One-year outcomes following primary stenting of infrapopliteal steno-occlusive arterial disease using a non-polymer sirolimus-eluting stent: Results from a prospective single-centre cohort study.

Cre8 chronic limb ischaemia infrapopliteal angioplasty sirolimus stent

Journal

Frontiers in surgery
ISSN: 2296-875X
Titre abrégé: Front Surg
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101645127

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 28 05 2022
accepted: 14 09 2022
entrez: 24 10 2022
pubmed: 25 10 2022
medline: 25 10 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Clinical outcomes using new generation drug-eluting stents designed specifically for infrapopliteal disease are not widely available, especially in comparison to paclitaxel-based therapies. This series reports 1-year outcomes in patients with diabetes and chronic limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI) undergoing angioplasty, with a sirolimus-eluting tibial stent (Cre8, Alvimedica, Turkey), evaluating the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of this new device. Outcomes were compared to matched patients undergoing infrapopliteal angioplasty using a paclitaxel-coated balloon (DCB). Patients with diabetes and CLTI requiring infrapopliteal intervention were recruited prospectively to undergo angioplasty and primary stenting using the Cre8 sirolimus-eluting stent between January 2018 and October 2020 at a single high-volume vascular centre; outcomes were compared to a group of patients with diabetes and CLTI who had undergone infrapopliteal angioplasty using a DCB. All patients were followed up for at least 12 months using a uniform protocol with duplex ultrasound and examination. The primary outcome measure was target lesion patency (<50% restenosis). Clinically driven target lesion revascularisation (CD-TLR), amputations, Rutherford stage, and mortality were also recorded. A total of 54 patients (61 target lesions; median age: 69 years, 74% male) were included [27 with the Cre8 device (main group) vs. 27 with a DCB (historical controls)]. Primary patency at 12 months was 81% in the Cre8 group vs. 71% in the control group ( Primary stenting with the Cre8 stent is feasible and safe in diabetic patients and CLTI. When compared to patients undergoing angioplasty with a DCB, there were no significant differences regarding primary patency, CD-TLR, major amputations, and mortality at 12 months. Those treated with a Cre8 stent were more likely to have an improvement in their Rutherford stage.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Clinical outcomes using new generation drug-eluting stents designed specifically for infrapopliteal disease are not widely available, especially in comparison to paclitaxel-based therapies. This series reports 1-year outcomes in patients with diabetes and chronic limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI) undergoing angioplasty, with a sirolimus-eluting tibial stent (Cre8, Alvimedica, Turkey), evaluating the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of this new device. Outcomes were compared to matched patients undergoing infrapopliteal angioplasty using a paclitaxel-coated balloon (DCB).
Patients and Methods UNASSIGNED
Patients with diabetes and CLTI requiring infrapopliteal intervention were recruited prospectively to undergo angioplasty and primary stenting using the Cre8 sirolimus-eluting stent between January 2018 and October 2020 at a single high-volume vascular centre; outcomes were compared to a group of patients with diabetes and CLTI who had undergone infrapopliteal angioplasty using a DCB. All patients were followed up for at least 12 months using a uniform protocol with duplex ultrasound and examination. The primary outcome measure was target lesion patency (<50% restenosis). Clinically driven target lesion revascularisation (CD-TLR), amputations, Rutherford stage, and mortality were also recorded.
Results UNASSIGNED
A total of 54 patients (61 target lesions; median age: 69 years, 74% male) were included [27 with the Cre8 device (main group) vs. 27 with a DCB (historical controls)]. Primary patency at 12 months was 81% in the Cre8 group vs. 71% in the control group (
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
Primary stenting with the Cre8 stent is feasible and safe in diabetic patients and CLTI. When compared to patients undergoing angioplasty with a DCB, there were no significant differences regarding primary patency, CD-TLR, major amputations, and mortality at 12 months. Those treated with a Cre8 stent were more likely to have an improvement in their Rutherford stage.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36277289
doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.955211
pmc: PMC9581304
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

955211

Informations de copyright

© 2022 Tigkiropoulos, Lazaridis, Nikas, Abatzis-Papadopoulos, Sidiropoulou, Stavridis, Karamanos, Saratzis and Saratzis.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Aug 14;60(7):587-91
pubmed: 22878166
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jan;7(1):10-9
pubmed: 24456716
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Feb;55(2):390-8
pubmed: 22169682
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2010 Apr;33(2):260-9
pubmed: 19957178
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Jul;64(1):e1-e21
pubmed: 27345516
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020 Aug;60(2):220-229
pubmed: 32370918
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019 Jul;58(1S):S1-S109.e33
pubmed: 31182334
BMJ. 2018 Feb 1;360:j5842
pubmed: 29419394
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2020 Apr;17(4):267-275
pubmed: 32151183
J Endovasc Ther. 2016 Dec;23(6):851-863
pubmed: 27708143
Vasc Specialist Int. 2018 Dec;34(4):94-102
pubmed: 30671418
BMJ Open. 2016 May 09;6(5):e011245
pubmed: 27160845
EuroIntervention. 2022 Apr 01;17(17):e1445-e1454
pubmed: 34602386
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020 Feb;31(2):202-212
pubmed: 31954604
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Apr 15;63(14):1378-86
pubmed: 24412457
J Endovasc Ther. 2009 Jun;16(3):251-60
pubmed: 19642789
J Invasive Cardiol. 2019 Aug;31(8):205-211
pubmed: 31368893
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2016 Jan;32 Suppl 1:136-44
pubmed: 26342204
Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 Oct;76:406-416
pubmed: 33951523
Int Angiol. 2019 Apr;38(2):121-135
pubmed: 30650949
Curr Med Res Opin. 2008 Sep;24(9):2509-22
pubmed: 18664318
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jun;69(6):1840-1847
pubmed: 30852037
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019 Jul;58(1):52-59
pubmed: 30786974

Auteurs

Konstantinos Tigkiropoulos (K)

1st Surgical Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University, Papageorgiou General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Ioannis Lazaridis (I)

1st Surgical Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University, Papageorgiou General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Spyridon Nikas (S)

1st Surgical Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University, Papageorgiou General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Manolis Abatzis-Papadopoulos (M)

1st Surgical Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University, Papageorgiou General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Katerina Sidiropoulou (K)

1st Surgical Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University, Papageorgiou General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Kyriakos Stavridis (K)

1st Surgical Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University, Papageorgiou General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Dimitrios Karamanos (D)

1st Surgical Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University, Papageorgiou General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Athanasios Saratzis (A)

Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University Hospital Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.

Nikolaos Saratzis (N)

1st Surgical Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University, Papageorgiou General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Classifications MeSH