Effects of one long vs. two short resistance training sessions on training volume and affective responses in resistance-trained women.
EES
RPD
RPE
perception
sPDF
training frequency
Journal
Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
03
08
2022
accepted:
16
09
2022
entrez:
17
10
2022
pubmed:
18
10
2022
medline:
18
10
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to compare the acute effects of performing a lower body resistance training program in one long or two shorter sessions in 1 day on training volume and affective measures. Employing a randomized-crossover design, 23 resistance-trained women (22 ± 2 years, 166 ± 6 cm, and 66.4 ± 7.5 kg) performed two training days consisting of (i) one long (46 min) or (ii) two short sessions (total of 43 min) separated by 3.5-5 h. Each training day was separated by 4-6 days and consisted of three sets to failure for six exercises. Training volume (number of repetitions lifted) were recorded during the sessions. Rating of perceived exertion for effort (RPE), rating of perceived exertion for discomfort (RPD), session displeasure/pleasure (sPDF) and exercise enjoyment (EES) were measured 10 min after each session. Participants also completed a readiness to train questionnaire (7 questions), 24 h after each session, and which training protocol they preferred, 48 h after the last session. The long session led to higher RPE (+1 point,
Identifiants
pubmed: 36248475
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1010596
pmc: PMC9557220
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1010596Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Pedersen, Saeterbakken, Fimland, Iversen, Schoenfeld, Stien and Andersen.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Author BS serves on the scientific advisory board of Tonal Corporation, a manufacturer of fitness equipment. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Sports Med. 2020 Apr;50(4):679-687
pubmed: 31745731
J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2015 Oct;37(5):534-46
pubmed: 26524099
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1994 Mar;34(2):117-24
pubmed: 8187678
Sports Med. 2011 Aug 1;41(8):641-71
pubmed: 21780850
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Jul;43(7):1334-59
pubmed: 21694556
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 16;13:912368
pubmed: 35783742
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009 Mar;41(3):687-708
pubmed: 19204579
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2022 Jan 4;:1-6
pubmed: 34982021
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 18;16(8):e0256231
pubmed: 34407124
Int J Exerc Sci. 2018 May 01;11(5):226-238
pubmed: 29795737
Sports Med. 2005;35(10):841-51
pubmed: 16180944
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012 Oct;112(10):3629-39
pubmed: 22350356
Muscle Nerve. 2017 Oct;56(4):797-803
pubmed: 28006852
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2007 Jun;2(2):159-69
pubmed: 19124903
Exp Physiol. 2014 Feb;99(2):368-80
pubmed: 24142455
Sports Med. 2021 Oct;51(10):2079-2095
pubmed: 34125411
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2019 Oct 28;15(2):292-294
pubmed: 31172830
Int J Sports Med. 2019 Dec;40(13):850-855
pubmed: 31499564
Sports (Basel). 2017 Jun 28;5(3):
pubmed: 29910407
Sports Med Open. 2022 Jul 30;8(1):99
pubmed: 35907047
Sports Med. 2016 May;46(5):687-98
pubmed: 26780346
Sports Med. 2018 May;48(5):1207-1220
pubmed: 29470825
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2017 Sep;117(9):1877-1889
pubmed: 28698987
Eur J Sport Sci. 2021 May;21(5):647-655
pubmed: 32301681
J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Oct;31(10):2777-2784
pubmed: 28933712
J Sports Sci. 2005 May;23(5):477-500
pubmed: 16194996
Psychol Sport Exerc. 2008 May;9(3):231-245
pubmed: 18496608