Virtual INSIGHT: Improving natural social interaction: Group reHabilitation after traumatic brain injury.

functional communication group treatment speech language therapy telehealth traumatic brain injury

Journal

International journal of language & communication disorders
ISSN: 1460-6984
Titre abrégé: Int J Lang Commun Disord
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9803709

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
14 Oct 2022
Historique:
received: 28 04 2022
accepted: 30 08 2022
entrez: 14 10 2022
pubmed: 15 10 2022
medline: 15 10 2022
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

There is a growing body of literature that indicates positive outcomes of group treatment approaches to intervention for communication difficulties in chronic traumatic brain injury (TBI). The published research to date examines face-to-face group intervention. This study draws on one of these approaches, 'Improving Natural Social Interaction: Group reHabilitation after Traumatic brain injury' (INSIGHT), and examines the adaptation of this program to a virtual setting. The principles underlying the program, which involved providing an authentic contextualised and natural environment for group interactions and enhancing opportunities for identity expression, were maintained. Six participants with mild to severe TBI and cognitive communication difficulties participated in an 8-week pilot program of the virtual INSIGHT program. Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) scores completed over the course of the intervention served as the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcomes measures included The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status Update, The Awareness of Social Inference Test-Revised, the La Trobe Communication Questionnaire and the Satisfaction with Life Scale. A mixed multilevel analysis revealed significant improvement in GAS scores. A Wilcoxon signed rank test revealed no significant changes in secondary measures. There is a growing potential for this group treatment approach, in an online medium, and progress towards individualised goals was clear. The data have implications for examining the assessment measures typically used to document functional outcomes in clinical intervention. Future directions indicate a need to pursue more ecologically valid assessment methods. What is already known on the subject Recent literature has focused on the benefits of group intervention for cognitive communication diffuclties after traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, research to date examines only face-to-face group rehabilitation. As there has been a demand for a shift in the way we communicate worldwide, we must make adaptations to current intervention procedures to continue to serve individuals with diverse communication needs. What this paper adds to existing knowledge This study contributes new information about the feasibility of a virtual communication skills group for individuals with TBI. This virtual INSIGHT (Improving Natural Social Interaction: Group ehabilitation after Traumatic brain injury) group intervention facilitates progress towards collaboratively set communication goals and the online setting has the potential to increase the accessibility of these services. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? Progress towards cognitive and social communication goals can be facilitated by an online group intervention. However, this progress was not correlated with scores on standard assessments of cognitive communication, social communication and quality of life. This has implications for the evaluation of the assessments typically used and their ecological validity and applicability to the communication context.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
There is a growing body of literature that indicates positive outcomes of group treatment approaches to intervention for communication difficulties in chronic traumatic brain injury (TBI). The published research to date examines face-to-face group intervention.
AIM OBJECTIVE
This study draws on one of these approaches, 'Improving Natural Social Interaction: Group reHabilitation after Traumatic brain injury' (INSIGHT), and examines the adaptation of this program to a virtual setting. The principles underlying the program, which involved providing an authentic contextualised and natural environment for group interactions and enhancing opportunities for identity expression, were maintained.
METHODS & PROCEDURES METHODS
Six participants with mild to severe TBI and cognitive communication difficulties participated in an 8-week pilot program of the virtual INSIGHT program. Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) scores completed over the course of the intervention served as the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcomes measures included The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status Update, The Awareness of Social Inference Test-Revised, the La Trobe Communication Questionnaire and the Satisfaction with Life Scale.
OUTCOMES & RESULTS RESULTS
A mixed multilevel analysis revealed significant improvement in GAS scores. A Wilcoxon signed rank test revealed no significant changes in secondary measures.
CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS CONCLUSIONS
There is a growing potential for this group treatment approach, in an online medium, and progress towards individualised goals was clear. The data have implications for examining the assessment measures typically used to document functional outcomes in clinical intervention. Future directions indicate a need to pursue more ecologically valid assessment methods.
WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS CONCLUSIONS
What is already known on the subject Recent literature has focused on the benefits of group intervention for cognitive communication diffuclties after traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, research to date examines only face-to-face group rehabilitation. As there has been a demand for a shift in the way we communicate worldwide, we must make adaptations to current intervention procedures to continue to serve individuals with diverse communication needs. What this paper adds to existing knowledge This study contributes new information about the feasibility of a virtual communication skills group for individuals with TBI. This virtual INSIGHT (Improving Natural Social Interaction: Group ehabilitation after Traumatic brain injury) group intervention facilitates progress towards collaboratively set communication goals and the online setting has the potential to increase the accessibility of these services. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? Progress towards cognitive and social communication goals can be facilitated by an online group intervention. However, this progress was not correlated with scores on standard assessments of cognitive communication, social communication and quality of life. This has implications for the evaluation of the assessments typically used and their ecological validity and applicability to the communication context.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36239152
doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12790
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© 2022 Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists.

Références

Behn, N., Marshall, J., Togher, L. & Cruice, M. (2019) Setting and achieving individualized social communication goals for people with acquired brain injury (ABI) within a group treatment. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 54(5), 828-840.
Behn, N., Marshall, J., Togher, L. & Cruice, M. (2021) Participants’ perspectives of feasibility of a novel group treatment for people with cognitive communication difficulties following acquired brain injury. Disability & Rehabilitation, 43(2), 171-180.
Bogner, J. (2013) The Participation Assessment with Recombined Tools-Objective. The Center for Outcome Measurement in Brain Injury. http://www.tbims.org/combi/parto
Bowen, D.J., Kreuter, M., Spring, B., Cofta-Woerpel, L., Linnan, L., Weiner, D., Bakken, S., Kaplan, C.P., Squiers, L., Fabrizio, C. & Fernandez, M. (2009) How we design feasibility studies. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 36(5), 452-457.
Bowman, K., Matney, C. & Berwick, D.M. (2022) Improving traumatic brain injury care and research: a report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Jama, 327(5), 419-420.
Coleman, J.J., Frymark, T., Franceschini, N.M. & Theodoros, D.G. (2015) Assessment and treatment of cognition and communication skills in adults with acquired brain injury via telepractice: a systematic review. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 24(2), 295-315.
Dahlberg, C.A., Cusick, C.P., Hawley, L.A., Newman, J.K., Morey, C.E., Harrison-Felix, C.L. & Whiteneck, G.G. (2007) Treatment efficacy of social communication skills training after traumatic brain injury: a randomized treatment and deferred treatment controlled trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 88(12), 1561-1573.
Dewan, M.C., Rattani, A., Gupta, S., Baticulon, R.E., Hung, Y.C., Punchak, M., Agrawal, A., Adeleye, A. O., Shrime, M.G., Rubiano, A.M, Rosenfeld, J.V. & Park, K.B. (2018) Estimating the global incidence of traumatic brain injury. Journal of Neurosurgery, 130(4), 1080-1097.
Douglas, J.M., O'Flaherty, C.A. & Snow, P. (2000) Measuring perception of communicative ability: the development and evaluation of the La Trobe Communication Questionnaire. Aphasiology, 14, 251-268.
Gabbatore, I., Sacco, K., Angeleri, R., Zettin, M., Bara, B.G. & Bosco, F.M. (2015) Cognitive pragmatic treatment: a rehabilitative program for traumatic brain injury individuals. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 30(5), E14-E28.
Galusha-Glasscock, J.M., Horton, D.K., Weiner, M.F. & Cullum, C.M. (2016) Video teleconference administration of the repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 31(1), 8-11. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acv058
Grant, M. & Ponsford, J. (2014) Goal Attainment Scaling in brain injury rehabilitation: strengths, limitations and recommendations for future applications. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 24(5), 661-77.
Hoepner, J.K., Yingst, H., Harder, B. & Zehm, C. (2022) I never thought I would be an international speaker… but I am: an interpretive qualitative analysis of experiences of a project-based advocacy intervention. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 32(8), 2077-2101. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2022.2050410
Hart, T. Dijkers, M., Whyte, J., Turkstra, L., Sanca, J.M., Packel, A., Van Stan, J.H., Ferraro, M., Chen, C. (2019) A Theory-driven system for the specification of rehabilitation treatments. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 100(1), 172-180.
Kagan, A., Simmons-Mackie, N., Rowland, A., Huijbregts, M., Shumway, E., McEwen, S., Threats, T. & Sharp, S. (2007) Counting what counts: a framework for capturing real-life outcomes of aphasia intervention. Aphasiology, 21, 39-66.
Keegan, L.C., Behn, N., Power, E., Howell, S. & Rietdijk, R. (2023) Assessing conversation after traumatic brain injury. In C. Coehlo, L.R. Cherney & B.B. Shadden, (Eds.). Discourse analysis in adults with and without communication disorders: a resource for clinicians and researchers. San Diego, CA, USA: Plural Publishing.
Keegan, L.C., Müller, N., Ball, M.J. & Togher, L. (2022) Anger & aspirations: identity in traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 32(8), 2029-2053. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2022.2071949
Keegan, L.C., Murdock, M., Suger, C. & Togher, L., (2020) Improving social interaction: group rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 30(8), 1497-1522. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2019.1591464
Keegan, L.C. & Togher, L. (2018) An innovative clinical training model for students, using the context of a cognitive communication skills group. Perspectives of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Special Interest Groups, 3 (SIG 2), 21-30. https://doi.org/10.1044/persp3.SIG2.21
Krasny-Pacini, A., Evans, J., Sohlberg, M.M. & Chevignard, M. (2016) Proposed criteria for appraising goal attainment scales used as outcome measures in rehabilitation research. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 97(1), 157-170.
Kovarsky, D., Shaw, A. & Adingono-Smith, M. (2007) The construction of identity during group therapy among adults with traumatic brain injury. Communication & Medicine, 4(1), 53-66.
Liu, Y.H., Kwon, K. & Johnson, L.P. (2018) Exploration of factors in the early collaboration phase affecting virtual groups’ overall collaborative learning experiences. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(4), 485-512.
McDonald, S., Flanagan, S. & Rollins, J. (2011) The awareness of social inference test revised. New South Wales, Australia: Australasian Society for the Study of Brain Impairment.
MacDonald, S. (2017) Introducing the model of cognitive-communication competence: a model to guide evidence-based communication interventions after brain injury. Brain Injury, 31, 13-14, 1760-1780.
Malec, J.F. (1999) Goal attainment scaling in rehabilitation. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 9(3-4), 253-275.
Ownsworth, T. (2014) Self-identity after brain injury. New York, NY, USA: Psychology Press.
Pavot, W. & Diener, E. (2008) The satisfaction with life scale and the emerging construct of life satisfaction. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3(2), 137-152.
Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., Sarkar, D. & R Core Team. (2021) nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-153, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme
R. Core Team. (2021) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
Randolf, C. (2012) Repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status update. New York, NY, USA: Pearson.
Rietdijk, R., Power, E., Attard, M., Heard, R. & Togher, L. (2020) A clinical trial investigating telehealth and in-person social communication skills training for people with traumatic brain injury: participant-reported communication outcomes. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 35(4), 241-253. https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000554
Rietdijk, R., Togher, L. & Power, E. (2012) Supporting family members of people with traumatic brain injury using telehealth: a systematic review. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 44(11), 913.
Sarkar, D. (2008) Lattice: multivariate data visualization with R. New York, NY, USA: Springer.
Sohlberg, M.M., MacDonald, S., Byom, L., Iwashita, H., Lemoncello, R., Meulenbroek, P., Ness, B. & O'Neil-Pirozzi, T.M. (2019) Social communication following traumatic brain injury part I: state-of-the-art review of assessment tools. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 21(2), 115-127.
Swain, J.E. (2018) Effects of leader humility on the performance of virtual groups. Journal of Leadership Studies, 12(1), 21-37.
Togher, L., McDonald, S., Tate, R., Power, E. & Rietdijk, R. (2010) Measuring the social interactions of people with traumatic brain injury and their communication partners: the adapted Kagan scales. Aphasiology, 24(6), 914-927.
Togher, L., Douglas, J., Turkstra, L.S., Welch-West, P., Janzen, S., Harnett, A., Kennedy, M., Kua, A. Patsakos, E., Ponsford, J., Teasell, R., Bayley, M.T. & Wiseman-Hakes, C. (2022 Forthcoming) INCOG 2.0 guidelines for cognitive rehabilitation following traumatic brain injury, Part IV: cognitive-communication and social cognition disorders. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation.
Togher, L., McDonald, S., Tate, R., Rietdijk, R. & Power, E. (2016) The effectiveness of social communication partner training for adults with severe chronic TBI and their families using a measure of perceived communication ability. Neurorehabilitation, 38(3), 243-255. https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-151316
Togher, L., Wiseman-Hakes, C., Douglas, J., Stergiou-Kita, M., Ponsford, J., Teasell, R., Bayley, M. & Turkstra, L. (2014) INCOG Recommendations for management of cognition following traumatic brain injury, Part IV: cognitive Communication. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 29(4), 353-368.
Turkstra, L.S., Norman, R., Whyte, J., Dijkers, M.P. & Hart, T. (2016) Knowing what we're doing: why specification of treatment methods is critical for evidence-based practice in speech-language pathology. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 25(2), 164-171.
Turner-Stokes, L., Williams, H. & Johnson, J. (2009) Goal Attainment Scaling; does it provide added value as a person-centred measure for evaluation of outcome in neurorehabilitation following acquired brain injury? Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 41, 528-535.
Weidner, K. & Lowman, J. (2020) Telepractice for adult speech-language pathology services: a systematic review. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 5(1), 326-338.
Westby, C.E. (1990) Ethnographic interviewing: asking the right questions to the right people in the right ways. Journal of Childhood Communication Disorders, 13(1), 101-111.
Ylvisaker, M. (2006) Self-coaching: a context-sensitive person-centered approach to social communication after traumatic brain injury. Brain Impairment, 7(3), 246-258.
Ylvisaker, M. & Feeney, T. (1998) Collaborative Brain Injury Intervention: Positive Everyday Routines. San Diego, CA, USA: Singular Publishing Group Inc.
Ylvisaker, M., Mcpherson, K., Kayes, N. & Pellett, E. (2008) Metaphoric identity mapping: facilitating goal setting and engagement in rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 18(5-6), 713-741.

Auteurs

Louise C Keegan (LC)

School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Moravian University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, USA.

Kelly Reilley (K)

School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Moravian University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, USA.

Molly Stover (M)

School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Moravian University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, USA.

Leanne Togher (L)

Speech Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Classifications MeSH