Performance of 5-Strand Hamstring Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the STABILITY Study: A Subgroup Analysis.
4-strand hamstring autograft
5-strand hamstring autograft
anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
lateral extra-articular tenodesis
Journal
The American journal of sports medicine
ISSN: 1552-3365
Titre abrégé: Am J Sports Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7609541
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2022
11 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
20
10
2022
medline:
4
11
2022
entrez:
19
10
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions (ACLRs) with graft diameters <8mm have been shown to have higher revision rates. The 5-strand (5S) hamstring autograft configuration is a proposed option to increase graft diameter. To investigate the differences in clinical outcomes between 4-strand (4S) and 5S hamstring autografts for ACLR in patients who underwent ACLR alone or concomitantly with a lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) procedure. Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Data from the STABILITY study were analyzed to compare a subgroup of patients undergoing ACLR alone or with a concomitant LET procedure (ACLR + LET) with a minimum graft diameter of 8mm that had either a 4S or 5S hamstring autograft configuration. The primary outcome was clinical failure, a composite of rotatory laxity and/or graft failure. The secondary outcome measures consisted of 2 patient-reported outcome scores (PROs)-namely, the ACL Quality of Life Questionnaire (ACL-QoL) and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score at 24 months postoperatively. Of the 618 patients randomized in the STABILITY study, 399 (228 male; 57%) fit the inclusion criteria for this study. Of these, 191 and 208 patients underwent 4S and 5S configurations of hamstring ACLR, respectively, with a minimum graft diameter of 8mm. Both groups had similar characteristics other than differences in anthropometric factors-namely, sex, height, and weight, and Beighton scores. The primary outcomes revealed no difference between the 2 groups in rotatory stability (odds ratio [OR], 1.19; 95% CI, 0.77-1.84; At the 24-month follow-up, there were no significant differences in clinical failure rates and PROs in an analysis of patients with 4S and 5S hamstring autografts of ≥8mm diameter for ACLR or ACLR + LET. The 5S hamstring graft configuration is a viable option to produce larger-diameter ACL grafts.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions (ACLRs) with graft diameters <8mm have been shown to have higher revision rates. The 5-strand (5S) hamstring autograft configuration is a proposed option to increase graft diameter.
PURPOSE
To investigate the differences in clinical outcomes between 4-strand (4S) and 5S hamstring autografts for ACLR in patients who underwent ACLR alone or concomitantly with a lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) procedure.
STUDY DESIGN
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.
METHODS
Data from the STABILITY study were analyzed to compare a subgroup of patients undergoing ACLR alone or with a concomitant LET procedure (ACLR + LET) with a minimum graft diameter of 8mm that had either a 4S or 5S hamstring autograft configuration. The primary outcome was clinical failure, a composite of rotatory laxity and/or graft failure. The secondary outcome measures consisted of 2 patient-reported outcome scores (PROs)-namely, the ACL Quality of Life Questionnaire (ACL-QoL) and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score at 24 months postoperatively.
RESULTS
Of the 618 patients randomized in the STABILITY study, 399 (228 male; 57%) fit the inclusion criteria for this study. Of these, 191 and 208 patients underwent 4S and 5S configurations of hamstring ACLR, respectively, with a minimum graft diameter of 8mm. Both groups had similar characteristics other than differences in anthropometric factors-namely, sex, height, and weight, and Beighton scores. The primary outcomes revealed no difference between the 2 groups in rotatory stability (odds ratio [OR], 1.19; 95% CI, 0.77-1.84;
CONCLUSION
At the 24-month follow-up, there were no significant differences in clinical failure rates and PROs in an analysis of patients with 4S and 5S hamstring autografts of ≥8mm diameter for ACLR or ACLR + LET. The 5S hamstring graft configuration is a viable option to produce larger-diameter ACL grafts.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36260487
doi: 10.1177/03635465221128581
pmc: PMC9630854
doi:
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3502-3509Références
Arthroscopy. 2015 Jun;31(6):1084-90
pubmed: 25703286
Joint Bone Spine. 2007 Dec;74(6):594-9
pubmed: 17888709
Am J Sports Med. 2007 Nov;35(11):1945-9
pubmed: 17644660
Am J Sports Med. 2005 Oct;33(10):1492-8
pubmed: 16009992
Am J Sports Med. 1998 May-Jun;26(3):350-9
pubmed: 9617395
Arthroscopy. 2017 May;33(5):1062-1071.e5
pubmed: 28359669
Acta Orthop Belg. 2016 Mar;82(1):72-7
pubmed: 26984657
Int Orthop. 2016 Jan;40(1):173-81
pubmed: 26105766
Arthroscopy. 2012 Apr;28(4):526-31
pubmed: 22305299
Rheumatol Int. 2021 Oct;41(10):1707-1716
pubmed: 33738549
Arthroscopy. 2014 Jul;30(7):882-90
pubmed: 24951356
J Knee Surg. 2019 Apr;32(4):366-371
pubmed: 29618144
Arthroscopy. 2015 Oct;31(10):2022-34
pubmed: 26116497
Clin Sports Med. 2018 Jan;37(1):75-86
pubmed: 29173559
J Knee Surg. 2017 Nov;30(9):916-919
pubmed: 28282673
Arthroscopy. 2018 Aug;34(8):2457-2462
pubmed: 29859772
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Sep;43(9):2189-97
pubmed: 26093007
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012 Jan;20(1):5-47
pubmed: 22105976
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2017 Feb 21;9(1):6989
pubmed: 28286624
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Dec;477(12):2677-2684
pubmed: 31764334
Arthroscopy. 2013 Dec;29(12):1948-53
pubmed: 24140144
Int Orthop. 2020 Mar;44(3):577-584
pubmed: 31879811
Arthroscopy. 2017 May;33(5):1007-1013
pubmed: 28082062
Arthrosc Tech. 2014 Jul 07;3(4):e423-6
pubmed: 25276603
Arthroscopy. 2021 Feb;37(2):579-585
pubmed: 32828934
Orthop J Sports Med. 2017 May 09;5(5):2325967117704630
pubmed: 28540317
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 May;21(5):1111-8
pubmed: 22688502
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jul;45(9):2092-2097
pubmed: 28460194
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 May 15;20(1):216
pubmed: 31092226
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Feb;48(2):285-297
pubmed: 31940222
Arthroscopy. 2018 Sep;34(9):2633-2640
pubmed: 29804953
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Jun;47(7):1576-1582
pubmed: 31095404