Cortical tension regulates desmosomal morphogenesis.
Keratin
actin
adhesion
desmocollin
desmoglein
desmoplakin
desmosome
myosin II
Journal
Frontiers in cell and developmental biology
ISSN: 2296-634X
Titre abrégé: Front Cell Dev Biol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101630250
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
17
05
2022
accepted:
14
09
2022
entrez:
21
10
2022
pubmed:
22
10
2022
medline:
22
10
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Mechanical stability is a fundamental and essential property of epithelial cell sheets. It is in large part determined by cell-cell adhesion sites that are tightly integrated by the cortical cytoskeleton. An intimate crosstalk between the adherens junction-associated contractile actomyosin system and the desmosome-anchored keratin intermediate filament system is decisive for dynamic regulation of epithelial mechanics. A major question in the field is whether and in which way mechanical stress affects junctional plasticity. This is especially true for the desmosome-keratin scaffold whose role in force-sensing is virtually unknown. To examine this question, we inactivated the actomyosin system in human keratinocytes (HaCaT) and canine kidney cells (MDCK) and monitored changes in desmosomal protein turnover. Partial inhibition of myosin II by para-nitro-blebbistatin led to a decrease of the cells' elastic modulus and to reduced desmosomal protein turnover in regions where nascent desmosomes are formed and, to a lower degree, in regions where larger, more mature desmosomes are present. Interestingly, desmosomal proteins are affected differently: a significant decrease in turnover was observed for the desmosomal plaque protein desmoplakin I (DspI), which links keratin filaments to the desmosomal core, and the transmembrane cadherin desmoglein 2 (Dsg2). On the other hand, the turnover of another type of desmosomal cadherin, desmocollin 2 (Dsc2), was not significantly altered under the tested conditions. Similarly, the turnover of the adherens junction-associated E-cadherin was not affected by the low doses of para-nitro-blebbistatin. Inhibition of actin polymerization by low dose latrunculin B treatment and of ROCK-driven actomyosin contractility by Y-27632 treatment also induced a significant decrease in desmosomal DspI turnover. Taken together, we conclude that changes in the cortical force balance affect desmosome formation and growth. Furthermore, they differentially modulate desmosomal protein turnover resulting in changes of desmosome composition. We take the observations as evidence for a hitherto unknown desmosomal mechanosensing and mechanoresponse pathway responding to an altered force balance.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36268507
doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.946190
pii: 946190
pmc: PMC9577410
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
946190Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Moch, Schieren and Leube.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Cells. 2021 Jul 20;10(7):
pubmed: 34360001
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Nov 13;109(46):18815-20
pubmed: 23112161
Elife. 2022 Feb 18;11:
pubmed: 35179484
Mol Biol Cell. 2017 Nov 7;28(23):3156-3164
pubmed: 28495795
Elife. 2018 Jul 12;7:
pubmed: 29999492
J Biol Chem. 2011 Jan 14;286(2):1499-507
pubmed: 21071449
Med Res Rev. 2014 Nov;34(6):1127-45
pubmed: 24549583
J Cell Biol. 2005 Dec 19;171(6):1045-59
pubmed: 16365169
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021 Sep 23;9:745670
pubmed: 34631720
J Invest Dermatol. 2013 Oct;133(10):2318-2323
pubmed: 23812234
J Cell Sci. 1993 Jul;105 ( Pt 3):753-64
pubmed: 8408302
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Feb 21;22(4):
pubmed: 33669958
BMC Bioinformatics. 2017 Nov 29;18(1):529
pubmed: 29187165
J Struct Biol. 2021 Sep;213(3):107749
pubmed: 34033898
J Cell Biol. 1988 Mar;106(3):761-71
pubmed: 2450098
Annu Rev Pathol. 2022 Jan 24;17:47-72
pubmed: 34425055
Front Immunol. 2022 May 12;13:882116
pubmed: 35634274
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 30;9(1):e87809
pubmed: 24498201
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2020 Feb;77(3):543-558
pubmed: 31243490
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015 Nov;1853(11 Pt B):3053-64
pubmed: 25975455
Cell Tissue Res. 2003 Dec;314(3):399-410
pubmed: 14564504
Curr Top Dev Biol. 2015;112:65-102
pubmed: 25733138
J Cell Biol. 1987 May;104(5):1389-402
pubmed: 2437129
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2011 Apr;68(8):1439-54
pubmed: 20859650
Nat Methods. 2012 Jun 28;9(7):676-82
pubmed: 22743772
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jun 25;110(26):10664-9
pubmed: 23757496
Essays Biochem. 2019 Oct 31;63(5):521-533
pubmed: 31652439
PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e28963
pubmed: 22194961
Mol Biol Cell. 2010 Aug 15;21(16):2844-59
pubmed: 20554761
Nat Commun. 2018 Dec 11;9(1):5284
pubmed: 30538252
J Biol Chem. 2008 Jun 27;283(26):18303-13
pubmed: 18434319
Pflugers Arch. 2012 Nov;464(5):503-12
pubmed: 22990759
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2010 Feb;2(2):a000125
pubmed: 20182611
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2018 Nov 1;10(11):
pubmed: 28893859
Oncogene. 2012 Mar 29;31(13):1636-48
pubmed: 21841821
J Cell Sci. 2002 Apr 15;115(Pt 8):1717-32
pubmed: 11950889
Cells. 2018 Jun 26;7(7):
pubmed: 29949915
J Cell Biol. 2013 May 27;201(5):681-92
pubmed: 23690176
J Cell Biol. 2022 Feb 9;221(3):
pubmed: 35139142
J Cell Biol. 1995 Nov;131(3):745-60
pubmed: 7593194
J Cell Biol. 2011 Dec 26;195(7):1185-203
pubmed: 22184201
J Cell Sci. 2018 Jul 19;131(14):
pubmed: 30026344
J Cell Sci. 2021 Nov 1;134(21):
pubmed: 34635908
J Cell Sci. 2017 Oct 15;130(20):3437-3445
pubmed: 29032358
Int J Biol Sci. 2007 Jun 01;3(5):303-17
pubmed: 17589565
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2014 Jul 28;53(31):8211-5
pubmed: 24954740