Does anodal cerebellar tDCS boost transfer of after-effects from throwing to pointing during prism adaptation?
anodal tDCS
cerebellum
prism adaptation (PA)
sensorimotor plasticity
transfer
Journal
Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
31
03
2022
accepted:
05
09
2022
entrez:
14
10
2022
pubmed:
15
10
2022
medline:
15
10
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Prism Adaptation (PA) is a useful method to study the mechanisms of sensorimotor adaptation. After-effects following adaptation to the prismatic deviation constitute the probe that adaptive mechanisms occurred, and current evidence suggests an involvement of the cerebellum at this level. Whether after-effects are transferable to another task is of great interest both for understanding the nature of sensorimotor transformations and for clinical purposes. However, the processes of transfer and their underlying neural substrates remain poorly understood. Transfer from throwing to pointing is known to occur only in individuals who had previously reached a good level of expertise in throwing (e.g., dart players), not in novices. The aim of this study was to ascertain whether anodal stimulation of the cerebellum could boost after-effects transfer from throwing to pointing in novice participants. Healthy participants received anodal or sham transcranial direction current stimulation (tDCS) of the right cerebellum during a PA procedure involving a throwing task and were tested for transfer on a pointing task. Terminal errors and kinematic parameters were in the dependent variables for statistical analyses. Results showed that active stimulation had no significant beneficial effects on error reduction or throwing after-effects. Moreover, the overall magnitude of transfer to pointing did not change. Interestingly, we found a significant effect of the stimulation on the longitudinal evolution of pointing errors and on pointing kinematic parameters during transfer assessment. These results provide new insights on the implication of the cerebellum in transfer and on the possibility to use anodal tDCS to enhance cerebellar contribution during PA in further investigations. From a network approach, we suggest that cerebellum is part of a more complex circuitry responsible for the development of transfer which is likely embracing the primary motor cortex due to its role in motor memories consolidation. This paves the way for further work entailing multiple-sites stimulation to explore the role of M1-cerebellum dynamic interplay in transfer.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36237677
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.909565
pmc: PMC9552335
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
909565Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Fleury, Panico, Foncelle, Revol, Delporte, Jacquin-Courtois, Collet and Rossetti.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Cereb Cortex. 2011 Aug;21(8):1761-70
pubmed: 21139077
Neurology. 2005 Jul 12;65(1):150-2
pubmed: 16009906
Brain Stimul. 2015 Mar-Apr;8(2):269-76
pubmed: 25464828
Clin Neurophysiol. 2016 Feb;127(2):1031-1048
pubmed: 26652115
J Cogn Neurosci. 2021 Apr;33(4):563-573
pubmed: 33378244
Cereb Cortex. 2010 Apr;20(4):953-65
pubmed: 19684249
Nature. 1998 Sep 10;395(6698):166-9
pubmed: 9744273
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Dec;49(6):2031-2043
pubmed: 28039678
Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 30;10(1):5687
pubmed: 32231235
Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(13):2757-65
pubmed: 16504222
Brain Cogn. 2021 Jul;151:105735
pubmed: 33945939
Curr Opin Neurol. 2008 Dec;21(6):628-33
pubmed: 18989103
Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Dec;25(10):1347-57
pubmed: 17499467
Psychol Res. 2020 Jun;84(4):866-880
pubmed: 30406829
Exp Brain Res. 2004 Jun;156(4):399-408
pubmed: 15133651
Exp Brain Res. 1975 Jul 11;23(1):91-102
pubmed: 1149851
Psychol Aging. 2008 Mar;23(1):190-202
pubmed: 18361666
Cereb Cortex. 2015 Jul;25(7):1827-34
pubmed: 24436320
Cereb Cortex. 2020 Jul 30;30(9):4747-4758
pubmed: 32313949
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Apr;112:58-65
pubmed: 29524509
Cortex. 2018 Dec;109:226-233
pubmed: 30391877
Perception. 1974;3(4):451-60
pubmed: 4462076
Cortex. 2020 Feb;123:57-71
pubmed: 31759324
Neurosci Res. 2020 Apr;153:8-21
pubmed: 30910735
J Neurophysiol. 2012 Jun;107(11):2950-7
pubmed: 22378177
Brain Stimul. 2019 Sep - Oct;12(5):1177-1186
pubmed: 31040077
J Neurophysiol. 2013 May;109(10):2495-504
pubmed: 23446691
Cerebellum. 2017 Jun;16(3):695-741
pubmed: 28032321
Front Neurosci. 2019 Apr 12;13:266
pubmed: 31031578
Cortex. 2017 Sep;94:196-199
pubmed: 28342546
Cortex. 2022 Jan;146:39-49
pubmed: 34818617
Nature. 2004 Oct 14;431(7010):768-74
pubmed: 15483597
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Jul;48(9):2595-601
pubmed: 20457170
Percept Psychophys. 1993 Sep;54(3):355-64
pubmed: 8414894
Neurology. 1983 Jun;33(6):766-72
pubmed: 6682520
Elife. 2017 Sep 12;6:
pubmed: 28893377
J Mot Behav. 2001 Dec;33(4):401-12
pubmed: 11734414
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 19;11(1):1756
pubmed: 33469089
Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Jul;20(7):535-544
pubmed: 27261056
Neuropsychologia. 2014 Mar;55:15-24
pubmed: 24056297
Front Aging Neurosci. 2010 Dec 01;2:149
pubmed: 21151809
Neuropsychologia. 2017 Jan 8;94:84-95
pubmed: 27923662
Front Cell Neurosci. 2019 Jan 15;12:524
pubmed: 30697149
J Physiol. 2015 Aug 15;593(16):3645-55
pubmed: 25929230
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2018 Jul 8;41:415-429
pubmed: 29709206
J Physiol. 2000 Sep 15;527 Pt 3:633-9
pubmed: 10990547
Nature. 1996 Oct 17;383(6601):618-21
pubmed: 8857536
Brain. 1996 Aug;119 ( Pt 4):1199-211
pubmed: 8813283
J Neurophysiol. 2015 Jan 1;113(1):328-38
pubmed: 25298383
Learn Mem. 2000 Jul-Aug;7(4):193-8
pubmed: 10940319
Brain. 1996 Aug;119 ( Pt 4):1183-98
pubmed: 8813282
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Apr;49(5):1136-1145
pubmed: 21310165
PLoS Biol. 2006 Jun;4(6):e179
pubmed: 16700627
Cerebellum. 2022 Aug;21(4):715-730
pubmed: 34403075
J Neurophysiol. 2015 Oct;114(4):2460-71
pubmed: 26311179
Cerebellum. 2020 Feb;19(1):1-5
pubmed: 31707620
Psychol Bull. 2010 Nov;136(6):1023-44
pubmed: 20822209
Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 Apr;35(4):1574-86
pubmed: 23568448
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2009 May;62(Pt 2):439-56
pubmed: 18664317
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 7;12(7):e0179977
pubmed: 28686607
Eur J Neurosci. 2008 Oct;28(8):1696-704
pubmed: 18973586
Neurobiol Aging. 2019 Aug;80:138-153
pubmed: 31170534
J Neurosci. 2009 Jan 7;29(1):169-78
pubmed: 19129395
Brain. 2002 Mar;125(Pt 3):608-23
pubmed: 11872617
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Jul 1;115:188-203
pubmed: 29248498
Neurobiol Aging. 2014 Oct;35(10):2217-21
pubmed: 24792908
Brain Cogn. 2016 Jun;105:1-8
pubmed: 27031676
Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Apr;117(4):845-50
pubmed: 16427357
Ageing Res Rev. 2016 Jan;25:42-54
pubmed: 26607412
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2014 May;22(3):441-52
pubmed: 24760939
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2005 May;29(3):431-44
pubmed: 15820548
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2013;2013:237-40
pubmed: 24109668
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Aug;32(4):1006-22
pubmed: 16846294
J Neurophysiol. 1999 Apr;81(4):1960-5
pubmed: 10200230