Cytotoxicity evaluation and mechanism of endocrine-disrupting chemicals by the embryoid body test.

Embryoid body test Endoplasmic stress Mouse embryonic stem cells

Journal

Toxicological research
ISSN: 1976-8257
Titre abrégé: Toxicol Res
Pays: Singapore
ID NLM: 101483324

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2022
Historique:
received: 20 01 2022
revised: 06 03 2022
accepted: 23 03 2022
entrez: 24 10 2022
pubmed: 25 10 2022
medline: 25 10 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) are a structurally diverse class of synthetic and natural compounds. EDCs can cause non-communicable diseases such as obesity, type 2 diabetes, thyroid disorders, neurodevelopmental disease, hormone-dependent cancers, and reproductive disorders. The embryoid body test (EBT) is a developmental toxicity test method that determines the size of embryoid bodies (EBs) and the viability of mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) and fibroblasts (3T3 cells). The present study used the EBT to perform cytotoxicity evaluations of 10 EDCs and assessed the mechanistic relationship between endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and cytotoxicity. According to the statistical analysis and prediction model results, methylparaben, butylparaben, propylparaben, ethylparaben, triclosan, octylphenol, methoxychlor, bisphenol A, and diethylstilbestrol were classified as cytotoxic, but trichloroacetic acid was non-toxic. Classification accuracy was 90%. The mechanistic study showed that the cytotoxicities of butylparaben, propylparaben, octylphenol, and triclosan were induced by ER stress. The mRNA expressions of BiP, CHOP, and ATF4 were significantly higher following treatments with four EDCs compared to those after the control treatment. Compared to the control treatment, the mRNA levels of XBP1u and XBP1s increased significantly after butylparaben and propylparaben treatments, but did not increase with octylphenol and triclosan treatments. These results indicate that the EBT can be applied as an alternative toxicity test when evaluating the cytotoxicity of EDCs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36277366
doi: 10.1007/s43188-022-00132-6
pii: 132
pmc: PMC9532489
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

469-478

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Korean Society of Toxicology 2022.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of interestThe authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Références

Ann Intern Med. 1995 May 15;122(10):778-88
pubmed: 7717601
Nat Neurosci. 2017 Dec;20(12):1694-1707
pubmed: 29184203
Clin Infect Dis. 2002 Oct 15;35(Suppl 2):S210-24
pubmed: 12353208
J Cell Physiol. 2019 Nov;234(11):19807-19823
pubmed: 30989653
Environ Health Perspect. 1998 Feb;106 Suppl 1:11-56
pubmed: 9539004
Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2015 Jul;40(1):241-58
pubmed: 26164742
Crit Rev Toxicol. 1997 Jul;27(4):367-79
pubmed: 9263644
Food Chem Toxicol. 2019 Jan;123:50-56
pubmed: 30339957
Food Chem Toxicol. 2001 Jun;39(6):513-32
pubmed: 11346481
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020 Jan;19(1):137-146
pubmed: 31603267
J Physiol Pharmacol. 2020 Apr;71(2):
pubmed: 32633240
Toxicol Lett. 2012 Jan 25;208(2):142-8
pubmed: 22062131
Reprod Toxicol. 2004 Mar-Apr;18(2):231-40
pubmed: 15019721
Endocrinology. 2018 Jan 1;159(1):32-45
pubmed: 29145569
J Endocrinol. 2017 Jun;233(3):R109-R129
pubmed: 28356401
J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2015 Jan-Mar;8(1):37-41
pubmed: 25949021
Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2015 Jan;39(1):327-38
pubmed: 25546121
Endocr Rev. 2001 Jun;22(3):319-41
pubmed: 11399747
Toxicol Res. 2013 Dec 31;29(4):221-7
pubmed: 24578791
Am J Infect Control. 2000 Apr;28(2):184-96
pubmed: 10760227
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 1996 Nov;36(3):163-9
pubmed: 8959582
Reprod Toxicol. 2017 Sep;72:74-85
pubmed: 28673813
Dermatol Surg. 1996 May;22(5):429-32
pubmed: 8634804
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020 Aug;8(8):703-718
pubmed: 32707118
Endocr Rev. 2009 Jun;30(4):293-342
pubmed: 19502515
J Cell Mol Med. 2015 Mar;19(3):581-94
pubmed: 25418486
Environ Int. 2019 Sep;130:104917
pubmed: 31234001
Reprod Toxicol. 2013 Dec;42:132-55
pubmed: 23994667
Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2020;248:81-109
pubmed: 30460491

Auteurs

Eui-Man Jung (EM)

Department of Molecular Biology, College of Natural Sciences, Pusan National University, Busan, 46241 Republic of Korea.

Yeong-Min Yoo (YM)

East Coast Life Sciences Institute, College of Life Science, Gangneung-Wonju National University, Gangneung, Gangwon-do 25457 Republic of Korea.

Jae-Hwan Lee (JH)

Laboratory of Veterinary Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Veterinary Medical Center and College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Chungbuk 28644 Republic of Korea.

Eui-Bae Jeung (EB)

Laboratory of Veterinary Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Veterinary Medical Center and College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Chungbuk 28644 Republic of Korea.

Classifications MeSH