Vision Quality Questionnaire Assessment in Patients After Topography-Guided Photorefractive Keratectomy for Irregular Astigmatism Secondary to Radial Keratotomy.
NEI-RQL
quality of life
radial keratotomy
topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy
Journal
Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)
ISSN: 1177-5467
Titre abrégé: Clin Ophthalmol
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101321512
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
20
08
2022
accepted:
07
10
2022
entrez:
24
10
2022
pubmed:
25
10
2022
medline:
25
10
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To evaluate the vision-related quality of life with the National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality of Life (NEI-RQL) questionnaire in patients with astigmatism secondary to radial keratotomy surgery who underwent topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy. Prospective non-randomized clinical trial. This study included 15 patients (30 eyes) aged > 21 years, mean age 55.1 (SD, 3.5) years, 53.3% female, with astigmatism ≤ - 6.00 D resulting from radial keratotomy, which could have been associated with hyperopia ≤ + 6.00 D. Photorefractive keratectomy with topography-guided custom ablation treatment was used in all cases. The patients answered the NEI-RQL questionnaire preoperatively and at 4 and 48 months after topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy. The following data were collected: age, sex and education level, pre-operative refraction data, visual acuity with or without correction, pachymetry, and keratometry. There was a significant difference between pre-and postoperative NEI-RQL scores for the domains clarity of vision, near vision, far vision, diurnal fluctuation, activity limitations, glare, symptoms, correction dependence, appearance, and satisfaction with correction (p < 0.001). Topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy improved vision-related quality of life in patients with a history of irregular astigmatism secondary to radial keratotomy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36274677
doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S386009
pii: 386009
pmc: PMC9581467
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
3491-3501Informations de copyright
© 2022 Colombo-Barboza et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
Références
Arch Ophthalmol. 1994 Oct;112(10):1298-308
pubmed: 7945032
J Refract Surg. 2006 Apr;22(4):335-44
pubmed: 16629063
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2002 Aug;13(4):237-41
pubmed: 12165707
Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2007 Sep-Oct;70(5):803-8
pubmed: 18157305
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014 Jul;40(7):1131-8
pubmed: 24957433
J Curr Ophthalmol. 2015 Nov 17;27(1-2):32-6
pubmed: 27239572
Ophthalmology. 2003 Dec;110(12):2285-91
pubmed: 14644709
J Refract Surg. 2008 Nov;24(9):911-22
pubmed: 19044232
J Refract Surg. 2018 Sep 1;34(9):597-603
pubmed: 30199563
Eye Contact Lens. 2019 Jan;45(1):34-39
pubmed: 30048340
J Refract Surg. 2002 Jan-Feb;18(1):23-9
pubmed: 11828903
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005 Dec;31(12):2313-8
pubmed: 16473223
Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2005 Jan-Feb;68(1):140-9
pubmed: 15824821
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018 Mar;44(3):274-279
pubmed: 29610024
Arch Ophthalmol. 2003 Sep;121(9):1289-96
pubmed: 12963612
Ophthalmology. 2003 Dec;110(12):2302-9
pubmed: 14644711
Optom Vis Sci. 1996 Sep;73(9):585-9
pubmed: 8887401
Refract Corneal Surg. 1989 Jan-Feb;5(1):58-9
pubmed: 2488784
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Jul;36(7):1173-80
pubmed: 20610097
Ophthalmology. 2003 Dec;110(12):2292-301
pubmed: 14644710