What Heterogeneities in Individual-level Mobility Are Lost During Aggregation? Leveraging GPS Logger Data to Understand Fine-scale and Aggregated Patterns of Mobility.
Journal
The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene
ISSN: 1476-1645
Titre abrégé: Am J Trop Med Hyg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370507
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 11 2022
14 11 2022
Historique:
received:
14
03
2022
accepted:
18
08
2022
pubmed:
18
10
2022
medline:
22
11
2022
entrez:
17
10
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Human movement drives spatial transmission patterns of infectious diseases. Population-level mobility patterns are often quantified using aggregated data sets, such as census migration surveys or mobile phone data. These data are often unable to quantify individual-level travel patterns and lack the information needed to discern how mobility varies by demographic groups. Individual-level datasets can capture additional, more precise, aspects of mobility that may impact disease risk or transmission patterns and determine how mobility differs across cohorts; however, these data are rare, particularly in locations such as sub-Saharan Africa. Using detailed GPS logger data collected from three sites in southern Africa, we explore metrics of mobility such as percent time spent outside home, number of locations visited, distance of locations, and time spent at locations to determine whether they vary by demographic, geographic, or temporal factors. We further create a composite mobility score to identify how well aggregated summary measures would capture the full extent of mobility patterns. Although sites had significant differences in all mobility metrics, no site had the highest mobility for every metric, a distinction that was not captured by the composite mobility score. Further, the effects of sex, age, and season on mobility were all dependent on site. No factor significantly influenced the number of trips to locations, a common way to aggregate datasets. When collecting and analyzing human mobility data, it is difficult to account for all the nuances; however, these analyses can help determine which metrics are most helpful and what underlying differences may be present.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36252797
doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.22-0202
pii: tpmd220202
pmc: PMC9709031
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1145-1153Subventions
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : U19 AI089680
Pays : United States
Références
J Infect Dis. 2016 Dec 1;214(suppl_4):S414-S420
pubmed: 28830104
Vaccine. 2021 Apr 8;39(15):2124-2132
pubmed: 33736917
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010 Apr;82(4):723-30
pubmed: 20348526
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e52971
pubmed: 23326367
J Infect Dis. 2012 Nov 15;206(10):1622-9
pubmed: 22966127
R Soc Open Sci. 2016 Aug 3;3(8):160294
pubmed: 27853607
Malar J. 2014 Mar 28;13:125
pubmed: 24678587
Malar J. 2011 Jun 10;10:163
pubmed: 21663661
Lancet Digit Health. 2022 Jan;4(1):e27-e36
pubmed: 34740555
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81
pubmed: 18929686
Int J Health Geogr. 2012 Aug 14;11:33
pubmed: 22892045
Nature. 2021 Jul;595(7869):713-717
pubmed: 34192736
Science. 2012 Oct 12;338(6104):267-70
pubmed: 23066082
Med Vet Entomol. 1988 Apr;2(2):189-92
pubmed: 2980173
PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8(10):e1002699
pubmed: 23093917
Int J Health Geogr. 2019 Aug 19;18(1):19
pubmed: 31426819
Nat Commun. 2020 Sep 30;11(1):4961
pubmed: 32999287
Science. 2011 Dec 9;334(6061):1424-7
pubmed: 22158822
Science. 2020 Apr 10;368(6487):145-146
pubmed: 32205458
Bull World Health Organ. 1970;43(2):319-25
pubmed: 5312528
Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2019 Aug;34:48-54
pubmed: 31247417
PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e58802
pubmed: 23577059
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jan 15;110(3):994-9
pubmed: 23277539
Int J Health Geogr. 2009 Nov 30;8:68
pubmed: 19948034
PLoS Comput Biol. 2017 Feb 10;13(2):e1005382
pubmed: 28187123
Sci Rep. 2014 Jul 14;4:5678
pubmed: 25022440
Elife. 2021 Sep 17;10:
pubmed: 34533456
R Soc Open Sci. 2017 May 3;4(5):170046
pubmed: 28573009