Computed Tomography-based Patient-specific Biomechanical and Fluid Dynamic Study of Anomalous Coronary Arteries with Origin from the Opposite Sinus and Intramural Course.

Coronary artery anomalies computed fluid dynamic physiology sudden death

Journal

Heart international
ISSN: 2036-2579
Titre abrégé: Heart Int
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101541778

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 10 09 2020
accepted: 04 12 2020
entrez: 24 10 2022
pubmed: 23 12 2020
medline: 23 12 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The anomalous coronary arteries originating from the opposite sinus of Valsalva (ACAOS) constitutes one of the most clinically relevant coronary artery anomalies in adults. Exact pathophysiology and the impact of intramural (IM) course segment stenting in ACAOS with IM course (ACAOS-IM) has not been clarified. We aimed to elucidate the pathophysiology and impact of stenting applying biomechanical and computational fluid dynamics to computed tomography (CT) in patient-specific coronary vessel reconstruction. We separated coronary artery (left or L-, right or R-) ACAOS-IM into segments (proximal, mid and distal), based on coronary angiography and coronary CT angiography features, in a series of patients at Rovigo General Hospital, Italy, between 1 January 2003 and 1 January 2018. Blood pressure gradient across the coronary circulation, calculated blood flow, vorticity magnitude, wall shear stress (WSS) and IM segment deformation were analysed by simulating exercise, before and after virtual stent implantation. In 21 symptomatic patients (13 males, mean age 46.1 ± 8.1 years, L-ACAOS-IM in 9 and R-ACAOS-IM in 12 patients), computational fluid dynamic analysis in both L- and R-ACAOS demonstrated higher basal WSS values in the IM course (9.5 ± 0.2 and 8.6 ± 0.2 Pa for R- and L-ACAOS, respectively), than in the rest of the vessels. These values decreased after stenting. Vorticity magnitude significantly decreased after stenting as well, compared with baseline. Biomechanical deformation analysis revealed not only compression, but also a twisting of the IM segment with a mean distal pressure drop of 32% and 35% in R- and L-ACAOS, respectively, which was corrected by stent implantation. In both L- and R-ACAOS subtypes, the IM segment appeared to be phasically compressed and deformed with a degree of twisting that causes resting and exercise cross-sectional deformation and a drop in distal pressure. Stenting of the IM segment results in normalisation of the flow profile, correction of the IM segment deformation and reverses the drop in pressure, for both variants of ACAOS.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The anomalous coronary arteries originating from the opposite sinus of Valsalva (ACAOS) constitutes one of the most clinically relevant coronary artery anomalies in adults. Exact pathophysiology and the impact of intramural (IM) course segment stenting in ACAOS with IM course (ACAOS-IM) has not been clarified. We aimed to elucidate the pathophysiology and impact of stenting applying biomechanical and computational fluid dynamics to computed tomography (CT) in patient-specific coronary vessel reconstruction.
METHODS METHODS
We separated coronary artery (left or L-, right or R-) ACAOS-IM into segments (proximal, mid and distal), based on coronary angiography and coronary CT angiography features, in a series of patients at Rovigo General Hospital, Italy, between 1 January 2003 and 1 January 2018. Blood pressure gradient across the coronary circulation, calculated blood flow, vorticity magnitude, wall shear stress (WSS) and IM segment deformation were analysed by simulating exercise, before and after virtual stent implantation.
RESULTS RESULTS
In 21 symptomatic patients (13 males, mean age 46.1 ± 8.1 years, L-ACAOS-IM in 9 and R-ACAOS-IM in 12 patients), computational fluid dynamic analysis in both L- and R-ACAOS demonstrated higher basal WSS values in the IM course (9.5 ± 0.2 and 8.6 ± 0.2 Pa for R- and L-ACAOS, respectively), than in the rest of the vessels. These values decreased after stenting. Vorticity magnitude significantly decreased after stenting as well, compared with baseline. Biomechanical deformation analysis revealed not only compression, but also a twisting of the IM segment with a mean distal pressure drop of 32% and 35% in R- and L-ACAOS, respectively, which was corrected by stent implantation.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
In both L- and R-ACAOS subtypes, the IM segment appeared to be phasically compressed and deformed with a degree of twisting that causes resting and exercise cross-sectional deformation and a drop in distal pressure. Stenting of the IM segment results in normalisation of the flow profile, correction of the IM segment deformation and reverses the drop in pressure, for both variants of ACAOS.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36276502
doi: 10.17925/HI.2020.14.2.105
pmc: PMC9524708
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

105-111

Informations de copyright

© Touch Medical Media 2020.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Disclosures: Gianluca Rigatelli and Marco Zuin have no financial or non-financial relationships or activities to declare in relation to this article.

Références

J Biomech. 2004 May;37(5):709-20
pubmed: 15047000
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019 Dec;20(12):1112-1116
pubmed: 30808598
Atherosclerosis. 2018 Jun;273:136-144
pubmed: 29501225
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2012 Jun;20(3):299-303
pubmed: 22718718
Phys Med Biol. 2008 Sep 21;53(18):4875-92
pubmed: 18711245
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2008 Dec;9(12):1293-4
pubmed: 19001945
Tex Heart Inst J. 2015 Jun 01;42(3):246-7
pubmed: 26175639
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Jul;7(4):747-54
pubmed: 25027456
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Aug 1;92(2):313-321
pubmed: 30051621
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004 Aug;26(2):248-56
pubmed: 15296879
Cardiol Res. 2018 Apr;9(2):120-124
pubmed: 29755631
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2008 Feb;9(2):113-21
pubmed: 18192801
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Jun;155(6):2554-2564.e3
pubmed: 29526358
Tex Heart Inst J. 2018 Aug 1;45(4):205-213
pubmed: 30374227
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Mar 14;9(5):507-8
pubmed: 26965944
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 May;35(6):1493-501
pubmed: 10807452
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jul;92(1):68-75
pubmed: 29521471
Clin J Sport Med. 2020 Jul;30(4):305-314
pubmed: 32639440
J Biomech. 1992 Mar;25(3):287-95
pubmed: 1564062
J Invasive Cardiol. 2003 Sep;15(9):507-14
pubmed: 12947211
Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2018 Jun;39(2):114-118
pubmed: 29461269
Biorheology. 1991;28(3-4):241-62
pubmed: 1932716
Ann Thorac Surg. 2011 Sep;92(3):986-91; discussion 991-2
pubmed: 21871287
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1987;516:422-41
pubmed: 3439740

Auteurs

Gianluca Rigatelli (G)

Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Endoluminal Interventions Unit, Rovigo General Hospital, Rovigo, Italy.

Marco Zuin (M)

Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Endoluminal Interventions Unit, Rovigo General Hospital, Rovigo, Italy.
Section of Internal and Cardiopulmonary Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.

Classifications MeSH