Evaluation and update of the expert consensus guidelines for the assessment of the cortisol awakening response (CAR).

Adherence CAR Guidelines Measurement Saliva Update

Journal

Psychoneuroendocrinology
ISSN: 1873-3360
Titre abrégé: Psychoneuroendocrinology
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7612148

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2022
Historique:
received: 22 09 2022
accepted: 24 09 2022
pubmed: 18 10 2022
medline: 18 10 2022
entrez: 17 10 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The cortisol awakening response (CAR) is frequently assessed in psychobiological (stress) research. Obtaining reliable CAR data, however, requires careful attention to methodological detail. To promote best practice, expert consensus guidelines on the assessment of the CAR were published (Stalder et al., 2016, PNEC). However, it is unclear whether these highly cited guidelines have resulted in actual methodological improvements. To explore this, the PNEC editorial board invited the present authors to conduct a critical evaluation and update of current CAR methodology, which is reported here. (i) A quantitative evaluation of methodological quality of CAR research published in PNEC before and after the guidelines (2013-2015 vs. 2018-2020) was conducted. Disappointingly, results reveal little improvement in the implementation of central recommendations (especially objective time verification) in recent research. (ii) To enable an update of guidelines, evidence on recent developments in CAR assessment is reviewed, which mostly confirms the accuracy of the majority of the original guidelines. Moreover, recent technological advances, particularly regarding methods for the verification of awakening and sampling times, have emerged and may help to reduce costs in future research. (iii) To aid researchers and increase accessibility, an updated and streamlined version of the CAR consensus guidelines is presented. (iv) Finally, the response of the PNEC editorial board to the present results is described: potential authors of future CAR research to be published in PNEC will be required to submit a methodological checklist (based on the current guidelines) alongside their article. This will increase transparency and enable reviewers to readily assess the quality of the respective CAR data. Combined, it is hoped that these steps will assist researchers and reviewers in assuring higher quality CAR assessments in future research, thus yielding more reliable and reproducible results and helping to further advance this field of study.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36252387
pii: S0306-4530(22)00287-6
doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2022.105946
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

105946

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest none.

Auteurs

Tobias Stalder (T)

Department of Psychology, University of Siegen, Siegen, Germany. Electronic address: tobias.stalder@uni-siegen.de.

Sonia J Lupien (SJ)

Department of Psychiatry, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Brigitte M Kudielka (BM)

Department of Psychology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

Emma K Adam (EK)

School of Education and Social Policy, Northwestern University, Evanston, USA.

Jens C Pruessner (JC)

Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.

Stefan Wüst (S)

Department of Psychology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

Samantha Dockray (S)

School of Applied Psychology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.

Nina Smyth (N)

Department of Psychology, University of Westminster, London, UK.

Phil Evans (P)

Department of Psychology, University of Westminster, London, UK.

Clemens Kirschbaum (C)

Department of Psychology, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.

Robert Miller (R)

Department of Psychology, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.

Mark A Wetherell (MA)

Department of Psychology, Northumbria University, Newcastle, UK.

Johannes B Finke (JB)

Department of Psychology, University of Siegen, Siegen, Germany.

Tim Klucken (T)

Department of Psychology, University of Siegen, Siegen, Germany.

Angela Clow (A)

Department of Psychology, University of Westminster, London, UK.

Classifications MeSH