Does Research Training lead to Academic Success in Orthopedic Surgery? An Analysis of U.S Academic Orthopedic Surgeons.
NIH funding
PhD
academic training
h-Index
research fellowship
Journal
Orthopedic reviews
ISSN: 2035-8164
Titre abrégé: Orthop Rev (Pavia)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101524779
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
entrez:
20
10
2022
pubmed:
21
10
2022
medline:
21
10
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Academic surgeons are invaluable for scientific advancement and training the next generation of orthopedic surgeons. This study aimed to describe a cohort of academic orthopedic surgeons currently in practice with common academic metrics. ACGME-accredited orthopedic surgery programs with a university affiliation were identified. The primary independent variable in this study was formal research training as defined by a research fellowship or attainment of a PhD. Outcomes included academic rank, h-index attained, number of publications, and funding by the National Institutes of Health (NIH). 1641 orthopedic surgeons were identified across 73 programs. 116 surgeons (7.07%) received formal academic research training. The academic training group and non-academic training group had a similar completion rate of clinical fellowship programs (93.97% vs 93.77%, p=0.933), attainment of other advanced degrees (10.34% vs 8.46%, p=0.485), and years since completion of training (17.49-years vs 16.28-years, p=0.284). Surgeons completing academic research training had a significantly higher h-index (18.46 vs 10.88, p<0.001), higher publication number (67.98 vs 37.80, p<0.001), and more likely to be NIH funded (16.38% vs 3.15%, p<0.001). Surgeons completing academic training were more likely to be associate professors (34.48% vs 25.77%), professors (25.00% vs 22.82%), and endowed professors (10.34% vs 2.43%) (p<0.001). On regression analysis, formalized research training was independently associated with h-index and NIH funding (p<0.001 for both). Formalized research training, either as a research fellowship or PhD, is associated with an increased h-index and likelihood of NIH funding, although this association was not found for academic rank after adjusted regression analysis.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Academic surgeons are invaluable for scientific advancement and training the next generation of orthopedic surgeons.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to describe a cohort of academic orthopedic surgeons currently in practice with common academic metrics.
METHODS
METHODS
ACGME-accredited orthopedic surgery programs with a university affiliation were identified. The primary independent variable in this study was formal research training as defined by a research fellowship or attainment of a PhD. Outcomes included academic rank, h-index attained, number of publications, and funding by the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
RESULTS
RESULTS
1641 orthopedic surgeons were identified across 73 programs. 116 surgeons (7.07%) received formal academic research training. The academic training group and non-academic training group had a similar completion rate of clinical fellowship programs (93.97% vs 93.77%, p=0.933), attainment of other advanced degrees (10.34% vs 8.46%, p=0.485), and years since completion of training (17.49-years vs 16.28-years, p=0.284). Surgeons completing academic research training had a significantly higher h-index (18.46 vs 10.88, p<0.001), higher publication number (67.98 vs 37.80, p<0.001), and more likely to be NIH funded (16.38% vs 3.15%, p<0.001). Surgeons completing academic training were more likely to be associate professors (34.48% vs 25.77%), professors (25.00% vs 22.82%), and endowed professors (10.34% vs 2.43%) (p<0.001). On regression analysis, formalized research training was independently associated with h-index and NIH funding (p<0.001 for both).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Formalized research training, either as a research fellowship or PhD, is associated with an increased h-index and likelihood of NIH funding, although this association was not found for academic rank after adjusted regression analysis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36263194
doi: 10.52965/001c.38655
pii: 38655
pmc: PMC9560893
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
38655Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
DA, MBC, MK, JC, KJ, and CLM have nothing to disclose. EOK reports the following: consulting fees from Seaspine and Spineart. AHD reports the following disclosures: consulting fees from Stryker, Orthofix, Spineart, and EOS, research support from Southern Spine, and Fellowship support from Orthofix.
Références
Int J Dr Stud. 2020;15:461-483
pubmed: 33815015
Laryngoscope. 2017 Jan;127(1):E15-E21
pubmed: 27578559
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 May 18;98(10):e41
pubmed: 27194503
J Osteopath Med. 2022 Jan 27;122(4):195-202
pubmed: 35086186
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Aug;128(2):559-565
pubmed: 21788848
BMJ. 2020 Jun 25;369:m2081
pubmed: 32586791
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Oct;18 Suppl 2:S48-53
pubmed: 21999558
J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Sep;18(9):705-10
pubmed: 12950478
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019 Feb 1;27(3):e118-e126
pubmed: 30199475
J Surg Educ. 2016 May-Jun;73(3):422-8
pubmed: 26796512
Med Educ. 2010 Oct;44(10):985-95
pubmed: 20880368
J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Sep;18(9):711-6
pubmed: 12950479
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 May 4;98(9):788-95
pubmed: 27147692
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Sep;134(3):570-578
pubmed: 25158713