Farnesoid X receptor agonist tropifexor attenuates cholestasis in a randomised trial in patients with primary biliary cholangitis.

AE, adverse event ALP, alkaline phosphatase ALT, alanine aminotransferase AUC, area under the concentration–time curve C4, 7-alpha-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one CL/F,ss, the apparent systemic clearance following oral administration at steady state Cmax, maximum plasma concentration FGF19, fibroblast growth factor 19 FXR, farnesoid X receptor Farnesoid X receptor GGT, γ-glutamyl transferase HDL, high-density lipoprotein LDL, low-density lipoprotein NASH, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis OCA, obeticholic acid PBC, primary biliary cholangitis PD, pharmacodynamic PRO, patient-reported outcome Primary biliary cholangitis Proof of concept Pruritus QoL, quality of life Racc, accumulation ratio SAE, serious adverse event Tmax, time to reach Cmax Tropifexor ULN, upper limit of normal VAS, visual analogue scale pBAD, primary bile acid diarrhoea qd, once daily γ-Glutamyl transferase

Journal

JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology
ISSN: 2589-5559
Titre abrégé: JHEP Rep
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101761237

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2022
Historique:
received: 05 07 2022
accepted: 12 07 2022
entrez: 21 10 2022
pubmed: 22 10 2022
medline: 22 10 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The safety, tolerability, and efficacy of the non-bile acid farnesoid X receptor agonist tropifexor were evaluated in a phase II, double-blind, placebo-controlled study as potential second-line therapy for patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) with an inadequate ursodeoxycholic acid response. Patients were randomised (2:1) to receive tropifexor (30, 60, 90, or 150 μg) or matched placebo orally once daily for 28 days, with follow-up on Days 56 and 84. Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability of tropifexor and reduction in levels of γ-glutamyl transferase (GGT) and other liver biomarkers. Other objectives included patient-reported outcome measures using the PBC-40 quality-of-life (QoL) and visual analogue scale scores and tropifexor pharmacokinetics. Of 61 enrolled patients, 11, 9, 12, and 8 received 30-, 60-, 90-, and 150-μg tropifexor, respectively, and 21 received placebo; 3 patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events (AEs) in the 150-μg tropifexor group. Pruritus was the most frequent AE in the study (52.5% [tropifexor] Tropifexor showed improvement in cholestatic markers relative to placebo, predictable pharmacokinetics, and an acceptable safety-tolerability profile, thereby supporting its potential further clinical development for PBC. The bile acid ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is the standard-of-care therapy for primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), but approximately 40% of patients have an inadequate response to this therapy. Tropifexor is a highly potent non-bile acid agonist of the farnesoid X receptor that is under clinical development for various chronic liver diseases. In the current study, in patients with an inadequate response to UDCA, tropifexor was found to be safe and well tolerated, with improved levels of markers of bile duct injury at very low (microgram) doses. Itch of mild to moderate severity was observed in all groups including placebo but was more frequent at the highest tropifexor dose. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02516605).

Sections du résumé

Background & Aims UNASSIGNED
The safety, tolerability, and efficacy of the non-bile acid farnesoid X receptor agonist tropifexor were evaluated in a phase II, double-blind, placebo-controlled study as potential second-line therapy for patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) with an inadequate ursodeoxycholic acid response.
Methods UNASSIGNED
Patients were randomised (2:1) to receive tropifexor (30, 60, 90, or 150 μg) or matched placebo orally once daily for 28 days, with follow-up on Days 56 and 84. Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability of tropifexor and reduction in levels of γ-glutamyl transferase (GGT) and other liver biomarkers. Other objectives included patient-reported outcome measures using the PBC-40 quality-of-life (QoL) and visual analogue scale scores and tropifexor pharmacokinetics.
Results UNASSIGNED
Of 61 enrolled patients, 11, 9, 12, and 8 received 30-, 60-, 90-, and 150-μg tropifexor, respectively, and 21 received placebo; 3 patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events (AEs) in the 150-μg tropifexor group. Pruritus was the most frequent AE in the study (52.5% [tropifexor]
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
Tropifexor showed improvement in cholestatic markers relative to placebo, predictable pharmacokinetics, and an acceptable safety-tolerability profile, thereby supporting its potential further clinical development for PBC.
Lay summary UNASSIGNED
The bile acid ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is the standard-of-care therapy for primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), but approximately 40% of patients have an inadequate response to this therapy. Tropifexor is a highly potent non-bile acid agonist of the farnesoid X receptor that is under clinical development for various chronic liver diseases. In the current study, in patients with an inadequate response to UDCA, tropifexor was found to be safe and well tolerated, with improved levels of markers of bile duct injury at very low (microgram) doses. Itch of mild to moderate severity was observed in all groups including placebo but was more frequent at the highest tropifexor dose.
Clinical Trials Registration UNASSIGNED
This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02516605).

Identifiants

pubmed: 36267872
doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2022.100544
pii: S2589-5559(22)00116-1
pmc: PMC9576902
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02516605']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

100544

Subventions

Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/L001489/1
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

© 2022 The Authors.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

CS is a consultant for Novartis and BiomX and has received honoraria from Falk Pharma and research funding from Galapagos and BiomX. HW is a consultant for or has received speaker fees from Falk Foundation, BMS, AbbVie, Norgine, Merz, Mallinckrodt, MYR GmbH, Gilead, MSD, and Intercept. AM has research grants from Merck and Intercept and has received speaker’s and teaching honoraria from Intercept. GMH has consulted for Intercept, Genfit, Cymabay, GSK, Novartis, Pliant, Falk Pharma. CL has research grants from Novartis, Gilead, Intercept, Enanta, NGM, Genfit, Cara Therapeutics, CymaBay, Target PharmaSolutions, Genkyotex, GSK, Durect, Pliant, High Tide and Zydus, and is a consultant for Genfit, GSK, CymaBay, Mirum, Cara therapeutics, Pliant, Shire, Target PharmaSolutions, Calliditas, and Escient. KVK is on the Advisory Committee or Review Panel of 89Bio, Gilead, CymaBay, Intercept, Genfit, and Madrigal; is a consultant for Calliditas, Intercept, HighTide, Mirum, and Novo Nordisk; has received grant/research support from Allergan, Gilead, Intercept, Genfit, Novartis, Enanta, HighTide, CymaBay, GSK, Pfizer, Madrigal, Viking, Metacrine, Pliant, and Hanmi; has received speaker’s and teaching honoraria from AbbVie, Gilead, and Intercept; and is a stock shareholder of Inipharm. PM has received speaker’s honoraria from Alfa Wasserman and Chiesi. EJ is an investigator in clinical trials sponsored by Allergan, BMS, Celgene, CymaBay, Dr Falk, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Pfizer, MSD, Novartis, and Roche; has received speaker’s honoraria from AbbVie, BMS, Gilead, Janssen, MSD, and Roche. ESM has no conflicts of interest to disclose. LBK was an employee of Novartis until study completion and is a stockholder of Novartis. DJ has received grant funding from Intercept and Pfizer; is a consultant for Abbott, Genkyotex, GSK and Intercept; and has received speaker fees from Falk, Abbott, and Intercept. JS is a contractor with Novartis. PK, SC, and JC were employees of Novartis until manuscript finalisation. MKB is an employee and stockholder of Novartis. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details.

Références

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Sep;52(5):808-820
pubmed: 32702169
Lancet. 2015 Oct 17;386(10003):1565-75
pubmed: 26364546
Hepatology. 2019 Jan;69(1):394-419
pubmed: 30070375
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jun 07;378(23):2171-2181
pubmed: 29874528
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Jun;4(6):445-453
pubmed: 30922873
J Med Chem. 2002 Aug 15;45(17):3569-72
pubmed: 12166927
Hepatology. 2019 Sep;70(3):788-801
pubmed: 30661255
Gut. 2005 Nov;54(11):1622-9
pubmed: 15961522
J Hepatol. 2019 Aug;71(2):357-365
pubmed: 30980847
J Clin Invest. 2013 Apr;123(4):1513-30
pubmed: 23524965
Hepatol Commun. 2019 May 17;3(8):1085-1097
pubmed: 31388629
Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2018 Nov;14(11):654-657
pubmed: 30538606
J Clin Invest. 2003 Dec;112(11):1678-87
pubmed: 14623915
J Hepatol. 2017 Jul;67(1):145-172
pubmed: 28427765
Front Pharmacol. 2018 Nov 08;9:1283
pubmed: 30467479
Gut. 2018 Sep;67(9):1568-1594
pubmed: 29593060
Hepatology. 2008 Sep;48(3):871-7
pubmed: 18752324
J Hepatol. 2012 May;56(5):1181-1188
pubmed: 22245904
Gastroenterology. 2015 Apr;148(4):751-61.e8
pubmed: 25500425
Gastroenterology. 2014 Dec;147(6):1338-49.e5; quiz e15
pubmed: 25160979
Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2020 Apr;9(3):395-410
pubmed: 31823525
N Engl J Med. 1994 May 12;330(19):1342-7
pubmed: 8152446
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Aug;19(8):1688-1697.e14
pubmed: 32777554
N Engl J Med. 1991 May 30;324(22):1548-54
pubmed: 1674105
Acta Derm Venereol. 2012 Sep;92(5):497-501
pubmed: 22102095
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 May 21;116(21):10525-10530
pubmed: 31068464
J Med Chem. 2017 Dec 28;60(24):9960-9973
pubmed: 29148806
Ann Hepatol. 2020 Jan - Feb;19(1):5-16
pubmed: 31771820
Gastroenterology. 2015 Apr;148(4):704-6
pubmed: 25724453
N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 18;375(7):631-43
pubmed: 27532829
Am J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jan;114(1):48-63
pubmed: 30429590
Hepatology. 2012 Oct;56(4):1391-400
pubmed: 22473838

Auteurs

Christoph Schramm (C)

Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik Universitätsklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Martin Zeitz Center for Rare Diseases, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Hamburg Center of Translational Immunology, Hamburg, Germany.

Heiner Wedemeyer (H)

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Essen University Hospital, Essen, Germany.

Andrew Mason (A)

Division of Gastroenterology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

Gideon M Hirschfield (GM)

Toronto Centre for Liver Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Cynthia Levy (C)

University of Miami, Schiff Center for Liver Diseases, Miami, FL, USA.

Kris V Kowdley (KV)

Liver Institute Northwest, Washington State University, Seattle, WA, USA.

Piotr Milkiewicz (P)

Liver and Internal Medicine Unit, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Translational Medicine Group, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.

Ewa Janczewska (E)

ID Clinic, Myslowice Poland.
Department of Basic Medical Sciences, School of Health Sciences in Bytom, Medical University of Silesia, Bytom, Poland.

Elena Sergeevna Malova (ES)

Medical Company Hepatolog, LLC, Samara, Russia.

Johanne Sanni (J)

Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland.
Sannity Consulting Ltd, Worthing, UK.

Phillip Koo (P)

Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA.

Jin Chen (J)

Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA.

Subhajit Choudhury (S)

Novartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad, India.

Lloyd B Klickstein (LB)

Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Michael K Badman (MK)

Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA, USA.

David Jones (D)

The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle, UK.

Classifications MeSH