Low-Dose vs High-Dose Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons for Femoropopliteal Lesions: 2-Year Results From the COMPARE Trial.
Humans
Paclitaxel
/ adverse effects
Popliteal Artery
/ diagnostic imaging
Angioplasty, Balloon
/ adverse effects
Vascular Access Devices
Peripheral Arterial Disease
/ diagnostic imaging
Prospective Studies
Pilot Projects
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
Cardiovascular Agents
/ adverse effects
Coated Materials, Biocompatible
Vascular Patency
Treatment Outcome
Time Factors
Femoral Artery
/ diagnostic imaging
Constriction, Pathologic
paclitaxel-coated balloons
patency
peripheral vascular disease
superficial femoral artery
Journal
JACC. Cardiovascular interventions
ISSN: 1876-7605
Titre abrégé: JACC Cardiovasc Interv
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101467004
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 10 2022
24 10 2022
Historique:
received:
02
05
2022
revised:
26
07
2022
accepted:
02
08
2022
entrez:
20
10
2022
pubmed:
21
10
2022
medline:
25
10
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
So far only 1-year data have been reported for direct comparisons of paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCBs) using different coating technologies. The aim of this study was to report the 24-month results on the efficacy and safety of low-dose vs high-dose PCBs with nominal paclitaxel densities of 2.0 and 3.5 μg/mm Within a prospective, multicenter, clinical trial, 414 patients with symptomatic femoropopliteal lesions (Rutherford categories 2-4, maximum lesion length 30 cm) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to endovascular treatment with either a low-dose (Ranger) or a high-dose (IN.PACT) PCB after stratification for lesion length. Two-year follow-up included assessment of primary patency (defined as absence of CD TLR or binary restenosis with a peak systolic velocity ratio >2.4 by duplex ultrasound), safety, and functional and clinical outcomes. At 2 years, the Kaplan-Meier estimates of primary patency were 70.6% and 71.4% for the low-dose and high-dose PCBs (log-rank P = 0.96), respectively. One major amputation occurred in the high-dose group, and rates of all-cause mortality (3.6% vs 2.2%; P = 0.55) and CD TLR (17.3% vs 13.0%; P = 0.31) were similar between the groups. Among a total of 57 CD TLRs, 44.6% were performed for reocclusion and 28.1% for in-stent restenosis. Functional and clinical benefits over baseline were sustained in both groups. The 2-year results of the COMPARE trial demonstrate a sustained treatment benefit of both low-dose and high-dose PCBs for femoropopliteal interventions including a wide range of lesion lengths. (Compare I Pilot Study for the Treatment of Subjects With Symptomatic Femoropopliteal Artery Disease; NCT02701543).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
So far only 1-year data have been reported for direct comparisons of paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCBs) using different coating technologies.
OBJECTIVES
The aim of this study was to report the 24-month results on the efficacy and safety of low-dose vs high-dose PCBs with nominal paclitaxel densities of 2.0 and 3.5 μg/mm
METHODS
Within a prospective, multicenter, clinical trial, 414 patients with symptomatic femoropopliteal lesions (Rutherford categories 2-4, maximum lesion length 30 cm) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to endovascular treatment with either a low-dose (Ranger) or a high-dose (IN.PACT) PCB after stratification for lesion length. Two-year follow-up included assessment of primary patency (defined as absence of CD TLR or binary restenosis with a peak systolic velocity ratio >2.4 by duplex ultrasound), safety, and functional and clinical outcomes.
RESULTS
At 2 years, the Kaplan-Meier estimates of primary patency were 70.6% and 71.4% for the low-dose and high-dose PCBs (log-rank P = 0.96), respectively. One major amputation occurred in the high-dose group, and rates of all-cause mortality (3.6% vs 2.2%; P = 0.55) and CD TLR (17.3% vs 13.0%; P = 0.31) were similar between the groups. Among a total of 57 CD TLRs, 44.6% were performed for reocclusion and 28.1% for in-stent restenosis. Functional and clinical benefits over baseline were sustained in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS
The 2-year results of the COMPARE trial demonstrate a sustained treatment benefit of both low-dose and high-dose PCBs for femoropopliteal interventions including a wide range of lesion lengths. (Compare I Pilot Study for the Treatment of Subjects With Symptomatic Femoropopliteal Artery Disease; NCT02701543).
Identifiants
pubmed: 36265942
pii: S1936-8798(22)01547-3
doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.08.004
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Paclitaxel
P88XT4IS4D
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
DFC2HB4I0K
Cardiovascular Agents
0
Coated Materials, Biocompatible
0
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02701543']
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Multicenter Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2093-2102Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Funding Support and Author Disclosures The study sponsor is the University of Leipzig, with funding through a research grant from Boston Scientific. The funding source was not involved in collecting, monitoring, or analyzing study data. Investigators (Drs Steiner and Scheinert) prepared all data presentation and manuscript drafts, which were then critically reviewed and edited by the other authors. The funding source had no access to data or manuscript review. Dr Steiner has been a consultant for Bayer, Boston Scientific, and Cook Medical; and has received research funding from C.R. Bard. Dr Schmidt has received consulting and speaker honoraria from C.R. Bard, Cook, and Cordis. Dr Zeller has received honoraria from Abbott Vascular, Veryan, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Cook Medical, Gore & Associates, Medtronic, Philips-Spectranetics, TriReme, and Shockwave; has consulted for Boston Scientific, Cook Medical, Gore & Associates, Medtronic, Spectranetics, Veryan, Intact Vascular, B. Braun, Shockwave, Bayer, and Vesper Medical; has received research, clinical trial, or drug study funding from 480 Biomedical, Bard Peripheral Vascular, Veryan, Biotronik, Cook Medical, Gore & Associates, Medtronic, Philips, Terumo, TriReme, Veryan, Shockwave, Med Alliance, Intact Vascular, and B. Braun; and holds common stock in QT Medical. Dr Tepe is on the advisory board for Medtronic and Philips; and has received study support from Bard, Bayer, B. Braun, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Cardiovascular Systems, Gore, Verian, and Shockwave. Dr Blessing has received honoraria from Abbott Vascular, B. Braun, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Cook Medical, Gore & Associates, Medtronic, Philips-Spectranetics, and Shockwave; and is a consultant for Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Bayer. Dr Langhoff has received consulting and speaker honoraria from Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Abbott, Contego Medical, Terumo, Cardinal Health, Alvimedica, B. Braun, and Kardionet; and has received speaker honoraria from C. R. Bard and Bayer. Dr Weiss has received speaker honoraria or research funding from C.R. Bard, Terumo, Optimed, Amgen, Bayer, Esperion, Pfizer, Pluristem, and Ticeba. Dr Scheinert is a consultant or an advisory board member for Abbott, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Cook Medical, Cordis, C.R. Bard, Gardia Medical, Medtronic/Covidien, TriReme Medical, Trivascular, and Upstream Peripheral Technologies. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.