The use of suprapectineal plate in acetabular fractures via ilioinguinal approach with Stoppa window.
Acetabular fracture
Stoppa approach.
ilioinguinal approach
suprapectineal plate
Journal
Orthopedic reviews
ISSN: 2035-8164
Titre abrégé: Orthop Rev (Pavia)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101524779
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
entrez:
21
10
2022
pubmed:
22
10
2022
medline:
22
10
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The aim of the study was to investigate the clinical results of open reduction and internal fixation using a suprapectineal buttress plate for specific acetabular fractures. We conducted a retrospective study involving thirty-three patients with specific acetabular fractures in an academic level 2 trauma center. We performed the ilioinguinal approach with Stoppa window for buttress plating of the quadrilateral surface. Clinical examination, radiographs and computed tomography were done using criteria described by Matta. Functional outcome was evaluated by visual analog scale (VAS), WOMAC, Harris Hip score modified, Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) and modified Merle d'Aubignè scoring system. Average follow-up was 40.4 months with a minimum of 24 months. Mean age was 59.09 years. The 82% of patients were treated with a suprapectineal plate using ilioinguinal approach with Stoppa window. The 18% of patients required a Kocher-Langenbeck approach in order to get anatomic reduction of posterior wall or column. The 91% of patients were satisfied of their condition during activity of day living and only a small cohort reported walking aids. The worst clinical results were obtained in patients characterized by highest step displacement. Deep infection of surgical wound was observed in 6% of patients. In 3% of patients, one vascular injury occurred during surgery. Internal fixation using ilioinguinal approach with Stoppa window and a suprapectineal plate to buttress the quadrilateral plate should be considered a viable treatment of some acetabular fractures. Patients can expect a good functional outcome with a low complication rate.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36267223
doi: 10.52965/001c.38556
pii: 38556
pmc: PMC9568421
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
38556Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest
Références
Injury. 2007 Apr;38(4):410-5
pubmed: 17397845
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 Nov;78(11):1632-45
pubmed: 8934477
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2019 Jan 23;9(1):e3
pubmed: 31086721
J Trauma. 2011 Jan;70(1):244-6
pubmed: 21217495
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006 Oct;88(10):1272-8
pubmed: 17012413
J Orthop Trauma. 2010 May;24(5):271-8
pubmed: 20418731
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jan;99(4):e18395
pubmed: 31977843
Injury. 2020 Feb;51(2):347-351
pubmed: 31843199
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005 Jan;87(1):2-9
pubmed: 15686228
Turk J Med Sci. 2019 Feb 11;49(1):442-448
pubmed: 30761832
Injury. 2011 Oct;42(10):1130-4
pubmed: 21156315
J Orthop Trauma. 2004 Mar;18(3):175-8
pubmed: 15091273
J Orthop Trauma. 2017 Jul;31(7):e210-e216
pubmed: 28240619
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993 Dec;(297):28-32
pubmed: 8242945
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Jun 6;100(11):922-929
pubmed: 29870442
Injury. 2019 Aug;50 Suppl 4:S11-S20
pubmed: 30683569
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Aug;(305):112-23
pubmed: 8050220
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Nov 14;14(1):364
pubmed: 31727107
J Orthop Trauma. 2010 May;24(5):263-70
pubmed: 20418730
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988 May;(230):83-97
pubmed: 3365902