Reliability of Subjective Assessment of Spectral-Domain OCT Pathologic Features by Multiple Raters in Retinal Vein Occlusion.
CME, cystoid macular edema
DME, diabetic macular edema
DRIL
DRIL, disorganization of retinal inner layers
DROL
DROL, disorganization of retinal outer layers
ELM, external limiting membrane
ERM, epiretinal membrane
EZ, ellipsoid zone
IZ, interdigitation zone
RVO
RVO, retinal vein occlusion
SD, spectral-domain
SD-OCT
SRF, subretinal fluid
VRT, vitreoretinal traction
interrater reliability
κC, Cohen’s κ
κF, Fleiss’ κ
Journal
Ophthalmology science
ISSN: 2666-9145
Titre abrégé: Ophthalmol Sci
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9918230896206676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2021
Jun 2021
Historique:
received:
18
02
2021
revised:
28
05
2021
accepted:
01
06
2021
entrez:
17
10
2022
pubmed:
5
6
2021
medline:
5
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To examine the interrater and intrarater reliability of qualitatively and quantitatively assessed disorganization of retinal inner layers (DRIL) and disorganization of retinal outer layers (DROL) by multiple raters. Subjectively assessing these surrogate biomarkers can be challenging in daily routine, despite the high resolution of spectral-domain (SD) OCT scans. Retrospective trial. Three hundred six pooled SD OCT scans of 34 patients treated for macular edema caused by retinal vein occlusion (RVO) between January 2016 and December 2017. SD OCT scans were assessed by 6 raters regarding presence of cystoid macular edema, subretinal fluid (SRF), vitreoretinal traction, and epiretinal membrane and extent of DRIL and DROL. Interrater and intrarater reliability were calculated applying κ statistics for qualitative assessment regarding each pathologic feature's presence in all evaluated OCT scans, and for quantified horizontal DRIL and DROL extent within each OCT cross-section. Cystoid macular edema and SRF assessments revealed excellent inter- and intrarater reliability with almost perfect strength of agreement, whereas subjective DRIL and DROL evaluations yielded low κ statistics with slight to moderate strength of agreement. Furthermore, the presence of SRF remarkably compromised the reliability of DROL detection. Our data highlight the limited subjective assessibility of DRIL and DROL, underscoring the need for automated image analysis to improve the reliability of OCT biomarkers for clinical studies and daily practice.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36249305
doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2021.100031
pii: S2666-9145(21)00029-4
pmc: PMC9562329
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100031Informations de copyright
© 2021 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
Références
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22(3):276-82
pubmed: 23092060
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 30;15(4):e0232494
pubmed: 32353052
Ophthalmic Res. 2020;63(1):13-17
pubmed: 31013497
Acta Ophthalmol. 2020 Nov;98(7):e801-e806
pubmed: 32115886
Retina. 2017 Nov;37(11):2015-2024
pubmed: 28092342
Retina. 2008 Nov-Dec;28(10):1502-8
pubmed: 18997611
Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 Jan;143(1):171-3
pubmed: 17188062
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019 Jan 1;137(1):46-47
pubmed: 30286233
Diabetes. 2015 Jul;64(7):2560-70
pubmed: 25633419
Am J Ophthalmol. 2017 Oct;182:160-167
pubmed: 28837790
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013 Feb;251(2):501-8
pubmed: 22653439
Ophthalmology. 2014 Dec;121(12):2423-31
pubmed: 25064723
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74
pubmed: 843571
Int J Ophthalmol. 2019 Jun 18;12(6):990-995
pubmed: 31236358
Am J Ophthalmol. 2018 Dec;196:129-135
pubmed: 30179599
Br J Ophthalmol. 2007 Dec;91(12):1644-9
pubmed: 17504858
Am J Ophthalmol. 2008 Feb;145(2):273-280
pubmed: 18045566
Acta Ophthalmol. 2011 Feb;89(1):e35-40
pubmed: 21155986
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Jul;133(7):820-5
pubmed: 25950417
Clin Ophthalmol. 2018 Apr 16;12:719-725
pubmed: 29713139
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019 Jan 1;137(1):38-46
pubmed: 30286219
Ophthalmologica. 2013;229(3):147-51
pubmed: 23485655
Br J Ophthalmol. 2016 Mar;100(3):295-9
pubmed: 26201354
Am J Ophthalmol. 2010 Jul;150(1):63-67.e1
pubmed: 20451897
Arch Ophthalmol. 2009 Dec;127(12):1596-602
pubmed: 20008714
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018 Nov 1;59(13):5481-5486
pubmed: 30452602
Ophthalmol Retina. 2018 Nov;2(11):1125-1132
pubmed: 30511035
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021 Oct;259(10):2897-2903
pubmed: 33861366
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014 Nov;132(11):1309-16
pubmed: 25058813
Am J Ophthalmol. 2005 Jan;139(1):87-99
pubmed: 15652832
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012 Jan;250(1):61-70
pubmed: 21874345
Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 22;9(1):12230
pubmed: 31439887
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018 Feb 1;136(2):202-208
pubmed: 29327033
Am J Ophthalmol. 2017 May;177:116-125
pubmed: 28237411
Retina. 2005 Jun;25(4):417-21
pubmed: 15933586
J Biophotonics. 2018 May;11(5):e201700313
pubmed: 29341445