Outcome of endovascular treatment of internal iliac artery aneurysms: a single center retrospective review.

Aneurysm Embolization Hypogastric artery Internal iliac artery Stent-graft Vascular plug

Journal

CVIR endovascular
ISSN: 2520-8934
Titre abrégé: CVIR Endovasc
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101738484

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 Oct 2022
Historique:
received: 19 07 2022
accepted: 11 10 2022
entrez: 18 10 2022
pubmed: 19 10 2022
medline: 19 10 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

To evaluate the technical feasibility and clinical outcomes of endovascular treatment for internal iliac artery (IIA) aneurysms. This was a retrospective analysis of 25 patients with 32 IIA aneurysms (mean diameter: 39.1 ± 12.6 mm) who underwent endovascular treatment over a 10-year period, and were available for follow-up. Univariate analysis was used to determine the association between variables (including aortoiliac involvement and technique) and outcome. The IIA inflow was covered with an iliac stent graft (N = 29) or embolized with a plug (N = 3). The IIA outflow was embolized in all but one case in which there was thrombotic occlusion of outflow branches. Outflow embolization using plugs or coils was performed in the distal IIA or anterior/posterior trunks in 9 cases and distal IIA branches in 22 cases. During a mean follow-up period of 39.9 months, 31.2% of aneurysms demonstrated endoleak and 12.5% demonstrated enlargement. Univariate analysis revealed that endoleak was associated with technical failure (p = 0.01) and that endoleak rate was higher in patients who underwent distal IIA branch embolization (p = 0.03). No variable was associated with sac expansion. Major complication occurred in one patient who died from aneurysm rupture. Minor complications were reported in six patients who developed femoral pseudoaneurysm (N = 2, 8%), buttock claudication (N = 3, 12%), and limb graft occlusion (N = 1, 4%). Endovascular treatment of IIA aneurysms effectively prevents sac expansion. Endoleak was more frequently observed in cases of technical failure and those in which distal IIA branches were embolized. Level 3b, retrospective cohort study.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36255546
doi: 10.1186/s42155-022-00330-1
pii: 10.1186/s42155-022-00330-1
pmc: PMC9579245
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

53

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s).

Références

Ann Vasc Surg. 2014 May;28(4):1070-7
pubmed: 24333603
J Vasc Surg. 1988 Aug;8(2):165-71
pubmed: 3294450
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2014 Apr;37(2):348-54
pubmed: 23842685
Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 Aug;67:158-170
pubmed: 32234400
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Dec;72(6):1968-1975
pubmed: 32276024
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Apr;47(4):708-713
pubmed: 18381130
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Mar;59(3):634-44
pubmed: 24571938
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Oct;70(4):1107-1114
pubmed: 31147136
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007 Jul;34(1):59-65
pubmed: 17400004
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2016 Nov;52(5):621-634
pubmed: 27600731
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017 Apr;53(4):534-548
pubmed: 28242154
ANZ J Surg. 2009 Apr;79(4):219-20
pubmed: 19432700
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Oct;58(4):861-9
pubmed: 23790453
ANZ J Surg. 2021 Nov;91(11):2397-2403
pubmed: 34595811
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Jun;47(6):1203-1210; discussion 1210-1
pubmed: 18514838
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021 Oct;62(4):532-539
pubmed: 34266764
Vascular. 2018 Dec;26(6):591-599
pubmed: 29863442
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Apr;31(2):127-31
pubmed: 27556311
Vascular. 2011 Dec;19(6):291-300
pubmed: 22048976
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003 Sep;14(9 Pt 2):S199-202
pubmed: 14514818
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2021 Apr;55(3):254-264
pubmed: 33353481
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015 Oct;50(4):474-9
pubmed: 26188719
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Jan;65(1):76-81
pubmed: 28010870
Ann Vasc Surg. 2001 May;15(3):312-20
pubmed: 11414081
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2005 Aug;30(2):119-29
pubmed: 15939637
J Vasc Bras. 2019 Apr 17;18:e20180115
pubmed: 31320888
J Surg Case Rep. 2020 Feb 21;2020(2):rjz409
pubmed: 32104568
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Oct;67(10):835-840
pubmed: 30810906
Semin Vasc Surg. 2009 Sep;22(3):193-200
pubmed: 19765531

Auteurs

Jinoo Kim (J)

Department of Radiology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Tooting, London, UK.
Department of Radiology, Ajou University Hospital, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.

Joo-Young Chun (JY)

Department of Radiology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Tooting, London, UK.

Seyed Ameli-Renani (S)

Department of Radiology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Tooting, London, UK.

Lakshmi Ratnam (L)

Department of Radiology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Tooting, London, UK.

Leto Mailli (L)

Department of Radiology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Tooting, London, UK.

Vyzantios Pavlidis (V)

Department of Radiology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Tooting, London, UK.

Raj Das (R)

Department of Radiology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Tooting, London, UK.

Robert Morgan (R)

Department of Radiology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Tooting, London, UK. robert.morgan@stgeorges.nhs.uk.

Classifications MeSH