The Effect of Teach-Back Combined with King Interactive Standard Mode on the Life of COPD Patients.
Journal
Contrast media & molecular imaging
ISSN: 1555-4317
Titre abrégé: Contrast Media Mol Imaging
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101286760
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
12
07
2022
revised:
02
08
2022
accepted:
16
08
2022
entrez:
20
10
2022
pubmed:
21
10
2022
medline:
22
10
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
COPD is a common clinical chronic airway inflammatory disease that occurs mostly in middle-aged and older adults over the age of 40. The incidence of COPD is increasing year by year and the onset of age is gradually becoming younger. To observe the effect of teach-back combined with king interaction on the life of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A total of 100 COPD patients admitted to our hospital from Jan 2021 to Jan 2022 were retrospectively selected to be divided into 50 cases in the control group and 50 cases in the observation group according to the nursing methods. The control group was treated with routine nursing intervention, while the observation group was treated with teach-back combined with king interactive standard mode intervention. The differences in Self-Care Ability Assessment Scale (ESCA) score, St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score, Mental State Assessment Scale (MSSNS) score, 6-minute walking distance (6MWD), and pulmonary function indexes were compared between the two groups before and after the intervention. The success rate and patient compliance of each index in the groups were also recorded. After 3 months and 6 months of intervention, the total SGRO score and its factor scores of self-care skills, self-care responsibility, self-concept, health knowledge level in them were all higher than those before the intervention, while the total SGRO score and its factor scores of respiratory symptoms, activity limitation, disease influence, and so on were all decreased compared with those before the intervention. The ESCA score of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control one after 3 months and 6 months of intervention, while the SGRQ score was significantly lower than that of the control one, with statistical significance ( The use of teach-back combined with king interactive standard mode in COPD patients can improve the patient's self-care ability, reduce psychological negative emotions, and improve the quality of life.
Sections du résumé
Background
COPD is a common clinical chronic airway inflammatory disease that occurs mostly in middle-aged and older adults over the age of 40. The incidence of COPD is increasing year by year and the onset of age is gradually becoming younger.
Objective
To observe the effect of teach-back combined with king interaction on the life of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
Methods
A total of 100 COPD patients admitted to our hospital from Jan 2021 to Jan 2022 were retrospectively selected to be divided into 50 cases in the control group and 50 cases in the observation group according to the nursing methods. The control group was treated with routine nursing intervention, while the observation group was treated with teach-back combined with king interactive standard mode intervention. The differences in Self-Care Ability Assessment Scale (ESCA) score, St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score, Mental State Assessment Scale (MSSNS) score, 6-minute walking distance (6MWD), and pulmonary function indexes were compared between the two groups before and after the intervention. The success rate and patient compliance of each index in the groups were also recorded.
Results
After 3 months and 6 months of intervention, the total SGRO score and its factor scores of self-care skills, self-care responsibility, self-concept, health knowledge level in them were all higher than those before the intervention, while the total SGRO score and its factor scores of respiratory symptoms, activity limitation, disease influence, and so on were all decreased compared with those before the intervention. The ESCA score of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control one after 3 months and 6 months of intervention, while the SGRQ score was significantly lower than that of the control one, with statistical significance (
Conclusion
The use of teach-back combined with king interactive standard mode in COPD patients can improve the patient's self-care ability, reduce psychological negative emotions, and improve the quality of life.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36262987
doi: 10.1155/2022/4638745
pmc: PMC9553485
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
4638745Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Jiaxi Rang et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Références
Ergonomics. 2021 Jan;64(1):55-68
pubmed: 32799753
Clin Respir J. 2020 Feb;14(2):109-115
pubmed: 31729154
Anal Methods. 2021 Oct 8;13(38):4437-4441
pubmed: 34487126
COPD. 2021 Apr;18(2):254-263
pubmed: 33709848
J Cancer Educ. 2020 Apr;35(2):366-372
pubmed: 30680649
J Am Board Fam Med. 2020 Nov-Dec;33(6):978-985
pubmed: 33219076
Radiother Oncol. 2021 Jul;160:78-81
pubmed: 33901563
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021 Apr;47(2):547-555
pubmed: 31555875
JAMA. 2020 Feb 4;323(5):455-465
pubmed: 32016309
Radiology. 2021 Jun;299(3):703-711
pubmed: 33825508
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Nov;104(11):2700-2705
pubmed: 34400041
Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2021 Apr;42:32-40
pubmed: 33745600
Int J Cardiol. 2021 May 15;331:214-220
pubmed: 33587941
J Asthma. 2021 Sep;58(9):1169-1175
pubmed: 32441557
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Feb 1;201(3):294-302
pubmed: 31657634
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2021 Jul;18(7):1138-1146
pubmed: 33347376
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2020 Dec;20(6):661-672
pubmed: 31596632
J Am Board Fam Med. 2020 Nov-Dec;33(6):903-912
pubmed: 33219069
Clin Exp Med. 2021 Aug;21(3):457-465
pubmed: 33611777
Clin Respir J. 2021 Apr;15(4):389-399
pubmed: 33217151
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Sep;28(34):47463-47473
pubmed: 33893585
Nurs Forum. 2021 Jul;56(3):766-771
pubmed: 33931873
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Apr;75(4):e13921
pubmed: 33336836
J Patient Saf. 2021 Jun 1;17(4):305-310
pubmed: 30882616