Performance of 5-Strand Hamstring Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the STABILITY Study: A Subgroup Analysis.


Journal

The American journal of sports medicine
ISSN: 1552-3365
Titre abrégé: Am J Sports Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7609541

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 2022
Historique:
pubmed: 20 10 2022
medline: 4 11 2022
entrez: 19 10 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions (ACLRs) with graft diameters <8mm have been shown to have higher revision rates. The 5-strand (5S) hamstring autograft configuration is a proposed option to increase graft diameter. To investigate the differences in clinical outcomes between 4-strand (4S) and 5S hamstring autografts for ACLR in patients who underwent ACLR alone or concomitantly with a lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) procedure. Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Data from the STABILITY study were analyzed to compare a subgroup of patients undergoing ACLR alone or with a concomitant LET procedure (ACLR + LET) with a minimum graft diameter of 8mm that had either a 4S or 5S hamstring autograft configuration. The primary outcome was clinical failure, a composite of rotatory laxity and/or graft failure. The secondary outcome measures consisted of 2 patient-reported outcome scores (PROs)-namely, the ACL Quality of Life Questionnaire (ACL-QoL) and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score at 24 months postoperatively. Of the 618 patients randomized in the STABILITY study, 399 (228 male; 57%) fit the inclusion criteria for this study. Of these, 191 and 208 patients underwent 4S and 5S configurations of hamstring ACLR, respectively, with a minimum graft diameter of 8mm. Both groups had similar characteristics other than differences in anthropometric factors-namely, sex, height, and weight, and Beighton scores. The primary outcomes revealed no difference between the 2 groups in rotatory stability (odds ratio [OR], 1.19; 95% CI, 0.77-1.84; At the 24-month follow-up, there were no significant differences in clinical failure rates and PROs in an analysis of patients with 4S and 5S hamstring autografts of ≥8mm diameter for ACLR or ACLR + LET. The 5S hamstring graft configuration is a viable option to produce larger-diameter ACL grafts.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions (ACLRs) with graft diameters <8mm have been shown to have higher revision rates. The 5-strand (5S) hamstring autograft configuration is a proposed option to increase graft diameter.
PURPOSE
To investigate the differences in clinical outcomes between 4-strand (4S) and 5S hamstring autografts for ACLR in patients who underwent ACLR alone or concomitantly with a lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) procedure.
STUDY DESIGN
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.
METHODS
Data from the STABILITY study were analyzed to compare a subgroup of patients undergoing ACLR alone or with a concomitant LET procedure (ACLR + LET) with a minimum graft diameter of 8mm that had either a 4S or 5S hamstring autograft configuration. The primary outcome was clinical failure, a composite of rotatory laxity and/or graft failure. The secondary outcome measures consisted of 2 patient-reported outcome scores (PROs)-namely, the ACL Quality of Life Questionnaire (ACL-QoL) and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score at 24 months postoperatively.
RESULTS
Of the 618 patients randomized in the STABILITY study, 399 (228 male; 57%) fit the inclusion criteria for this study. Of these, 191 and 208 patients underwent 4S and 5S configurations of hamstring ACLR, respectively, with a minimum graft diameter of 8mm. Both groups had similar characteristics other than differences in anthropometric factors-namely, sex, height, and weight, and Beighton scores. The primary outcomes revealed no difference between the 2 groups in rotatory stability (odds ratio [OR], 1.19; 95% CI, 0.77-1.84;
CONCLUSION
At the 24-month follow-up, there were no significant differences in clinical failure rates and PROs in an analysis of patients with 4S and 5S hamstring autografts of ≥8mm diameter for ACLR or ACLR + LET. The 5S hamstring graft configuration is a viable option to produce larger-diameter ACL grafts.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36260487
doi: 10.1177/03635465221128581
pmc: PMC9630854
doi:

Types de publication

Randomized Controlled Trial Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

3502-3509

Références

Arthroscopy. 2015 Jun;31(6):1084-90
pubmed: 25703286
Joint Bone Spine. 2007 Dec;74(6):594-9
pubmed: 17888709
Am J Sports Med. 2007 Nov;35(11):1945-9
pubmed: 17644660
Am J Sports Med. 2005 Oct;33(10):1492-8
pubmed: 16009992
Am J Sports Med. 1998 May-Jun;26(3):350-9
pubmed: 9617395
Arthroscopy. 2017 May;33(5):1062-1071.e5
pubmed: 28359669
Acta Orthop Belg. 2016 Mar;82(1):72-7
pubmed: 26984657
Int Orthop. 2016 Jan;40(1):173-81
pubmed: 26105766
Arthroscopy. 2012 Apr;28(4):526-31
pubmed: 22305299
Rheumatol Int. 2021 Oct;41(10):1707-1716
pubmed: 33738549
Arthroscopy. 2014 Jul;30(7):882-90
pubmed: 24951356
J Knee Surg. 2019 Apr;32(4):366-371
pubmed: 29618144
Arthroscopy. 2015 Oct;31(10):2022-34
pubmed: 26116497
Clin Sports Med. 2018 Jan;37(1):75-86
pubmed: 29173559
J Knee Surg. 2017 Nov;30(9):916-919
pubmed: 28282673
Arthroscopy. 2018 Aug;34(8):2457-2462
pubmed: 29859772
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Sep;43(9):2189-97
pubmed: 26093007
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012 Jan;20(1):5-47
pubmed: 22105976
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2017 Feb 21;9(1):6989
pubmed: 28286624
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Dec;477(12):2677-2684
pubmed: 31764334
Arthroscopy. 2013 Dec;29(12):1948-53
pubmed: 24140144
Int Orthop. 2020 Mar;44(3):577-584
pubmed: 31879811
Arthroscopy. 2017 May;33(5):1007-1013
pubmed: 28082062
Arthrosc Tech. 2014 Jul 07;3(4):e423-6
pubmed: 25276603
Arthroscopy. 2021 Feb;37(2):579-585
pubmed: 32828934
Orthop J Sports Med. 2017 May 09;5(5):2325967117704630
pubmed: 28540317
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 May;21(5):1111-8
pubmed: 22688502
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jul;45(9):2092-2097
pubmed: 28460194
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 May 15;20(1):216
pubmed: 31092226
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Feb;48(2):285-297
pubmed: 31940222
Arthroscopy. 2018 Sep;34(9):2633-2640
pubmed: 29804953
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Jun;47(7):1576-1582
pubmed: 31095404

Auteurs

Parth Lodhia (P)

University of British Columbia, New Westminster, Canada.

Goris Nazari (G)

Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Dianne Bryant (D)

The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.

Alan Getgood (A)

Western Ontario University, London, Ontario, Canada.

Robert McCormack (R)

University of British Columbia, New Westminster, Canada.

Michal Daniluk (M)

London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic, London, Canada.

Kyrsten Payne (K)

Fraser Orthopaedic Institute, New Westminster, Canada.

Jeremy Tynedal (J)

Banff Sport Medicine, Banff, Canada.

Celeste Ferguson (C)

Pan Am Clinic, Winnipeg, Canada.

Michelle Mayer (M)

Sport Medicine Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.

Ajaykumar Shanmugaraj (A)

McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.

Murray Tough (M)

Queens University, Kingston, Canada.

Charlie-Marie Suddens (CM)

University Hospitals Coventry Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.

Mieke Van Haver (M)

Antwerp Orthopaedic Center, Ghent, Belgium.
Investigation performed at University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH