Equivalence of Paper and Electronic-Based Patient Reported Outcome Measures for Children: A Systematic Review.
Journal
Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition
ISSN: 1536-4801
Titre abrégé: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8211545
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 02 2023
01 02 2023
Historique:
pubmed:
15
10
2022
medline:
1
2
2023
entrez:
14
10
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) exist for a variety of chronic gastrointestinal disorders in children. The availability of electronic (e-)formats of PROMs enhance the accessibility of these tools. The International Society for Pharmacoeconomic and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) defines measurement equivalence (ME) as "comparability of the psychometric properties of data" obtained from the administration of original and adapted versions of PROMs. Consideration of proxy PROM versions is unique to pediatrics and must be included in ME evaluations. We conducted a systematic review (SR) of the literature evaluating ME of e-versions adapted from pediatric paper-based PROMs. A literature search was conducted through Medline, Embase, APA PsychInfo, and the Cochrane Library. Titles, abstracts, and manuscripts were reviewed by 2 independent reviewers. The search yielded 19 studies meeting pre-defined criteria. Just over half (52.6%) of 19 PROMs were disease-specific ones. ME between paper- and e-PROM versions was reported as present in all 19 studies evaluating 5653 participants under the age of 18 years. However, only 6 (31.6%) studies evaluated ME in proxy reported e-versions. Despite the use of PROMs for children with a variety of chronic gastrointestinal disorders, only 1 study evaluated a PROM in this population (IMPACT III for inflammatory bowel disease). Findings from this SR highlight strategic opportunities for the pediatric gastroenterologist to broaden the clinical and research armamentarium to include e-PROMs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36240491
doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000003636
pii: 00005176-202302000-00004
doi:
Types de publication
Systematic Review
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
128-136Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 by European Society for European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Références
FDA. Guidance for Industry Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims. Silver Spring, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2009. doi:10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002373
Black N. Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare. BMJ. 2013;346:f1671.
Deal L, Gold BD, Gremse DA, et al. Age-specific questionnaires distinguish GERD symptom frequency and severity in infants and young children: development and initial validation. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2005;41:178–85.
Franciosi JP, Hommel KA, DeBrosse CW, et al. Development of a validated patient-reported symptom metric for pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis: qualitative methods. BMC Gastroenterol. 2011;11:1–12.
Kamath BM, Abetz-Webb L, Kennedy C, et al. Development of a novel tool to assess the impact of itching in pediatric cholestasis. Patient. 2018;11:69–82.
Ng V, Nicholas D, Dhawan A, et al. Development and validation of the pediatric liver transplantation quality of life: a disease-specific quality of life measure for pediatric liver transplant recipients. J Pediatr. 2014;165:547–55.e7.
Otley A, Smith C, Nicholas D, et al. The IMPACT questionnaire: a valid measure of health-related quality of life in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2002;35:557–63.
Forrest CB, Schuchard J, Bruno C, et al. Self-reported health outcomes of children and youth with 10 chronic diseases. J Pediatr. 2022;246:207–12.e1.
Ng VL, Mazariegos GV, Kelly B, et al. Barriers to ideal outcomes after pediatric liver transplantation. Pediatr Transplant. 2019;23:1–8.
Johnston BC, Patrick DL, Devji T, et al. Patient-reported outcomes. In: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 6.2. (Updated February 2021 ); Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons. 2021.
Bele S, Chugh A, Mohamed B, Teela L, Haverman L, Santana MJ. Patient-reported outcome measures in routine pediatric clinical care: a systematic review. Front Pediatr. 2020;8:364.
Tan YH, Siew JX, Thomas B, Ng KC. Patient-reported outcome measures and value-based medicine in paediatrics: a timely review. Singapore Med J. 2021:e1–19.
Anthony SJ, Young K, Pol SJ, et al. Patient-reported outcome measures in pediatric solid organ transplantation: exploring stakeholder perspectives on clinical implementation through qualitative description. Qual Life Res. 2021;30:1355–64.
Lee SJ, Kavanaugh A, Lenert L. Electronic and computer-generated patient questionnaires in standard care. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2007;21:637–47.
De Faoite D. The advantages of electronic patient-reported measures and an example digital platform to collect ePROs after total knee arthroplasty. Med Access @ Point Care. 2018;2:1–6.
Meirte J, Hellemans N, Anthonissen M, et al. Benefits and disadvantages of electronic patient-reported outcome measures: systematic review. JMIR Perioper Med. 2020;3:e15588.
Miller TL, Schuchard J, Carle AC, Forrest CB, Kappelman MD, COMBINE Study Group. Use of patient-reported outcomes measurement information system pediatric measures as clinical trial endpoints: experience from a multicenter pragmatic trial in children with Crohn’s disease. J Pediatr. 2022;242:86–92.e3.
Brenner EJ, Long MD, Mann CM, et al. Validity and responsiveness of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system in children with ulcerative colitis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2021;73:67–72.
Ogden CA, Akobeng AK, Abbott J, Aggett P, Sood MR, Thomas AG. Validation of an instrument to measure quality of life in British children with inflammatory bowel disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2011;53:280–6.
Coons SJ, Gwaltney CJ, Hays RD, et al. Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO good research practices task force report. Value Heal. 2009;12:419–29.
Eremenco S, Coons SJ, Paty J, Coyne K, Bennett AV, McEntegart D. PRO data collection in clinical trials using mixed modes: report of the ISPOR PRO mixed modes good research practices task force. Value Heal. 2014;17:501–16.
Muehlhausen W, Doll H, Quadri N, et al. Equivalence of electronic and paper administration of patient-reported outcome measures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies conducted between 2007 and 2013. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015;13:167. doi:10.1186/s12955-015-0362-x.
doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0362-x
Gwaltney CJ, Shields AL, Shiffman S. Equivalence of electronic and paper-and-pencil administration of patient-reported outcome measures: a meta-analytic review. Value Heal. 2008;11:322–33.
Campbell N, Ali F, Finlay AY, Salek SS. Equivalence of electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2015;24:1949–61.
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71.
Lundy JJ, O’donohoe P, Coons SJ. Equivalence of paper and electronic modes of patient-reported outcome data collection: an answered question? In: ISPOR 21st Annual International Meeting. Washington2016.
Armijo-Olivo S, Stiles CR, Hagen NA, Biondo PD, Cummings GG. Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane collaboration risk of bias tool and the effective public health practice project quality assessment tool: methodological research. J Eval Clin Pract. 2012;18:12–8.
Kruse S, Schneeberg A, Brussoni M. Construct validity and impact of mode of administration of the PedsQL™ among a pediatric injury population. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014;12:168.
Sabatino MJ, Gans CV, Zynda AJ, et al. An electronic patient-reported outcomes measurement system in paediatric orthopaedics. J Child Orthop. 2019;13:431–7.
Mellor X, Buczek MJ, Adams AJ, Lawrence JTR, Ganley TJ, Shah AS. Collection of common knee patient-reported outcome instruments by automated mobile phone text messaging in pediatric sports medicine. J Pediatr Orthop. 2020;40:e91–5.
Minard JP, Thomas NJ, Olajos-Clow JG, et al. Assessing the burden of childhood asthma: validation of electronic versions of the Mini Pediatric and Pediatric Asthma Caregiver’s Quality of Life Questionnaires. Qual Life Res. 2016;25:63–9.
Nitikman M, Mulpuri K, Reilly C. Paper versus internet administration of questionnaires in an adolescent idiopathic scoliosis population: a randomized crossover study. J Investig Med. 2015;63:198. doi:10.1097/JIM.0000000000000133.
doi: 10.1097/JIM.0000000000000133
Raat H, Mangunkusumo RT, Mohangoo AD, Juniper EF, Van Der Lei J. Internet and written respiratory questionnaires yield equivalent results for adolescents. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2007;42:357–61.
Raat H, Mangunkusumo RT, Landgraf JM, Kloek G, Brug J. Feasibility, reliability, and validity of adolescent health status measurement by the Child Health Questionnaire Child Form (CHQ-CF): internet administration compared with the standard paper version. Qual Life Res. 2007;16:675–85.
Vinney LA, Grade JD, Connor NP. Feasibility of using a handheld electronic device for the collection of patient reported outcomes data from children. J Commun Disord. 2012;45:12–9.
Young NL, Varni JW, Snider L, et al. The internet is valid and reliable for child-report: an example using the Activities Scale for Kids (ASK) and the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL). J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62:314–20.
Yu JY, Goldberg T, Lao N, Feldman BM, Goh YI. Electronic forms for patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are an effective, time-efficient, and cost-minimizing alternative to paper forms. Pediatr Rheumatol. 2021;19:67.
Geerdink LM, Prince FHM, Looman CWN, van Suijlekom-Smit LWA. Development of a digital Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire for systematic monitoring of disease activity in daily practice. Rheumatology. 2009;48:958–63.
Toucheque M, Etienne A-M, Missotten P, Dupuis G. A comparison of a tablet version of the Quality of Life Systemic Inventory for Children (QLSI-C) to the standard paper version. Psychol Assess. 2016;28:780–5.
Mangunkusumo RT, Moorman PW, Van Den Berg-De Ruiter AE, Van Der Lei J, De Koning HJ, Raat H. Internet-administered adolescent health questionnaires compared with a paper version in a randomized study. J Adolesc Heal. 2005;36:70.e1–6.
Mellor X, Buczek MJ, Lawrence JT, Ganley TJ, Adams AJ, Shah AS. Delivery of common knee patient-reported outcome instruments by automated mobile phone text messaging in pediatric sports medicine. Orthop J Sport Med. 2019;7(Supplement 1):1–2.
Bushnell DM, Martin ML, Parasuraman B. Electronic versus paper questionnaires: a further comparison in persons with asthma. J Asthma. 2003;40:751–62.
Varni JW, Limbers CA, Burwinkle TM, Bryant WP, Wilson DP. The ePedsQL in type 1 and type 2 diabetes: feasibility, reliability, and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Internet administration. Diabetes Care. 2008;31:672–7.
Mangunkusumo RT, Duisterhout JS, De Graaff N, Maarsingh EJ, De Koning HJ, Raat H. Internet versus paper mode of health and health behavior questionnaires in elementary schools: asthma and fruit as examples. J Sch Health. 2006;76:80–6.
Wolff AC, Dresselhuis A, Hejazi S, et al. Healthcare provider characteristics that influence the implementation of individual-level patient-centered outcome measure (PROM) and patient-reported experience measure (PREM) data across practice settings: a protocol for a mixed methods systematic revie. Syst Rev. 2021;10:1–12.
Page MJ, Moher D, Bossuyt PM, et al. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n160.
Varni JW, Limbers C, Burwinkle TM. Literature review: Health-related quality of life measurement in pediatric oncology: hearing the voices of the children. J Pediatr Psychol. 2007;32:1151–63.
Lapin B, Thompson N, Schuster A, Katzan IL. Optimal methods for reducing proxy-introduced bias on patient-reported outcome measurements for group-level analyses. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2021;14:e007960.
Shemesh E, Newcorn JH, Rockmore L, et al. Comparison of parent and child reports of emotional trauma symptoms in pediatric outpatient settings. Pediatrics. 2005;115:e582–589.
Morris C, Gibbons E, Fitzpatrick R. Child and Parent Reported Outcome Measures: A Scoping Report Focusing on Feasibility For the Routine Use in the NHS. Oxford, UK: University of Oxford. 2009.
Bagheri Z, Chamanpara P, Jafari P, et al. Cross-cultural measurement invariance of the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short form across ten countries: the application of Bayesian approximate measurement invariance. BMC Psychol. 2022;10:1–10.
Shakya R, Suwal R, Adhikari I, Shrestha J, Gyawali S, Shrestha A. Cross cultural adaptation and validation of Nepali Version of Activity Scale for Kids (ASK). J Patient-Reported Outcomes. 2022;6:1–7.
Velikova G, Booth L, Smith AB, et al. Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:714–24.
Chen J, Ou L, Hollis SJ. A systematic review of the impact of routine collection of patient reported outcome measures on patients, providers and health organisations in an oncologic setting. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:1–24.
Nitikman M, Mulpuri K, Reilly CW. Internet-administered health-related quality of life questionnaires compared with pen and paper in an adolescent scoliosis population: a randomized crossover study. J Pediatr Orthop. 2017;37:e75–9.
Rajmil L, Robles N, Rodriguez-Arjona D, et al. Comparison of the web-based and digital questionnaires of the Spanish and Catalan versions of the KIDSCREEN-52. PLoS One. 2014;9:e114527.
Robles N, Rajmil L, Rodriguez-Arjona D, et al. Development of the web-based Spanish and Catalan versions of the Euroqol 5D-Y (EQ-5D-Y) and comparison of results with the paper version. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015;13:72.