Susceptibility of primary, secondary and suspected vectors to Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum infection in Ethiopia.
Anopheles
Ethiopia
Infection rate
Malaria
Membrane feeding assay
Oocysts
Plasmodium species
Journal
Parasites & vectors
ISSN: 1756-3305
Titre abrégé: Parasit Vectors
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101462774
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 Oct 2022
21 Oct 2022
Historique:
received:
07
05
2022
accepted:
22
08
2022
entrez:
22
10
2022
pubmed:
23
10
2022
medline:
26
10
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Insecticide-based vector control interventions in combination with case management with artemisinin-based combination therapy has reduced malaria incidence and prevalence worldwide. Current control methods focus on the primary malaria vectors, Anopheles gambiae sensu lato (s.l.) and the An. funestus group; however, the impact of secondary and suspected vectors has been either sidelined or received limited attention. Defining the susceptibility of secondary, suspected vector species to different parasites in time and space is essential for efficient malaria control and elimination programs. The aim of this study was to assess the susceptibility of An. gambiae s.l., An. coustani complex and An. pharoensis to Plasmodium vivax and P. falciparum infection in Ethiopia. Larvae of Anopheles spp. were collected from different aquatic habitats and reared to adults under laboratory conditions, with the temperature and humidity maintained at 27 ± 1 °C and 75 ± 5%, respectively. Adult female mosquitoes were identified to species as An. gambiae s.l., An. coustani complex and An. pharoensis. Females of these three Anopheles spp. were allowed to feed in parallel feeding assays on infected blood containing the same gametocytes isolated from P. falciparum and P. vivax gametocyte-positive patients by indirect membrane feeding assays. All blood-fed mosquitoes were held under laboratory conditions. After 7 days, all surviving mosquitoes were dissected to detect mid-gut oocyst and enumerated under a microscope. Of 5915 female Anopheles mosquitoes exposed to gametocyte-infected blood, 2106 (35.6%)s fed successfully in the 32 independent infection experiments. There was a significant variation in feeding rates among An. gambiae s.l., An. pharoensis and An. coustani complex (G-test = 48.43, P = 3.049e-11). All three exposed mosquito species were receptive to P. vivax and P. falciparum infection development. The percentage of infected mosquitoes following feeding on an infected blood meal was significantly different among species (G-test = 6.49, P = 0.03886). The median infection intensity (II) for An. coustani complex, An. gambiae s.l. and An. pharoensis was 1.16, 2.00 and 1.25, respectively. Although the proportion of infected mosquitoes significantly differed in terms of II, infection rate (IR) and mean oocyst density among the species, mean oocyst density and IR were highly correlated with gametocyte density in all tests (P < 0.001). Primary, secondary and suspected vectors were experimentally susceptible to both P. vivax and P. falciparum infection. An effective malaria elimination program might include surveillance and control tools which target secondary and suspected vectors that might play an outdoor transmission role, possibly resulting in reduced focal malaria transmission. Comparison of the three species' mean infection rates with standard deviation.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Insecticide-based vector control interventions in combination with case management with artemisinin-based combination therapy has reduced malaria incidence and prevalence worldwide. Current control methods focus on the primary malaria vectors, Anopheles gambiae sensu lato (s.l.) and the An. funestus group; however, the impact of secondary and suspected vectors has been either sidelined or received limited attention. Defining the susceptibility of secondary, suspected vector species to different parasites in time and space is essential for efficient malaria control and elimination programs. The aim of this study was to assess the susceptibility of An. gambiae s.l., An. coustani complex and An. pharoensis to Plasmodium vivax and P. falciparum infection in Ethiopia.
METHODS
METHODS
Larvae of Anopheles spp. were collected from different aquatic habitats and reared to adults under laboratory conditions, with the temperature and humidity maintained at 27 ± 1 °C and 75 ± 5%, respectively. Adult female mosquitoes were identified to species as An. gambiae s.l., An. coustani complex and An. pharoensis. Females of these three Anopheles spp. were allowed to feed in parallel feeding assays on infected blood containing the same gametocytes isolated from P. falciparum and P. vivax gametocyte-positive patients by indirect membrane feeding assays. All blood-fed mosquitoes were held under laboratory conditions. After 7 days, all surviving mosquitoes were dissected to detect mid-gut oocyst and enumerated under a microscope.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Of 5915 female Anopheles mosquitoes exposed to gametocyte-infected blood, 2106 (35.6%)s fed successfully in the 32 independent infection experiments. There was a significant variation in feeding rates among An. gambiae s.l., An. pharoensis and An. coustani complex (G-test = 48.43, P = 3.049e-11). All three exposed mosquito species were receptive to P. vivax and P. falciparum infection development. The percentage of infected mosquitoes following feeding on an infected blood meal was significantly different among species (G-test = 6.49, P = 0.03886). The median infection intensity (II) for An. coustani complex, An. gambiae s.l. and An. pharoensis was 1.16, 2.00 and 1.25, respectively. Although the proportion of infected mosquitoes significantly differed in terms of II, infection rate (IR) and mean oocyst density among the species, mean oocyst density and IR were highly correlated with gametocyte density in all tests (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Primary, secondary and suspected vectors were experimentally susceptible to both P. vivax and P. falciparum infection. An effective malaria elimination program might include surveillance and control tools which target secondary and suspected vectors that might play an outdoor transmission role, possibly resulting in reduced focal malaria transmission. Comparison of the three species' mean infection rates with standard deviation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36271436
doi: 10.1186/s13071-022-05467-5
pii: 10.1186/s13071-022-05467-5
pmc: PMC9587640
doi:
Substances chimiques
Insecticides
0
Artemisinins
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
384Subventions
Organisme : FIC NIH HHS
ID : D43 TW001505
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : U19 AI129326
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005 Apr;72(4):392-406
pubmed: 15827275
J Parasitol. 2005 Feb;91(1):79-82
pubmed: 15856876
BMC Public Health. 2013 Jul 08;13:637
pubmed: 23834734
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1999 Jul-Aug;93(4):381-4
pubmed: 10674081
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1996 Nov-Dec;90(6):621-4
pubmed: 9015496
Parasit Vectors. 2021 Oct 7;14(1):516
pubmed: 34620228
Malar J. 2009 Jun 07;8:123
pubmed: 19500425
J Infect Dis. 2021 Apr 27;223(12 Suppl 2):S155-S170
pubmed: 33906217
Malar J. 2013 Oct 02;12:350
pubmed: 24083353
BMC Physiol. 2008 Dec 16;8:23
pubmed: 19087335
Trop Med Int Health. 2003 Jul;8(7):643-9
pubmed: 12828548
Acta Trop. 2018 Dec;188:180-186
pubmed: 30189199
Parasit Vectors. 2021 May 12;14(1):252
pubmed: 33980273
Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1963 Jun;57:204-13
pubmed: 14042651
Malar J. 2015 Dec 01;14:475
pubmed: 26620552
Parasit Vectors. 2016 Oct 18;9(1):552
pubmed: 27756355
Parasit Vectors. 2013 Jun 14;6:176
pubmed: 23768077
Malar J. 2021 Apr 20;20(1):191
pubmed: 33879163
Acta Trop. 2003 Aug;87(3):331-40
pubmed: 12875926
Parasit Vectors. 2012 May 30;5:101
pubmed: 22647493
Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Oct 22;276(1673):3721-6
pubmed: 19656795
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007 Mar;76(3):470-4
pubmed: 17360869
Malar J. 2020 Sep 22;19(1):344
pubmed: 32962693
Malar J. 2011 Jul 14;10:190
pubmed: 21756317
Malar J. 2007 Apr 30;6:50
pubmed: 17470293
Malar J. 2019 Jul 29;18(1):257
pubmed: 31358015
Malar J. 2014 Aug 08;13:304
pubmed: 25107355
Malar J. 2013 Dec 21;12:460
pubmed: 24359307
Infect Dis Poverty. 2018 Nov 05;7(1):103
pubmed: 30392470
Trop Med Health. 2017 Feb 24;45:4
pubmed: 28250711
Malar J. 2017 Jul 4;16(1):271
pubmed: 28676108
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1964 Mar;58:154-8
pubmed: 14128582
Trop Med Parasitol. 1992 Sep;43(3):181-5
pubmed: 1470839
Emerg Infect Dis. 2010 Oct;16(10):1611-4
pubmed: 20875292
Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1963 Dec;57:435-42
pubmed: 14101933
Br Med Bull. 1982 May;38(2):207-12
pubmed: 7052203
Parasit Vectors. 2013 Apr 20;6:114
pubmed: 23601146
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2011 Aug;11(8):1173-9
pubmed: 21142969
Parasit Vectors. 2020 Aug 26;13(1):430
pubmed: 32843082
Parasit Vectors. 2018 May 4;11(1):288
pubmed: 29728152
J Med Entomol. 2006 Nov;43(6):1215-21
pubmed: 17162956
Malar J. 2019 May 2;18(1):156
pubmed: 31046769
J Med Entomol. 2020 Nov 13;57(6):1782-1792
pubmed: 32614047
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010 Oct;83(4):848-53
pubmed: 20889878
Infect Dis Poverty. 2020 Jan 27;9(1):9
pubmed: 31987056
Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Oct 3;285(1888):
pubmed: 30282657
Malar J. 2018 Oct 26;17(1):390
pubmed: 30367636
Malar J. 2005 Jan 11;4:3
pubmed: 15644136
J Infect Dis. 2016 Jan 1;213(1):90-9
pubmed: 26142435
Zootaxa. 2020 Mar 04;4747(3):zootaxa.4747.3.1
pubmed: 32230095
Malar J. 2017 Nov 6;16(1):443
pubmed: 29110670