CRISPR/Cas9-induced knockout reveals the role of ABCB1 in the response to temozolomide, carmustine and lomustine in glioblastoma multiforme.

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common malignant brain tumor with limited therapeutic options. Besides surgery, chemotherapy using temozolomide, carmustine or lomustine is the main pillar of therapy. However, therapy success is limited and prognosis still is very poor. One restraining factor is drug resistance caused by drug transporters of the ATP-binding cassette family, e.g. ABCB1 and ABCG2, located at the blood-brain barrier and on tumor cells. The active efflux of xenobiotics including drugs, e.g. temozolomide, leads to low intracellular drug concentrations and subsequently insufficient anti-tumor effects. Nevertheless, the role of efflux transporters in GBM is controversially discussed. In the present study, we analyzed the role of ABCB1 and ABCG2 in GBM cells showing that ABCB1, but marginally ABCG2, is relevant. Applying a CRISPR/Cas9-derived ABCB1 knockout, the response to temozolomide was significantly augmented demonstrated by decreased cell number (p < 0.001) and proliferation rate (p = 0.04), while apoptosis was increased (p = 0.04). For carmustine, a decrease of cells in G1-phase was detected pointing to cell cycle arrest in the ABCB1 knockout (p = 0.006). For lomustine, however, loss of ABCB1 did not alter the response to the treatment. Overall, this study shows that ABCB1 is involved in the active transport of temozolomide out of the tumor cells diminishing the response to temozolomide. Interestingly, loss of ABCB1 also affected the response to the lipophilic drug carmustine. These findings show that ABCB1 is not only relevant at the blood-brain barrier, but also in the tumor cells diminishing success of chemotherapy.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.