Assessing the state of care for Huntington disease in the United States: Results from a survey of practices treating Huntington disease patients.

Care Huntington disease Practice survey

Journal

Clinical parkinsonism & related disorders
ISSN: 2590-1125
Titre abrégé: Clin Park Relat Disord
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101761473

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 21 02 2022
revised: 05 08 2022
accepted: 31 08 2022
entrez: 20 10 2022
pubmed: 21 10 2022
medline: 21 10 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

No study to date has thoroughly examined US Huntington disease (HD) care delivery in a variety of clinic settings by HD specialists and non-specialists. To obtain a clearer understanding of current care structure and delivery of care through a survey of representative US physicians treating HD patients. We designed and fielded a survey of 40 closed-ended evaluative items and one open-ended item to a sample of 339 US practices. Unique to this survey was the inclusion of non-specialists. Responses were received from 156 practices (overall response rate 46.02 %), with 52.6 % from academic sites, 35.3 % from private practices, and 12.2 % from the VA. More than half (63.5 %) of the practice leads were movement disorder trained or Directors of HDSA Centers of Excellence and 58.3 % had an HD or multidisciplinary care clinic. However, 48.7 % of the practices saw 1-25 HD patients, 28.2 % saw 26-100 HD patients, and 23.1 % served over 100 HD patients annually. Most practices (>69 %) reported having difficulty providing social work, genetic counseling, care coordination and psychologists/psychiatrists. Increased HD practice size was associated with higher rates of pre-visit screenings, care navigator/care coordinators, routine monitoring of weight, and provision of genetic counseling by genetic counselors. Not surprisingly, we found that HD care was inconsistently applied across the US. Practices led by neurologists trained in movement disorders, and higher HD volume practices, tended to be better equipped to provide multi-disciplinary staffing and procedures as compared to those with fewer numbers of HD patients.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
No study to date has thoroughly examined US Huntington disease (HD) care delivery in a variety of clinic settings by HD specialists and non-specialists.
Objective UNASSIGNED
To obtain a clearer understanding of current care structure and delivery of care through a survey of representative US physicians treating HD patients.
Methods UNASSIGNED
We designed and fielded a survey of 40 closed-ended evaluative items and one open-ended item to a sample of 339 US practices. Unique to this survey was the inclusion of non-specialists.
Results UNASSIGNED
Responses were received from 156 practices (overall response rate 46.02 %), with 52.6 % from academic sites, 35.3 % from private practices, and 12.2 % from the VA. More than half (63.5 %) of the practice leads were movement disorder trained or Directors of HDSA Centers of Excellence and 58.3 % had an HD or multidisciplinary care clinic. However, 48.7 % of the practices saw 1-25 HD patients, 28.2 % saw 26-100 HD patients, and 23.1 % served over 100 HD patients annually. Most practices (>69 %) reported having difficulty providing social work, genetic counseling, care coordination and psychologists/psychiatrists. Increased HD practice size was associated with higher rates of pre-visit screenings, care navigator/care coordinators, routine monitoring of weight, and provision of genetic counseling by genetic counselors.
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
Not surprisingly, we found that HD care was inconsistently applied across the US. Practices led by neurologists trained in movement disorders, and higher HD volume practices, tended to be better equipped to provide multi-disciplinary staffing and procedures as compared to those with fewer numbers of HD patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36262527
doi: 10.1016/j.prdoa.2022.100165
pii: S2590-1125(22)00036-6
pmc: PMC9574766
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

100165

Informations de copyright

© 2022 The Authors.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Références

Front Neurol. 2019 Jul 03;10:710
pubmed: 31333565
Rev Neurol (Paris). 2016 Aug - Sep;172(8-9):423-432
pubmed: 27561440
PLoS Curr. 2011 Sep 20;3:RRN1261
pubmed: 21947193
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Dec 18;69(50):1902-1905
pubmed: 33332297
J Huntingtons Dis. 2019;8(4):509-519
pubmed: 31594241
PLoS Curr. 2011 Aug 30;3:RRN1259
pubmed: 21975525
J Huntingtons Dis. 2016 Jun 27;5(2):207-13
pubmed: 27372053
Neurology. 2012 Aug 7;79(6):597-603
pubmed: 22815556
Neurology. 2020 Feb 4;94(5):217-228
pubmed: 31907286
Handb Clin Neurol. 2017;144:167-178
pubmed: 28947115

Auteurs

Lauren Seeberger (L)

University of Colorado, USA.

Jody Corey-Bloom (J)

University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.

Michael O'Brien (M)

Huntington Study Group, Rochester, NY, USA.

Diana Slowiejko (D)

Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA.

Danielle Schlang (D)

RAND Health Care, Santa Monica, CA, USA.

Marika S Booth (MS)

RAND Health Care, Santa Monica, CA, USA.

Beth Ann Griffin (B)

RAND Health Care, Santa Monica, CA, USA.

Peggy G Chen (PG)

RAND Health Care, Santa Monica, CA, USA.

Classifications MeSH