Training-dependent plasticity and far transfer effect enhanced by Bobath rehabilitation in Multiple Sclerosis.
Balance
Bobath concept
Multiple sclerosis
Personalized medicine
Rehabilitation
Journal
Multiple sclerosis and related disorders
ISSN: 2211-0356
Titre abrégé: Mult Scler Relat Disord
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101580247
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2022
Dec 2022
Historique:
received:
18
08
2022
revised:
21
09
2022
accepted:
09
10
2022
pubmed:
25
10
2022
medline:
15
12
2022
entrez:
24
10
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a disease that often results in motor and/or cognitive disability. Despite the increasing availability of effective drug therapies, rehabilitation is very important means of counteracting the progression of disability and improving physical function, impacting social participation and improving quality of life. Several rehabilitation approaches can be used in the context of neuro-motor rehabilitation, but there is insufficient evidence for them in the literature. This study has the twofold purpose of: (i) investigate whether rehabilitation according to Bobath Concept can improve balance and some aspects of cognitive function in MS patients; (ii) explore whether the ability to improve postural control, an indirect index of adaptive neuroplasticity, is preserved in MS patients and whether it can be improved with rehabilitation. This is an independent wait-listed study. Forty people with MS (pwMS) were enrolled: patients in the Bobath group underwent 8 weeks of rehabilitation according to the Bobath Concept. For aim 1, pwMS were assessed at baseline (T0), at the end of the 8 weeks of treatment (T1) and after 8 weeks of observation (T2) with motor and cognitive scales. For aim 2, the same 40 pwMS were matched with healthy controls and were subjected to a postural learning task using the force platform at T0, T1 and T2. Patients in Bobath group scored better on balance and cognitive function at T1, but this improvement was not maintained at T2. All patients were less accurate than controls in the postural learning task at each assessment; however, patients also demonstrated an increase in accuracy after training, similar to that of healthy controls. The learning curve was better for patients randomized to the active group than the waitlist at T1 time, but this advantage was not maintained at the T2 assessment. In light of the results, this study supports the use of rehabilitation according to Bobath Concept to improve balance control and some executive functions in MS. Despite worse baseline performance, pwMS were able to learn a postural control task on par with healthy controls. Also, supports the hypothesis that adaptive plasticity is preserved despite MS and can be promoted by rehabilitation.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a disease that often results in motor and/or cognitive disability. Despite the increasing availability of effective drug therapies, rehabilitation is very important means of counteracting the progression of disability and improving physical function, impacting social participation and improving quality of life. Several rehabilitation approaches can be used in the context of neuro-motor rehabilitation, but there is insufficient evidence for them in the literature.
OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
This study has the twofold purpose of: (i) investigate whether rehabilitation according to Bobath Concept can improve balance and some aspects of cognitive function in MS patients; (ii) explore whether the ability to improve postural control, an indirect index of adaptive neuroplasticity, is preserved in MS patients and whether it can be improved with rehabilitation.
METHOD
METHODS
This is an independent wait-listed study. Forty people with MS (pwMS) were enrolled: patients in the Bobath group underwent 8 weeks of rehabilitation according to the Bobath Concept. For aim 1, pwMS were assessed at baseline (T0), at the end of the 8 weeks of treatment (T1) and after 8 weeks of observation (T2) with motor and cognitive scales. For aim 2, the same 40 pwMS were matched with healthy controls and were subjected to a postural learning task using the force platform at T0, T1 and T2.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Patients in Bobath group scored better on balance and cognitive function at T1, but this improvement was not maintained at T2. All patients were less accurate than controls in the postural learning task at each assessment; however, patients also demonstrated an increase in accuracy after training, similar to that of healthy controls. The learning curve was better for patients randomized to the active group than the waitlist at T1 time, but this advantage was not maintained at the T2 assessment.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
In light of the results, this study supports the use of rehabilitation according to Bobath Concept to improve balance control and some executive functions in MS. Despite worse baseline performance, pwMS were able to learn a postural control task on par with healthy controls. Also, supports the hypothesis that adaptive plasticity is preserved despite MS and can be promoted by rehabilitation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36274281
pii: S2211-0348(22)00745-3
doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.104241
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
104241Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest LC: consulting fees from Almirall. CP: scientific advisory boards for Actelion, Biogen, Genzyme, Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi, Teva; consulting and/or speaking fees, research support and travel grants from Allergan, Almirall, Biogen, Genzyme, Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi and Teva.STAI: State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Form Y 1-2; BDI-II: Beck Depression Inventory Scale-II; SDMT: Symbol Digit Modalities Test; CVLT-II: California Verbal Learning Test-II; BVMT-R: revised Brief Visuospatial Memory Test; SCWT: Stroop Colour Word Test; BBS: Berg Balance Scale; CoP path ST: Center Of Pressure Single Task: CoP path DT: Center Of Pressure Dual Task; G-BR: Group Bobath Rehabilitation; G-WL: Group Waiting List.