Understanding Mental Health Apps for Youth: Focus Group Study With Latinx Youth.

CBT Latino Latinx child cognitive behavioral therapy digital health tool focus group health app human-centered design mHealth mental health mental health apps mindfulness mobile health mobile phone perspective qualitative teenager youth

Journal

JMIR formative research
ISSN: 2561-326X
Titre abrégé: JMIR Form Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101726394

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 Oct 2022
Historique:
received: 02 07 2022
accepted: 13 09 2022
revised: 12 09 2022
entrez: 18 10 2022
pubmed: 19 10 2022
medline: 19 10 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

An increasing number of mental health apps (MHapps) are being developed for youth. In addition, youth are high users of both technologies and MHapps. However, little is known about their perspectives on MHapps. MHapps might be particularly well suited to reach the youth underserved by traditional mental health resources, and incorporating their perspectives is especially critical to ensure such tools are useful to them. The goal of this study was to develop and pilot a process for eliciting youth perspectives on MHapps in a structured and collaborative way. We also sought to generate learnings on the perspectives of Latinx youth on MHapps and their use in ways that might facilitate discovery, activation, or engagement in MHapps, especially in Latinx populations. We created a series of focus groups consisting of 5 sessions. The groups introduced different categories of MHapps (cognitive behavioral therapy apps, mindfulness apps, and miscellaneous apps). Within each category, we selected 4 MHapps that participants chose to use for a week and provided feedback through both between-session and in-session activities. We recruited 5 youths ranging in age from 15 to 21 (mean 18, SD 2.2) years. All the participants identified as Hispanic or Latinx. After completing all 5 focus groups, the participants completed a brief questionnaire to gather their impressions of the apps they had used. Our focus group methodology collected detailed and diverse information about youth perspectives on MHapps. However, we did identify some aspects of our methods that were less successful at engaging the youth, such as our between-session activities. The Latinx youth in our study wanted apps that were accessible, relatable, youth centric, and simple and could be integrated with their offline lives. We also found that the mindfulness apps were viewed most favorably but that the miscellaneous and cognitive behavioral therapy apps were viewed as more impactful. Eliciting youth feedback on MHapps is critical if these apps are going to serve a role in supporting their mental health and well-being. We refined a process for collecting feedback from the youth and identified factors that were important to a set of Latinx youth. Future work could be broader, that is, recruit larger samples of more diverse youth, or deeper, that is, collect more information from each youth around interests, needs, barriers, or facilitators or better understand the various impacts of MHapps by using qualitative and quantitative measures. Nevertheless, this study advances the formative understanding of how the youth, particularly Latinx youth, might be viewing these tools.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
An increasing number of mental health apps (MHapps) are being developed for youth. In addition, youth are high users of both technologies and MHapps. However, little is known about their perspectives on MHapps. MHapps might be particularly well suited to reach the youth underserved by traditional mental health resources, and incorporating their perspectives is especially critical to ensure such tools are useful to them.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
The goal of this study was to develop and pilot a process for eliciting youth perspectives on MHapps in a structured and collaborative way. We also sought to generate learnings on the perspectives of Latinx youth on MHapps and their use in ways that might facilitate discovery, activation, or engagement in MHapps, especially in Latinx populations.
METHODS METHODS
We created a series of focus groups consisting of 5 sessions. The groups introduced different categories of MHapps (cognitive behavioral therapy apps, mindfulness apps, and miscellaneous apps). Within each category, we selected 4 MHapps that participants chose to use for a week and provided feedback through both between-session and in-session activities. We recruited 5 youths ranging in age from 15 to 21 (mean 18, SD 2.2) years. All the participants identified as Hispanic or Latinx. After completing all 5 focus groups, the participants completed a brief questionnaire to gather their impressions of the apps they had used.
RESULTS RESULTS
Our focus group methodology collected detailed and diverse information about youth perspectives on MHapps. However, we did identify some aspects of our methods that were less successful at engaging the youth, such as our between-session activities. The Latinx youth in our study wanted apps that were accessible, relatable, youth centric, and simple and could be integrated with their offline lives. We also found that the mindfulness apps were viewed most favorably but that the miscellaneous and cognitive behavioral therapy apps were viewed as more impactful.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Eliciting youth feedback on MHapps is critical if these apps are going to serve a role in supporting their mental health and well-being. We refined a process for collecting feedback from the youth and identified factors that were important to a set of Latinx youth. Future work could be broader, that is, recruit larger samples of more diverse youth, or deeper, that is, collect more information from each youth around interests, needs, barriers, or facilitators or better understand the various impacts of MHapps by using qualitative and quantitative measures. Nevertheless, this study advances the formative understanding of how the youth, particularly Latinx youth, might be viewing these tools.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36256835
pii: v6i10e40726
doi: 10.2196/40726
pmc: PMC9627467
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e40726

Informations de copyright

©Elena Agapie, Katherine Chang, Sneha Patrachari, Martha Neary, Stephen M Schueller. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 18.10.2022.

Références

Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2021 Aug;144(2):201-210
pubmed: 33835483
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Oct 15;3:133
pubmed: 33083568
Psychiatr Serv. 2021 Sep 1;72(9):1095-1098
pubmed: 33882716
J Med Internet Res. 2017 May 25;19(5):e176
pubmed: 28546138
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 May 29;8(5):e17458
pubmed: 32348289
Int J Child Comput Interact. 2022 Sep;33:100476
pubmed: 36034969
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2021 May-Jun;70:44-50
pubmed: 33714795
Digit Health. 2019 Jan 31;5:2055207619826678
pubmed: 30746154
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Jun;62(6):593-602
pubmed: 15939837
Front Psychiatry. 2018 Oct 18;9:481
pubmed: 30405450
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Sep 23;6(9):e39813
pubmed: 36149733
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2002 Jun;41(6):731-8
pubmed: 12049448
Front Digit Health. 2022 Sep 01;4:854263
pubmed: 36120712
Front Public Health. 2020 Feb 25;8:45
pubmed: 32161745
Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2017 Jan;26(1):1-12
pubmed: 27837935
Proc 18th ACM Int Conf Interact Des Child (2019). 2019 Jun;2019:26-37
pubmed: 32954383
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 May 1;74(5):476-484
pubmed: 28384733
JMIR Ment Health. 2019 Mar 21;6(3):e11572
pubmed: 30896433
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2017 Apr;58(4):474-503
pubmed: 27943285
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Sep 25;21(9):e14567
pubmed: 31573916
Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 Mar-Apr;27(2):393-403
pubmed: 18332495
Am J Psychiatry. 2002 Sep;159(9):1548-55
pubmed: 12202276
Internet Interv. 2016 May;4(2):152-158
pubmed: 27398319
Am J Psychiatry. 2020 May 1;177(5):464-465
pubmed: 32354266
Evid Based Ment Health. 2019 Nov;22(4):161-166
pubmed: 31358537
Psychiatr Serv. 2018 May 1;69(5):498-500
pubmed: 29446337
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1996 Aug;35(8):1086-94
pubmed: 8755806
JMIR Ment Health. 2021 Aug 5;8(8):e28360
pubmed: 34081592
Acad Psychiatry. 2016 Dec;40(6):898-904
pubmed: 27421839
Health Informatics J. 2020 Sep;26(3):2042-2066
pubmed: 31920160
Front Digit Health. 2022 Apr 25;4:848052
pubmed: 35547091
JAMA Pediatr. 2022 Jun 1;176(6):545-546
pubmed: 35404381
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2014 Nov 05;2(4):e46
pubmed: 25373390
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jan 17;19(1):e14
pubmed: 28096066
World Psychiatry. 2019 Oct;18(3):325-336
pubmed: 31496095
Behav Res Ther. 2021 Dec;147:103990
pubmed: 34715396
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2020 Nov-Dec;49(6):820-836
pubmed: 31407937
Int J Health Serv. 2016 Oct;46(4):810-24
pubmed: 27520100
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Jun 10;4(2):e72
pubmed: 27287964
Med J Aust. 2007 Oct 1;187(S7):S35-9
pubmed: 17908023
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Apr 20;9(4):e21085
pubmed: 33877050
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Mar 11;3(1):e27
pubmed: 25760773
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2020 Aug;61(8):928-940
pubmed: 32572961
NPJ Digit Med. 2019 Oct 18;2:104
pubmed: 31646184
Psychiatr Serv. 2009 Oct;60(10):1365-71
pubmed: 19797377

Auteurs

Elena Agapie (E)

Department of Informatics, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.

Katherine Chang (K)

Department of Psychological Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.

Sneha Patrachari (S)

Department of Informatics, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.

Martha Neary (M)

Department of Psychological Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.

Stephen M Schueller (SM)

Department of Informatics, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
Department of Psychological Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.

Classifications MeSH