One-year outcomes following primary stenting of infrapopliteal steno-occlusive arterial disease using a non-polymer sirolimus-eluting stent: Results from a prospective single-centre cohort study.
Cre8
chronic limb ischaemia
infrapopliteal angioplasty
sirolimus
stent
Journal
Frontiers in surgery
ISSN: 2296-875X
Titre abrégé: Front Surg
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101645127
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
28
05
2022
accepted:
14
09
2022
entrez:
24
10
2022
pubmed:
25
10
2022
medline:
25
10
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Clinical outcomes using new generation drug-eluting stents designed specifically for infrapopliteal disease are not widely available, especially in comparison to paclitaxel-based therapies. This series reports 1-year outcomes in patients with diabetes and chronic limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI) undergoing angioplasty, with a sirolimus-eluting tibial stent (Cre8, Alvimedica, Turkey), evaluating the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of this new device. Outcomes were compared to matched patients undergoing infrapopliteal angioplasty using a paclitaxel-coated balloon (DCB). Patients with diabetes and CLTI requiring infrapopliteal intervention were recruited prospectively to undergo angioplasty and primary stenting using the Cre8 sirolimus-eluting stent between January 2018 and October 2020 at a single high-volume vascular centre; outcomes were compared to a group of patients with diabetes and CLTI who had undergone infrapopliteal angioplasty using a DCB. All patients were followed up for at least 12 months using a uniform protocol with duplex ultrasound and examination. The primary outcome measure was target lesion patency (<50% restenosis). Clinically driven target lesion revascularisation (CD-TLR), amputations, Rutherford stage, and mortality were also recorded. A total of 54 patients (61 target lesions; median age: 69 years, 74% male) were included [27 with the Cre8 device (main group) vs. 27 with a DCB (historical controls)]. Primary patency at 12 months was 81% in the Cre8 group vs. 71% in the control group ( Primary stenting with the Cre8 stent is feasible and safe in diabetic patients and CLTI. When compared to patients undergoing angioplasty with a DCB, there were no significant differences regarding primary patency, CD-TLR, major amputations, and mortality at 12 months. Those treated with a Cre8 stent were more likely to have an improvement in their Rutherford stage.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Clinical outcomes using new generation drug-eluting stents designed specifically for infrapopliteal disease are not widely available, especially in comparison to paclitaxel-based therapies. This series reports 1-year outcomes in patients with diabetes and chronic limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI) undergoing angioplasty, with a sirolimus-eluting tibial stent (Cre8, Alvimedica, Turkey), evaluating the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of this new device. Outcomes were compared to matched patients undergoing infrapopliteal angioplasty using a paclitaxel-coated balloon (DCB).
Patients and Methods
UNASSIGNED
Patients with diabetes and CLTI requiring infrapopliteal intervention were recruited prospectively to undergo angioplasty and primary stenting using the Cre8 sirolimus-eluting stent between January 2018 and October 2020 at a single high-volume vascular centre; outcomes were compared to a group of patients with diabetes and CLTI who had undergone infrapopliteal angioplasty using a DCB. All patients were followed up for at least 12 months using a uniform protocol with duplex ultrasound and examination. The primary outcome measure was target lesion patency (<50% restenosis). Clinically driven target lesion revascularisation (CD-TLR), amputations, Rutherford stage, and mortality were also recorded.
Results
UNASSIGNED
A total of 54 patients (61 target lesions; median age: 69 years, 74% male) were included [27 with the Cre8 device (main group) vs. 27 with a DCB (historical controls)]. Primary patency at 12 months was 81% in the Cre8 group vs. 71% in the control group (
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
Primary stenting with the Cre8 stent is feasible and safe in diabetic patients and CLTI. When compared to patients undergoing angioplasty with a DCB, there were no significant differences regarding primary patency, CD-TLR, major amputations, and mortality at 12 months. Those treated with a Cre8 stent were more likely to have an improvement in their Rutherford stage.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36277289
doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.955211
pmc: PMC9581304
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
955211Informations de copyright
© 2022 Tigkiropoulos, Lazaridis, Nikas, Abatzis-Papadopoulos, Sidiropoulou, Stavridis, Karamanos, Saratzis and Saratzis.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Aug 14;60(7):587-91
pubmed: 22878166
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jan;7(1):10-9
pubmed: 24456716
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Feb;55(2):390-8
pubmed: 22169682
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2010 Apr;33(2):260-9
pubmed: 19957178
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Jul;64(1):e1-e21
pubmed: 27345516
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020 Aug;60(2):220-229
pubmed: 32370918
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019 Jul;58(1S):S1-S109.e33
pubmed: 31182334
BMJ. 2018 Feb 1;360:j5842
pubmed: 29419394
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2020 Apr;17(4):267-275
pubmed: 32151183
J Endovasc Ther. 2016 Dec;23(6):851-863
pubmed: 27708143
Vasc Specialist Int. 2018 Dec;34(4):94-102
pubmed: 30671418
BMJ Open. 2016 May 09;6(5):e011245
pubmed: 27160845
EuroIntervention. 2022 Apr 01;17(17):e1445-e1454
pubmed: 34602386
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020 Feb;31(2):202-212
pubmed: 31954604
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Apr 15;63(14):1378-86
pubmed: 24412457
J Endovasc Ther. 2009 Jun;16(3):251-60
pubmed: 19642789
J Invasive Cardiol. 2019 Aug;31(8):205-211
pubmed: 31368893
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2016 Jan;32 Suppl 1:136-44
pubmed: 26342204
Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 Oct;76:406-416
pubmed: 33951523
Int Angiol. 2019 Apr;38(2):121-135
pubmed: 30650949
Curr Med Res Opin. 2008 Sep;24(9):2509-22
pubmed: 18664318
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jun;69(6):1840-1847
pubmed: 30852037
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019 Jul;58(1):52-59
pubmed: 30786974