Rates and Predictors of Treatment Failure in Staphylococcus aureus Prosthetic Joint Infections According to Different Management Strategies: A Multinational Cohort Study-The ARTHR-IS Study Group.
Clinical failure
Functional failure
Outcome
Prosthetic joint infection
Staphylococcus aureus
Journal
Infectious diseases and therapy
ISSN: 2193-8229
Titre abrégé: Infect Dis Ther
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101634499
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2022
Dec 2022
Historique:
received:
23
06
2022
accepted:
20
09
2022
pubmed:
16
10
2022
medline:
16
10
2022
entrez:
15
10
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Guidelines have improved the management of prosthetic joint infections (PJI). However, it is necessary to reassess the incidence and risk factors for treatment failure (TF) of Staphylococcus aureus PJI (SA-PJI) including functional loss, which has so far been neglected as an outcome. A retrospective cohort study of SA-PJI was performed in 19 European hospitals between 2014 and 2016. The outcome variable was TF, including related mortality, clinical failure and functional loss both after the initial surgical procedure and after all procedures at 18 months. Predictors of TF were identified by logistic regression. Landmark analysis was used to avoid immortal time bias with rifampicin when debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) was performed. One hundred twenty cases of SA-PJI were included. TF rates after the first and all surgical procedures performed were 32.8% and 24.2%, respectively. After all procedures, functional loss was 6.0% for DAIR and 17.2% for prosthesis removal. Variables independently associated with TF for the first procedure were Charlson ≥ 2, haemoglobin < 10 g/dL, bacteraemia, polymicrobial infection and additional debridement(s). For DAIR, TF was also associated with a body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg/m TF remains common in SA-PJI. Functional loss accounted for a substantial proportion of treatment failures, particularly after prosthesis removal. Use of rifampicin after DAIR was associated with a protective effect. Among the risk factors identified, anaemia and obesity have not frequently been reported in previous studies. This study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov, registration no. NCT03826108. Staphylococcus aureus is one of the most virulent bacteria and frequently causes prosthetic joint infections.Knowledge of the treatment of this type of infection has advanced in recent years, and treatment guidelines have led to improved management. Typically, the successful treatment of these infections has been determined by clinical cure, that is, the symptoms of infection have disappeared, but has not taken into account loss of function (such as significant difficulties walking), which is critical for the patient’s quality of life. Our aim in this study was to evaluate the success of current management strategies for S. aureus prosthetic joint infection, including recovery of functionality, and the factors that predict why some of these infections are not cured, to identify areas for improvement.In a multinational cohort of 128 patients with S. aureus prosthetic joint infection, rates of treatment failure were found to be high, with significant rates of loss of function, especially when the prosthesis needed to be removed. Loss of function was less frequent when the infection was initially treated with surgical cleaning without removal of the prosthesis, even when this procedure failed at first. We found that anaemia and obesity were associated with lower treatment success, and that the probability of treatment success increased when surgical cleaning without prosthesis removal was performed early, and when the antibiotic rifampicin was used in combination with another antibiotic.
Autres résumés
Type: plain-language-summary
(eng)
Staphylococcus aureus is one of the most virulent bacteria and frequently causes prosthetic joint infections.Knowledge of the treatment of this type of infection has advanced in recent years, and treatment guidelines have led to improved management. Typically, the successful treatment of these infections has been determined by clinical cure, that is, the symptoms of infection have disappeared, but has not taken into account loss of function (such as significant difficulties walking), which is critical for the patient’s quality of life. Our aim in this study was to evaluate the success of current management strategies for S. aureus prosthetic joint infection, including recovery of functionality, and the factors that predict why some of these infections are not cured, to identify areas for improvement.In a multinational cohort of 128 patients with S. aureus prosthetic joint infection, rates of treatment failure were found to be high, with significant rates of loss of function, especially when the prosthesis needed to be removed. Loss of function was less frequent when the infection was initially treated with surgical cleaning without removal of the prosthesis, even when this procedure failed at first. We found that anaemia and obesity were associated with lower treatment success, and that the probability of treatment success increased when surgical cleaning without prosthesis removal was performed early, and when the antibiotic rifampicin was used in combination with another antibiotic.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36242742
doi: 10.1007/s40121-022-00701-0
pii: 10.1007/s40121-022-00701-0
pmc: PMC9669291
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03826108']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
2177-2203Subventions
Organisme : Innovative Medicines Initiative
ID : 115523
Investigateurs
Nienke Cuperus
(N)
Giuseppe Manfré
(G)
Ana Isabel Suárez-Barrenechea
(AI)
Alvaro Pascual-Hernandez
(A)
Alba Rivera
(A)
Xavier Crusi
(X)
Marcos Jordán
(M)
Nicolò Rossi
(N)
Tessa Vande Kerkhof
(T)
Juan P Horcajada
(JP)
Joan Gómez-Junyent
(J)
Albert Alier
(A)
Miranda van Rijen
(M)
Jannie Romme
(J)
Juliane Ankert
(J)
Celia Whitehouse
(C)
Adrian Jones
(A)
Javier Cobo
(J)
Javier Moreno
(J)
Anne Meheut
(A)
Claire Gledel
(C)
Pauline Perreau
(P)
Remco J A van Wensen
(RJA)
Gabriella Lindergard
(G)
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Tande AJ, Patel R. Prosthetic joint infection. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2014;27:302–45. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00111-13 .
doi: 10.1128/CMR.00111-13
pubmed: 24696437
pmcid: 3993098
Brandt CM, Sistrunk WW, Duffy MC, et al. Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic joint infection treated with debridement and prosthesis retention. Clin Infect Dis 1997;24:914–919. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9142792/ . Accessed 4 June 2021. https://doi.org/10.1093/CLINIDS/24.5.914 .
Salgado CD, Dash S, Cantey JR, Marculescu CE. Higher risk of failure of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic joint infections. Clin Orthop Related Res. 2007:48–53. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17534195/ . Accessed 3 June 2021. https://doi.org/10.1097/BLO.0b013e3181123d4e .
Joulie D, Girard J, Mares O, et al. Factors governing the healing of Staphylococcus aureus infections following hip and knee prosthesis implantation: a retrospective study of 95 patients. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2011;97:685–692. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22000281/ . Accessed 20 Mar 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.OTSR.2011.05.013 .
Senneville E, Joulie D, Legout L, et al. Outcome and predictors of treatment failure in total hip/knee prosthetic joint infections due to staphylococcus aureus. Clin Infect Dis 2011;53:334–340. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21810745/ . Accessed 3 June 2021. https://doi.org/10.1093/CID/CIR402 .
Lora-Tamayo J, Murillo O, Iribarren JA, et al. A large multicenter study of methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus prosthetic joint infections managed with implant retention. Clin Infect Dis 2013;56:182–194. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22942204/ . Accessed 3 June 2021. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cis746 .
Wouthuyzen-Bakker M, Tornero E, Morata L, et al. Moxifloxacin plus rifampin as an alternative for levofloxacin plus rifampin in the treatment of a prosthetic joint infection with Staphylococcus aureus. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2018;51:38–42. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28668678/ . Accessed 20 Mar 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJANTIMICAG.2017.04.011 .
Muñoz-Gallego I, Viedma E, Esteban J, et al. Genotypic and phenotypic characteristics of staphylococcus aureus prosthetic joint infections: insight on the pathogenesis and prognosis of a multicenter prospective cohort. Open forum Infect Dis 2020;7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33005695/ . Accessed 20 Mar 2022. https://doi.org/10.1093/OFID/OFAA344 .
Osmon DR, Berbari EF, Berendt AR, et al. Diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection: Clinical practice guidelines by the infectious diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2013;56. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23223583/ . Accessed 13 June 2021. https://doi.org/10.1093/CID/CIS803 .
Ariza J, Cobo J, Baraia-Etxaburu J, et al. Executive summary of management of prosthetic joint infections. Clinical practice guidelines by the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC). Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 2017;35:189–195. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0213005X16302816 . Accessed 1 Apr 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eimc.2016.08.012 .
Gómez-Junyent J, Lora-Tamayo J, Baraia-Etxaburu J, et al. Implant removal in the management of prosthetic joint infection by staphylococcus aureus: outcome and predictors of failure in a large retrospective multicenter study. Antibiotics 2021;10:1–13. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33530523/ . Accessed 3 June 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10020118 .
Lesens O, Ferry T, Forestier E, et al. Should we expand the indications for the DAIR (debridement, antibiotic therapy, and implant retention) procedure for Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic joint infections? A multicenter retrospective study. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2018;37:1949–1956. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30083889/ . Accessed 20 Mar 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10096-018-3330-7 .
Bouaziz A, Uçkay I, Lustig S, et al. Non-compliance with IDSA guidelines for patients presenting with methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic joint infection is a risk factor for treatment failure. Med Mal Infect 2018;48:207–211. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29122410/ . Accessed 3 June 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEDMAL.2017.09.016 .
Vilchez F, Martínez-Pastor JC, García-Ramiro S, et al. Outcome and predictors of treatment failure in early post-surgical prosthetic joint infections due to Staphylococcus aureus treated with debridement. Clin Microbiol Infect 2011;17:439–444. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20412187/ . Accessed 3 June 2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1469-0691.2010.03244.X .
Betz M, Abrassart S, Vaudaux P, et al. Increased risk of joint failure in hip prostheses infected with Staphylococcus aureus treated with debridement, antibiotics and implant retention compared to Streptococcus. Int Orthop 2015;39:397–401. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25183296/ . Accessed 20 Mar 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00264-014-2510-Z .
Swenson RD, Butterfield JA, Irwin TJ, Zurlo JJ, Davis CM. Preoperative anemia is associated with failure of open debridement polyethylene exchange in acute and acute hematogenous prosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplasty 2018;33:1855–1860. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29555498/ . Accessed 4 June 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ARTH.2018.01.042 .
Ahmad SS, Orlik L, Ahmad SJS, Albers CE, Siebenrock KA, Klenke FM. Obesity and smoking predict the results of two-stage exchange in septic revision hip arthroplasty: a cohort study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2019;105:467–471. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30922806/ . Accessed 4 June 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2019.01.006 .
Falagas ME, Kompoti M. Obesity and infection. Lancet Infect Dis 2006;6:438–446. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16790384/ . Accessed 20 Mar 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(06)70523-0 .
Zimmerli W, Widmer AF, Blatter M, Frei R, Ochsner PE. Role of rifampin for treatment of orthopedic implant-related staphylococcal infections: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Assoc 1998;279:1537–1541. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9605897/ . Accessed 4 June 2021. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.279.19.1537 .
El Helou OC, Berbari EF, Lahr BD, et al. Efficacy and safety of rifampin containing regimen for staphylococcal prosthetic joint infections treated with debridement and retention. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2010;29:961–967. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20505968/ . Accessed 4 June 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-010-0952-9 .
Widmer AF, Gaechter A, Ochsner PE, Zimmerli W. Antimicrobial treatment of orthopedic implant-related infections with rifampin combinations. Clin Infect Dis 1992;14:1251–1253. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1623081/ . Accessed 4 June 2021. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinids/14.6.1251 .
Beldman M, Löwik C, Soriano A, et al. If, when, and how to use rifampin in acute staphylococcal periprosthetic joint infections, a multicentre observational study. Clin Infect Dis 2021. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33970214/ . Accessed 4 June 2021. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciab426 .
Aydın O, Ergen P, Ozturan B, Ozkan K, Arslan F, Vahaboglu H. Rifampin-accompanied antibiotic regimens in the treatment of prosthetic joint infections: a frequentist and Bayesian meta-analysis of current evidence. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2021;40:665–671. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33125602/ . Accessed 20 Mar 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10096-020-04083-4 .
Scheper H, Gerritsen LM, Pijls BG, Van Asten SA, Visser LG, De Boer MGJ. Outcome of debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention for staphylococcal hip and knee prosthetic joint infections, focused on rifampicin use: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Open forum Infect Dis 2021;8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34258321/ . Accessed 20 Mar 2022. https://doi.org/10.1093/OFID/OFAB298 .
Del Toro MD, Nieto I, Guerrero F, et al. Are hip hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty infections different entities? The importance of hip fractures. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2014;33:1439–1448. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24671411/ . Accessed 4 June 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-014-2091-1 .