month follow-up.
RESULTS RESULTS
The study considered 18 female patients with an average of 68 years. According to the BREAST-Q questionnaire, all patients reported high levels of "satisfaction with outcome" with good "psychosocial wellness" and "physical impact" related to the reconstruction. The aesthetic evaluation showed a significant difference between the VAS score gave by the patient (mean 6.9) and the surgeon (mean 5.4). No implant exposure occurred in this series. In terms of complications, four patients (22%) suffered from wound dehiscence and were managed conservatively. Three patients (17%) required primary closure in day surgery following superficial mastectomy flap necrosis. Late capsular contracture was seen in seven patients (four Baker stage II and three Baker stage III, totally 39%); however, no patient was willing to undergo implant exchange.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
DTI breast reconstruction following prior irradiation can be considered as an option in patients who are not good candidates for autologous breast reconstruction. Our general outcomes compared favorably with literature data regarding the use of staged procedures, with acceptable complication rates and levels of patient satisfaction.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36233723
pii: jcm11195856
doi: 10.3390/jcm11195856
pmc: PMC9573151
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Références

Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1996 Sep;30(3):201-6
pubmed: 8885015
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2000 Jun;26(4):344-50
pubmed: 10873353
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020 Mar 1;106(3):514-524
pubmed: 31756414
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Jan;21(1):93-9
pubmed: 24081796
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Jan;135(1):43-50
pubmed: 25539295
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Oct 1;4(10):e2127806
pubmed: 34596671
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010 Mar;63(3):511-5
pubmed: 19110479
CA Cancer J Clin. 2014 Jan-Feb;64(1):52-62
pubmed: 24114568
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2008 May;32(3):418-25
pubmed: 18338102
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Jul;138(1):1e-14e
pubmed: 26986990
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2018 Jul;34(6):399-403
pubmed: 29672777
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Feb;129(2):317-329
pubmed: 21987041
Semin Plast Surg. 2019 Nov;33(4):264-269
pubmed: 31632210
Ann Plast Surg. 2014 May;72 Suppl 1:S61-5
pubmed: 24691306
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014 Jul;146(1):117-26
pubmed: 24831775
J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2014 Dec;48(6):375-81
pubmed: 24673121
Breast J. 2013 May-Jun;19(3):310-8
pubmed: 23745196
Ann Plast Surg. 2016 Feb;76(2):155-63
pubmed: 26637165
Ann Plast Surg. 2009 Apr;62(4):350-4
pubmed: 19325334
G Chir. 2015 Jul-Aug;36(4):145-52
pubmed: 26712068
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Feb;129(2):341-350
pubmed: 22286416
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Oct;25(10):2846-2851
pubmed: 29947005
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Feb;125(2):429-436
pubmed: 20124828
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001 Mar 1;49(3):713-21
pubmed: 11172953
Clin Breast Cancer. 2018 Oct;18(5):e825-e840
pubmed: 30072193
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995 Oct;96(5):1111-5; discussion, 1116-8
pubmed: 7568487
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 Sep 15;118(4):832-839
pubmed: 16980843
Gland Surg. 2018 Jun;7(3):267-272
pubmed: 29998076
Breast J. 2016 Jan-Feb;22(1):10-7
pubmed: 26782950
Ann Plast Surg. 1998 Apr;40(4):360-3; discussion 363-4
pubmed: 9555989
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2018 Jun;34(5):363-375
pubmed: 29510420
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2018 Jun;71(6):935-937
pubmed: 29506953
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Aug;132(2):201e-209e
pubmed: 23897347
Breast. 2017 Aug;34 Suppl 1:S78-S81
pubmed: 28690106
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015 Aug 31;112(35-36):593-600
pubmed: 26377531
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Nov;140(5):869-877
pubmed: 29068918
Clin Plast Surg. 2009 Jan;36(1):23-32, v
pubmed: 19055958

Auteurs

Lucrezia Pacchioni (L)

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital of Modena, 41125 Modena, Italy.

Gianluca Sapino (G)

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital of Modena, 41125 Modena, Italy.
Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, University Hospital of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.

Irene Laura Lusetti (IL)

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital of Modena, 41125 Modena, Italy.

Giovanna Zaccaria (G)

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital of Modena, 41125 Modena, Italy.

Pietro G Di Summa (PG)

Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, University Hospital of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.

Giorgio De Santis (G)

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital of Modena, 41125 Modena, Italy.

Classifications MeSH