Augmented reality during parotid surgery: real-life evaluation of voice control of a head mounted display.
Augmented reality
Head mounted display
HoloLens
Parotid surgery
Salivary glands
Voice control
Journal
European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
ISSN: 1434-4726
Titre abrégé: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9002937
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2023
Apr 2023
Historique:
received:
04
08
2022
accepted:
08
10
2022
pubmed:
22
10
2022
medline:
9
3
2023
entrez:
21
10
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Augmented Reality can improve surgical planning and performance in parotid surgery. For easier application we implemented a voice control manual for our augmented reality system. The aim of the study was to evaluate the feasibility of the voice control in real-life situations. We used the HoloLens 1 In silence, 100% of commands were recognized. If the volume of the operation room (OR) background noise exceeds 42 dB, the recognition rate decreases significantly, and it drops below 40% at > 60 dB SPL. With constant speech volume at 65 dB SPL male speakers had a significant better recognition rate than female speakers (p = 0.046). Higher speech volumes can compensate this effect. The recognition rate depends on the type of background noise. Mixed OR noise (52 dB(A)) reduced the detection rate significantly compared to single suction noise at 52 dB(A) (p ≤ 0.00001). The recognition rate was significantly better in the OR than in the audio cubicle (p = 0.00013 both genders, 0.0086 female, and 0.0036 male). The recognition rate of voice commands can be enhanced by increasing the speech volume and by singularizing ambient noises. The detection rate depends on the loudness of the OR noise. Male voices are understood significantly better than female voices.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36269364
doi: 10.1007/s00405-022-07699-8
pii: 10.1007/s00405-022-07699-8
pmc: PMC9988782
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2043-2049Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Surg Endosc. 2006 Dec;20(12):1879-82
pubmed: 17031749
Neurosurgery. 1998 Aug;43(2):392-5; discussion 395-6
pubmed: 9696099
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 May 18;22(1):451
pubmed: 34006234
J Digit Imaging. 2021 Aug;34(4):1014-1025
pubmed: 34027587
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Jul;278(7):2473-2483
pubmed: 32910225
J Perianesth Nurs. 2010 Dec;25(6):380-6
pubmed: 21126668
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 1;14(7):e0219174
pubmed: 31260497
Urology. 2018 May;115:184
pubmed: 29548868
J Perioper Pract. 2008 Sep;18(9):384, 386-91
pubmed: 18828453
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2021;83(6):439-448
pubmed: 33784686
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2021 Feb;103(2):83-87
pubmed: 33559553
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Jul 15;43(14):1018-1023
pubmed: 29215500
Front Surg. 2021 Mar 30;8:657901
pubmed: 33859995
World Neurosurg. 2018 Oct;118:e422-e427
pubmed: 30257298
Int J Med Robot. 2018 Apr;14(2):
pubmed: 29282850
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 May;216(5):933-8
pubmed: 23518255
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2022 Feb;17(2):385-391
pubmed: 34817764
Neuroinformatics. 2018 Oct;16(3-4):339-349
pubmed: 29435954