Magnetic resonance imaging reveals possible cause of diplopia after Baerveldt glaucoma implantation.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 10 07 2022
accepted: 10 10 2022
entrez: 20 10 2022
pubmed: 21 10 2022
medline: 25 10 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

To assess if ocular motility impairment, and the ensuing diplopia, after Baerveldt Glaucoma device (BGI) implantation, is related to the presence of a large fluid reservoir (bleb), using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). In a masked observational study (CCMO-registry number: NL65633.058.18), the eyes of 30 glaucoma patients with (n = 12) or without diplopia (n = 18) who had previously undergone BGI implantation were scanned with a 7 Tesla MRI-scanner. The substructures of the BGI-complex, including both blebs and plate, were segmented in 3D. Primary outcomes were a comparison of volume and height of the BGI-complex between patients with and without diplopia. Comparisons were performed by using an unpaired t-test, Fisher's Exact or Mann-Whitney test. Correlations were determined by using Spearman correlation. The median volume and height of the BGI-complex was significantly higher in patients with compared to patients without diplopia (p = 0.007 and p = 0.025, respectively). Six patients had an excessively large total bleb volume (median of 1736.5mm3, interquartile range 1486.3-1933.9mm3), four of whom experienced diplopia (33% of the diplopia patients). Fibrotic strands through the BGI plate, intended to limit the height of the bleb, could be visualized but were not related to diplopia (75% versus 88%; p = 0.28). With MRI, we show that in a significant number of diplopia cases a large bleb is present in the orbit. Given the large volume of these blebs, they are a likely explanation of the development of diplopia in at least some of the patients with diplopia after BGI implantation. Additionally, the MR-images confirm the presence of fibrotic strands. As these strands are also visible in patients with a large bleb, they are apparently not sufficient to restrict the bleb height.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36264982
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276527
pii: PONE-D-22-17957
pmc: PMC9584370
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Observational Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0276527

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

J.W.B. reports research support from Philips Healthcare during the conduct of the study. All other authors declare that no competing interests exists. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Références

NMR Biomed. 2021 Jan;34(1):e4407
pubmed: 32893386
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2014 Mar;25(2):148-53
pubmed: 24463417
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2018 Sep 13;7(5):7
pubmed: 30221073
Acta Ophthalmol. 2020 Jun;98(4):400-407
pubmed: 31729825
Strabismus. 2011 Jun;19(2):43-51
pubmed: 21635165
Strabismus. 2005 Mar;13(1):21-6
pubmed: 15824013
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 07;10(12):e0144595
pubmed: 26641251
Semin Plast Surg. 2015 Aug;29(3):135-44
pubmed: 26306080
Ophthalmology. 2011 Jul;118(7):1481-1481.e2
pubmed: 21724046
Ophthalmology. 2015 Feb;122(2):308-16
pubmed: 25439606
Am J Ophthalmol. 2012 May;153(5):789-803.e2
pubmed: 22245458
J Glaucoma. 2009 Aug;18(6):453-9
pubmed: 19680053
BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2021 Nov 23;6(1):e000855
pubmed: 34901465
NMR Biomed. 2013 Dec;26(12):1864-9
pubmed: 24123279
J AAPOS. 2013 Apr;17(2):192-6
pubmed: 23622451
Am J Ophthalmol. 1995 Jul;120(1):32-40
pubmed: 7611327
eNeuro. 2022 Jan 7;9(1):
pubmed: 34876474
Ophthalmology. 1993 Jun;100(6):914-8
pubmed: 8510906
Rom J Ophthalmol. 2017 Jul-Sep;61(3):166-170
pubmed: 29450393
J Cardiol. 2015 Dec;66(6):520-6
pubmed: 25981868
Int Ophthalmol. 1997-1998;21(4):213-21
pubmed: 9700009
Clin Ophthalmol. 2020 Sep 24;14:2789-2797
pubmed: 33061263
Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 Mar;147(3):458-66
pubmed: 19038375
Neuroimage. 2006 Jul 1;31(3):1116-28
pubmed: 16545965
Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 Nov;144(5):643-7
pubmed: 17707329
Acta Ophthalmol. 2021 Sep;99(6):e949-e955
pubmed: 33576161
J AAPOS. 2015 Jun;19(3):281-4
pubmed: 25907830
Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 12;7(1):11345
pubmed: 28900148

Auteurs

Esma Islamaj (E)

Rotterdam Ophthalmic Institute, Rotterdam Eye Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Luc Van Vught (L)

Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.

Caroline P Jordaan-Kuip (CP)

Rotterdam Ophthalmic Institute, Rotterdam Eye Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Koenraad A Vermeer (KA)

Rotterdam Ophthalmic Institute, Rotterdam Eye Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Teresa A Ferreira (TA)

Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.

Peter W T De Waard (PWT)

Department of Glaucoma, Rotterdam Eye Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Hans G Lemij (HG)

Department of Glaucoma, Rotterdam Eye Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Jan-Willem M Beenakker (JM)

Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH