Restoration and maintenance of segment lordosis in oblique lumbar interbody fusion.
Cage subsidence
Lumbar degenerative disease
Oblique lumbar interbody fusion
Segment lordosis angle
Journal
BMC musculoskeletal disorders
ISSN: 1471-2474
Titre abrégé: BMC Musculoskelet Disord
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968565
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 Oct 2022
14 Oct 2022
Historique:
received:
01
04
2022
accepted:
27
09
2022
entrez:
14
10
2022
pubmed:
15
10
2022
medline:
19
10
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Restoration of the segment lordosis angle (SLA) can effectively reduce the risk of adjacent segment degeneration. This study aimed to perform a comprehensive multifactor analysis of the risk factors affecting restoration and maintenance of the SLA in oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF). Seventy-three patients (93 segments) who underwent OLIF with posterior pedicle screw fixation due to lumbar degenerative disease between January 2015 and December 2019 were included. Radiographic parameters including the middle disc height (MDH), segment lordosis angle (SLA), cage center point ratio (CPR), cage subsidence, and L1 CT Hounsfield Unit (HU) were measured. The postoperative SLA increased from 3.5° to 8.7°, and decreased to 6.7° at the last follow-up. Multivariate analysis showed that preoperative SLA, CPR and cage subsidence were significantly correlated with SLA restoration. The significant correlations were between restoration of SLA with pre-operative SLA (r=-0.575, adjusted R2 = 0.323, P < 0.01) and between SLA restoration and CPR (r = 0.526, adjusted R2 = 0.268, P < 0.01). Cage subsidence was found in 12.9% (12/93) of segments and was the main factor affecting SLA loss (4.2 ± 1.0° versus 1.7 ± 2.1°, P < 0.01). Logistic regression analysis showed that CPR < 50%, L1 CT HU < 110 and cage height > preoperative MDH were risk factors for cage subsidence. Cages placed anteriorly (CPR ≥ 50%) showed a large SLA increase and lower incidence of cage subsidence than those placed posteriorly (5.9 ± 3.9° versus 4.2 ± 3.2°, P < 0.05; 1.8% versus 28.9%, P < 0.05, respectively). SLA restoration is dependent on preoperative SLA, cage subsidence and cage position in OLIF. Cage position is the key determinant of SLA restoration and placement of the cage at the anterior position (CPR ≥ 50%) can achieve better restoration of the SLA and reduce the incidence of cage subsidence.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36242007
doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05855-z
pii: 10.1186/s12891-022-05855-z
pmc: PMC9563436
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
914Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Global Spine J. 2022 Mar;12(2):204-208
pubmed: 32856471
J Neurosurg Spine. 2021 Jul 23;35(4):454-459
pubmed: 34298517
Eur Spine J. 2017 Nov;26(11):2843-2850
pubmed: 28620787
Eur Spine J. 2015 Nov;24(11):2474-80
pubmed: 26266771
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Nov 15;43(22):E1350-E1357
pubmed: 30383726
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Jul 1;42(13):E775-E780
pubmed: 27779605
Global Spine J. 2021 Nov 4;:21925682211052515
pubmed: 34736351
J Clin Neurosci. 2017 Oct;44:11-17
pubmed: 28676316
Eur Spine J. 2021 Jan;30(1):79-87
pubmed: 33226482
Global Spine J. 2021 Dec 17;:21925682211067210
pubmed: 34920690
World Neurosurg. 2019 Jun;126:e606-e611
pubmed: 30831285
Neurosurgery. 2010 Dec;67(6):1600-7; discussion 1607-8
pubmed: 21107190
Eur Spine J. 2017 Mar;26(3):671-678
pubmed: 26245906
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 May 20;38(12):E755-62
pubmed: 23442780
Spine J. 2017 Apr;17(4):545-553
pubmed: 27884744
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2014 Jul;27(5):253-6
pubmed: 23511641
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Feb 1;40(3):E175-82
pubmed: 25394317
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2021 Sep;163(9):2557-2565
pubmed: 34297205
Eur Spine J. 2019 Aug;28(8):1758-1766
pubmed: 30306332
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Apr 2;96(7):557-63
pubmed: 24695922
World Neurosurg. 2017 Aug;104:644-652
pubmed: 28526641
World Neurosurg. 2018 Oct;118:e856-e864
pubmed: 30031179
Neurosurg Focus. 2020 Aug;49(2):E9
pubmed: 32738808
Clin Spine Surg. 2017 Jul;30(6):E784-E790
pubmed: 27352372
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011 May;24(3):189-95
pubmed: 20634726
World Neurosurg. 2019 Feb;122:599-606
pubmed: 30476670
Eur Spine J. 2009 Nov;18(11):1621-8
pubmed: 19475436
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Oct 1;45(19):E1279-E1285
pubmed: 32472823
World Neurosurg. 2020 Sep;141:e389-e399
pubmed: 32454196
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2022 Jan;65(1):74-83
pubmed: 34879642
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Jan 1;480(1):163-188
pubmed: 34324459
Spine J. 2021 Jun;21(6):963-971
pubmed: 33540124
World Neurosurg. 2019 Feb;122:e627-e638
pubmed: 31108079
Spine Surg Relat Res. 2017 Nov 27;1(4):197-202
pubmed: 31440634
J Neurosurg Spine. 2021 Jul 09;35(4):419-426
pubmed: 34243159
Eur Spine J. 2021 Jan;30(1):151-163
pubmed: 32960343